Svenja Dobelmann , Michael Thiel , Janina Kleemann
{"title":"Linking wildlife conservation with Nature's Contributions to People: The case of the European wildcat in German protected forests","authors":"Svenja Dobelmann , Michael Thiel , Janina Kleemann","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Forests provide essential benefits to human well-being, referred to as Nature's Contributions to People (NCP), including carbon storage, water filtration, biodiversity, and recreation. However, increasing human activities and land use changes have degraded wildlife habitats, threatening biodiversity and reducing NCP. This study presents a novel approach to assessing NCP by integrating keystone species-specific habitat assessment. It explores the synergies and trade-offs between the conservation of the European wildcat (<em>Felis silvestris silvestris</em>), an umbrella species promoting large and connected forest habitats, and the supply of forest-related NCP in German protected forests. Key factors influencing wildcat habitats are identified and their overlap with four selected NCP—carbon sequestration, water retention, timber potential, and recreation— are analyzed using remote sensing methodologies, including species distribution modelling and the InVEST water yield model, and statistical analysis, including correlations, spatial congruence, and k-means clustering, to assess synergies and trade-offs. The wildcat habitat model (AUC = 0.814) indicates that suitable habitats are structurally complex, densely forested landscapes that are distant from urban areas and roads but near agricultural land. Wildcat habitat provision shows a synergy with timber potential (ρ = 0.505) but low-to-moderate effects with other NCP (ρ range from −0.050 to 0.138). ANOVA results (<em>p</em> < 2.2e-16) indicate that national parks provide higher NCP levels than biosphere reserves and nature parks in the study areas. The results demonstrate that wildcat habitat provision does not conflict with other NCP, paving the way for further wildlife conservation measures and the establishment of more protection zones.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55375,"journal":{"name":"Biological Conservation","volume":"312 ","pages":"Article 111506"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320725005439","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Forests provide essential benefits to human well-being, referred to as Nature's Contributions to People (NCP), including carbon storage, water filtration, biodiversity, and recreation. However, increasing human activities and land use changes have degraded wildlife habitats, threatening biodiversity and reducing NCP. This study presents a novel approach to assessing NCP by integrating keystone species-specific habitat assessment. It explores the synergies and trade-offs between the conservation of the European wildcat (Felis silvestris silvestris), an umbrella species promoting large and connected forest habitats, and the supply of forest-related NCP in German protected forests. Key factors influencing wildcat habitats are identified and their overlap with four selected NCP—carbon sequestration, water retention, timber potential, and recreation— are analyzed using remote sensing methodologies, including species distribution modelling and the InVEST water yield model, and statistical analysis, including correlations, spatial congruence, and k-means clustering, to assess synergies and trade-offs. The wildcat habitat model (AUC = 0.814) indicates that suitable habitats are structurally complex, densely forested landscapes that are distant from urban areas and roads but near agricultural land. Wildcat habitat provision shows a synergy with timber potential (ρ = 0.505) but low-to-moderate effects with other NCP (ρ range from −0.050 to 0.138). ANOVA results (p < 2.2e-16) indicate that national parks provide higher NCP levels than biosphere reserves and nature parks in the study areas. The results demonstrate that wildcat habitat provision does not conflict with other NCP, paving the way for further wildlife conservation measures and the establishment of more protection zones.
期刊介绍:
Biological Conservation is an international leading journal in the discipline of conservation biology. The journal publishes articles spanning a diverse range of fields that contribute to the biological, sociological, and economic dimensions of conservation and natural resource management. The primary aim of Biological Conservation is the publication of high-quality papers that advance the science and practice of conservation, or which demonstrate the application of conservation principles for natural resource management and policy. Therefore it will be of interest to a broad international readership.