Quality Assessment of Methodological Aspects in Microplastics Studies on Processed Food

IF 1.1 4区 化学 Q4 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Anizah Mahmod, Sarva Mangala Praveena
{"title":"Quality Assessment of Methodological Aspects in Microplastics Studies on Processed Food","authors":"Anizah Mahmod,&nbsp;Sarva Mangala Praveena","doi":"10.1134/S1061934825700819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Interest in the presence of microplastics in processed food continues to grow, yet studies focusing on the methodological aspects, as well as quality assurance (<b>QA</b>) and quality control (<b>QC</b>) procedures, remain limited. Thus, this study focuses on the assessment of methodological aspects employed in microplastics in processed food studies using the Criteria for Reporting and Evaluating Ecotoxicity Data framework. A total of 65 processed food studies conducted between 2015 and 2025 were selected for this assessment. This assessment involved 14 criteria, categorized into three phases: pre-laboratory work, laboratory work, and post-laboratory work. One study achieved the highest score of 27 out of 28, with the average total score ranging from 20 to 24. The lowest overall score was 8. In the pre-laboratory work, the most frequently reported aspect was sample size. During the laboratory work, laboratory preparation received the lowest score of 2, and 49 studies scored 0 for positive controls. In the post-laboratory work, most studies provided particle characteristics; however, for polymer color, 16 studies received a score of 0. The steps taken in pre-laboratory and laboratory work directly impact the accuracy and validity of the data in the post-laboratory work. These scores further reflect the need for stricter QA and QC standards related to the methodological aspects. Future studies can use the current assessment of methodological aspects as a reference to obtain reliable and valid microplastic data, which will increase confidence in their use in toxicity assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":606,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Analytical Chemistry","volume":"80 :","pages":"1606 - 1627"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1061934825700819","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interest in the presence of microplastics in processed food continues to grow, yet studies focusing on the methodological aspects, as well as quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) procedures, remain limited. Thus, this study focuses on the assessment of methodological aspects employed in microplastics in processed food studies using the Criteria for Reporting and Evaluating Ecotoxicity Data framework. A total of 65 processed food studies conducted between 2015 and 2025 were selected for this assessment. This assessment involved 14 criteria, categorized into three phases: pre-laboratory work, laboratory work, and post-laboratory work. One study achieved the highest score of 27 out of 28, with the average total score ranging from 20 to 24. The lowest overall score was 8. In the pre-laboratory work, the most frequently reported aspect was sample size. During the laboratory work, laboratory preparation received the lowest score of 2, and 49 studies scored 0 for positive controls. In the post-laboratory work, most studies provided particle characteristics; however, for polymer color, 16 studies received a score of 0. The steps taken in pre-laboratory and laboratory work directly impact the accuracy and validity of the data in the post-laboratory work. These scores further reflect the need for stricter QA and QC standards related to the methodological aspects. Future studies can use the current assessment of methodological aspects as a reference to obtain reliable and valid microplastic data, which will increase confidence in their use in toxicity assessments.

Abstract Image

加工食品中微塑料研究方法学方面的质量评价
人们对加工食品中存在微塑料的兴趣不断增长,但对方法方面以及质量保证(QA)和质量控制(QC)程序的研究仍然有限。因此,本研究的重点是使用报告和评估生态毒性数据框架的标准来评估加工食品中微塑料研究的方法学方面。本次评估选取了2015年至2025年间进行的65项加工食品研究。该评估涉及14项标准,分为三个阶段:实验室前工作、实验室工作和实验室后工作。一项研究获得了28分中的最高分27分,平均总分在20到24分之间。总分最低为8分。在实验室前的工作中,最常报告的方面是样本量。在实验室工作中,实验室准备工作得分最低,为2分,阳性对照有49项研究得分为0分。在实验室后的工作中,大多数研究提供了粒子特性;然而,在聚合物颜色方面,有16项研究得到了0分。在实验室前和实验室工作中采取的步骤直接影响实验室后工作中数据的准确性和有效性。这些分数进一步反映了在方法方面需要更严格的质量保证和质量控制标准。未来的研究可以利用目前方法学方面的评估作为参考,以获得可靠和有效的微塑料数据,这将增加它们在毒性评估中使用的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Analytical Chemistry
Journal of Analytical Chemistry 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
146
审稿时长
13 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Analytical Chemistry is an international peer reviewed journal that covers theoretical and applied aspects of analytical chemistry; it informs the reader about new achievements in analytical methods, instruments and reagents. Ample space is devoted to problems arising in the analysis of vital media such as water and air. Consideration is given to the detection and determination of metal ions, anions, and various organic substances. The journal welcomes manuscripts from all countries in the English or Russian language.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信