Creep behaviour and confinement effects of circular steel tube confined reinforced concrete (STCRC) stub columns under high level of sustained loading

IF 6.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Yun-Long Guo , Yue Geng , Yu-Yin Wang
{"title":"Creep behaviour and confinement effects of circular steel tube confined reinforced concrete (STCRC) stub columns under high level of sustained loading","authors":"Yun-Long Guo ,&nbsp;Yue Geng ,&nbsp;Yu-Yin Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.121378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Steel tube confined reinforced concrete (STCRC) columns demonstrate superior static/dynamic performance and efficient beam-column joint construction, showing promising future in long-span structures, heavily loaded constructions and high-rise buildings. However, the non-linear creep behaviour of STCRC columns under possible high sustained loads for scenarios such as the upper limit release of the axial load ratio or long-term overloading remains insufficiently investigated, while it differs fundamentally from traditional concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) columns: the enhanced confinement effects in STCRC columns effectively suppress concrete cracking, while less prone cross-sectional stress redistribution may occur in STCRC columns owing to the less tube stiffness contribution caused by the disconnection at the beam-column joints. Hence, this study experimentally investigates the non-linear creep of circular STCRC stub columns under varying stress levels, concrete strengths, reinforcement ratios and steel tube ratios. Key mechanisms were explored, including the time-varying passive confining pressure and vertical tube stiffness. By comparing creep deformation of STCRC, CFST, and plain concrete specimens, the influence of confinement effects and tube stiffness were then quantified. A non-linear creep model incorporating concrete strength and confinement effects was proposed alongside a validated prediction analysis method. Results indicate that the non-linear creep increases the long-term deformation and longitudinal rebars stress by 57.0 %–85.5 %, rendering conventional linear creep analyses non-conservative. The confinement effects were non-negligible in STCRC columns under high sustained loading, causing obvious lower creep than that of plain concrete. The vertical tube stress caused by interfacial bond and friction always shows relatively small influence on the non-linear creep of STCRC stub columns, leading to 21.2 % higher creep than that of CFST columns. The proposed non-linear creep model and analysis method demonstrate high accuracy in predicting non-linear creep deformations of STCRC stub columns.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"344 ","pages":"Article 121378"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625017699","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Steel tube confined reinforced concrete (STCRC) columns demonstrate superior static/dynamic performance and efficient beam-column joint construction, showing promising future in long-span structures, heavily loaded constructions and high-rise buildings. However, the non-linear creep behaviour of STCRC columns under possible high sustained loads for scenarios such as the upper limit release of the axial load ratio or long-term overloading remains insufficiently investigated, while it differs fundamentally from traditional concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) columns: the enhanced confinement effects in STCRC columns effectively suppress concrete cracking, while less prone cross-sectional stress redistribution may occur in STCRC columns owing to the less tube stiffness contribution caused by the disconnection at the beam-column joints. Hence, this study experimentally investigates the non-linear creep of circular STCRC stub columns under varying stress levels, concrete strengths, reinforcement ratios and steel tube ratios. Key mechanisms were explored, including the time-varying passive confining pressure and vertical tube stiffness. By comparing creep deformation of STCRC, CFST, and plain concrete specimens, the influence of confinement effects and tube stiffness were then quantified. A non-linear creep model incorporating concrete strength and confinement effects was proposed alongside a validated prediction analysis method. Results indicate that the non-linear creep increases the long-term deformation and longitudinal rebars stress by 57.0 %–85.5 %, rendering conventional linear creep analyses non-conservative. The confinement effects were non-negligible in STCRC columns under high sustained loading, causing obvious lower creep than that of plain concrete. The vertical tube stress caused by interfacial bond and friction always shows relatively small influence on the non-linear creep of STCRC stub columns, leading to 21.2 % higher creep than that of CFST columns. The proposed non-linear creep model and analysis method demonstrate high accuracy in predicting non-linear creep deformations of STCRC stub columns.
高持续荷载作用下圆钢管约束钢筋混凝土短柱蠕变特性及约束效应
钢管约束钢筋混凝土(STCRC)柱具有良好的静动力性能和高效的梁柱节点结构,在大跨度结构、大荷载结构和高层建筑中具有广阔的应用前景。然而,在轴向荷载比上限释放或长期超载等可能的高持续荷载情况下,STCRC柱的非线性徐变行为仍未得到充分研究,尽管它与传统钢管混凝土(CFST)柱有根本不同:STCRC柱的约束效应增强,有效抑制了混凝土开裂,而由于在梁柱节点处断开导致的管刚度贡献较小,STCRC柱不太容易发生截面应力重分布。因此,本研究对圆形STCRC短柱在不同应力水平、混凝土强度、配筋率和钢管比下的非线性蠕变进行了实验研究。探讨了随时间变化的被动围压和垂直管刚度等关键机理。通过比较STCRC、CFST和素混凝土试件的徐变变形,量化约束效应和筒体刚度对试件徐变变形的影响。提出了考虑混凝土强度和约束效应的非线性徐变模型,并提出了一种有效的预测分析方法。结果表明,非线性蠕变使钢筋的长期变形和纵向应力增加57.0 % ~ 85.5 %,使传统的线性蠕变分析变得不保守。在高持续荷载作用下,STCRC柱的约束效应不可忽视,其徐变明显低于素混凝土。界面粘结和摩擦引起的垂管应力对STCRC短柱非线性蠕变的影响始终较小,导致其蠕变比CFST高21.2% %。所提出的非线性蠕变模型和分析方法对STCRC短柱的非线性蠕变变形具有较高的预测精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Engineering Structures
Engineering Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.50%
发文量
1385
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed. The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering. Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels. Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信