Secondary natural vegetation gains in the Atlantic Forest do not offset losses of carbon stocks and conservation of priority areas

IF 4.4 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Ramon Felipe Bicudo da Silva , James D.A. Millington , Dou Yue , Maurício Humberto Vancine , Luiz Fernando Silva Magnago , Andrés Viña , Fu Bin , Margarita Huesca , Simone Aparecida Viera , Jianguo Liu
{"title":"Secondary natural vegetation gains in the Atlantic Forest do not offset losses of carbon stocks and conservation of priority areas","authors":"Ramon Felipe Bicudo da Silva ,&nbsp;James D.A. Millington ,&nbsp;Dou Yue ,&nbsp;Maurício Humberto Vancine ,&nbsp;Luiz Fernando Silva Magnago ,&nbsp;Andrés Viña ,&nbsp;Fu Bin ,&nbsp;Margarita Huesca ,&nbsp;Simone Aparecida Viera ,&nbsp;Jianguo Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Since secondary natural vegetation cover (NVC) constitutes an important factor for the provision of ecosystem services (e.g., helping to tackle both the climate and biodiversity crises), understanding its dynamics is essential for effective forest restoration. Yet, this has seldom been evaluated in prior studies. We examined 37 years (1985–2021) of primary NVC loss, secondary NVC dynamics (persistent and ephemeral regeneration), and their impacts on carbon stocks and on the conservation of priority areas in Brazil's Atlantic Forest biome, a global biodiversity hotspot. We developed a new framework analyzing spatial landscape configurations over time, and found that Atlantic Forest NVC decreased by 4.2 Mha driven by a gross loss of 12.8 Mha of primary NVC (~1.4 Gt of carbon lost). Secondary NVC gained 8.6 Mha (~0.170 Gt of carbon, with potential for ~0.987 Gt in 80 years) but ephemeral regeneration (i.e., loss of secondary NVC) resulted in a loss of 3.8 Mha. Deforestation caused a net loss of 1.2 Mha in priority conservation areas. Results of this study demonstrate that understanding the dynamics of ephemeral regeneration is important for evaluating restoration efforts and ecosystem services in the Atlantic Forest. Our study also demonstrates that secondary forest regeneration plays an important role in reconnecting landscapes, although its instability threatens biodiversity and ecosystem services as it fails to offset the loss of primary vegetation. Thus, halting deforestation remains the single most urgent and vital action to prevent irreversible biodiversity loss and reduce carbon emissions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55375,"journal":{"name":"Biological Conservation","volume":"312 ","pages":"Article 111512"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000632072500549X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since secondary natural vegetation cover (NVC) constitutes an important factor for the provision of ecosystem services (e.g., helping to tackle both the climate and biodiversity crises), understanding its dynamics is essential for effective forest restoration. Yet, this has seldom been evaluated in prior studies. We examined 37 years (1985–2021) of primary NVC loss, secondary NVC dynamics (persistent and ephemeral regeneration), and their impacts on carbon stocks and on the conservation of priority areas in Brazil's Atlantic Forest biome, a global biodiversity hotspot. We developed a new framework analyzing spatial landscape configurations over time, and found that Atlantic Forest NVC decreased by 4.2 Mha driven by a gross loss of 12.8 Mha of primary NVC (~1.4 Gt of carbon lost). Secondary NVC gained 8.6 Mha (~0.170 Gt of carbon, with potential for ~0.987 Gt in 80 years) but ephemeral regeneration (i.e., loss of secondary NVC) resulted in a loss of 3.8 Mha. Deforestation caused a net loss of 1.2 Mha in priority conservation areas. Results of this study demonstrate that understanding the dynamics of ephemeral regeneration is important for evaluating restoration efforts and ecosystem services in the Atlantic Forest. Our study also demonstrates that secondary forest regeneration plays an important role in reconnecting landscapes, although its instability threatens biodiversity and ecosystem services as it fails to offset the loss of primary vegetation. Thus, halting deforestation remains the single most urgent and vital action to prevent irreversible biodiversity loss and reduce carbon emissions.
大西洋森林次生自然植被的增加不能抵消碳储量的损失和优先区域的保护
由于次生自然植被覆盖(NVC)是提供生态系统服务(例如,帮助解决气候和生物多样性危机)的重要因素,因此了解其动态对于有效的森林恢复至关重要。然而,这在以前的研究中很少被评估。研究了全球生物多样性热点巴西大西洋森林生物群落37年(1985-2021)的初级NVC损失、次级NVC动态(持续更新和短暂更新)及其对碳储量和优先区域保护的影响。研究发现,大西洋森林NVC减少了4.2 Mha,主要是由于原始NVC总损失12.8 Mha(碳损失约1.4 Gt)。次生NVC增加了8.6 Mha (~0.170 Gt碳,80年可能增加~0.987 Gt碳),但短暂再生(即次生NVC的损失)导致3.8 Mha碳损失。森林砍伐造成优先保护区净损失120万公顷。研究结果表明,了解大西洋森林的短暂更新动态对评估恢复工作和生态系统服务具有重要意义。我们的研究还表明,次生林更新在重新连接景观方面发挥着重要作用,尽管它的不稳定性威胁着生物多样性和生态系统服务,因为它不能抵消原始植被的损失。因此,停止森林砍伐仍然是防止不可逆转的生物多样性丧失和减少碳排放的最紧迫和最重要的行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Conservation
Biological Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Biological Conservation is an international leading journal in the discipline of conservation biology. The journal publishes articles spanning a diverse range of fields that contribute to the biological, sociological, and economic dimensions of conservation and natural resource management. The primary aim of Biological Conservation is the publication of high-quality papers that advance the science and practice of conservation, or which demonstrate the application of conservation principles for natural resource management and policy. Therefore it will be of interest to a broad international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信