{"title":"Creep behaviour and confinement effects of circular steel tube confined reinforced concrete (STCRC) stub columns under high level of sustained loading","authors":"Yun-Long Guo , Yue Geng , Yu-Yin Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.121378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Steel tube confined reinforced concrete (STCRC) columns demonstrate superior static/dynamic performance and efficient beam-column joint construction, showing promising future in long-span structures, heavily loaded constructions and high-rise buildings. However, the non-linear creep behaviour of STCRC columns under possible high sustained loads for scenarios such as the upper limit release of the axial load ratio or long-term overloading remains insufficiently investigated, while it differs fundamentally from traditional concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) columns: the enhanced confinement effects in STCRC columns effectively suppress concrete cracking, while less prone cross-sectional stress redistribution may occur in STCRC columns owing to the less tube stiffness contribution caused by the disconnection at the beam-column joints. Hence, this study experimentally investigates the non-linear creep of circular STCRC stub columns under varying stress levels, concrete strengths, reinforcement ratios and steel tube ratios. Key mechanisms were explored, including the time-varying passive confining pressure and vertical tube stiffness. By comparing creep deformation of STCRC, CFST, and plain concrete specimens, the influence of confinement effects and tube stiffness were then quantified. A non-linear creep model incorporating concrete strength and confinement effects was proposed alongside a validated prediction analysis method. Results indicate that the non-linear creep increases the long-term deformation and longitudinal rebars stress by 57.0 %–85.5 %, rendering conventional linear creep analyses non-conservative. The confinement effects were non-negligible in STCRC columns under high sustained loading, causing obvious lower creep than that of plain concrete. The vertical tube stress caused by interfacial bond and friction always shows relatively small influence on the non-linear creep of STCRC stub columns, leading to 21.2 % higher creep than that of CFST columns. The proposed non-linear creep model and analysis method demonstrate high accuracy in predicting non-linear creep deformations of STCRC stub columns.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"344 ","pages":"Article 121378"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625017699","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Steel tube confined reinforced concrete (STCRC) columns demonstrate superior static/dynamic performance and efficient beam-column joint construction, showing promising future in long-span structures, heavily loaded constructions and high-rise buildings. However, the non-linear creep behaviour of STCRC columns under possible high sustained loads for scenarios such as the upper limit release of the axial load ratio or long-term overloading remains insufficiently investigated, while it differs fundamentally from traditional concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) columns: the enhanced confinement effects in STCRC columns effectively suppress concrete cracking, while less prone cross-sectional stress redistribution may occur in STCRC columns owing to the less tube stiffness contribution caused by the disconnection at the beam-column joints. Hence, this study experimentally investigates the non-linear creep of circular STCRC stub columns under varying stress levels, concrete strengths, reinforcement ratios and steel tube ratios. Key mechanisms were explored, including the time-varying passive confining pressure and vertical tube stiffness. By comparing creep deformation of STCRC, CFST, and plain concrete specimens, the influence of confinement effects and tube stiffness were then quantified. A non-linear creep model incorporating concrete strength and confinement effects was proposed alongside a validated prediction analysis method. Results indicate that the non-linear creep increases the long-term deformation and longitudinal rebars stress by 57.0 %–85.5 %, rendering conventional linear creep analyses non-conservative. The confinement effects were non-negligible in STCRC columns under high sustained loading, causing obvious lower creep than that of plain concrete. The vertical tube stress caused by interfacial bond and friction always shows relatively small influence on the non-linear creep of STCRC stub columns, leading to 21.2 % higher creep than that of CFST columns. The proposed non-linear creep model and analysis method demonstrate high accuracy in predicting non-linear creep deformations of STCRC stub columns.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed.
The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering.
Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels.
Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.