From hedge to risk: Nonlinear effects of climate policy uncertainty on corporate biodiversity exposure

IF 14.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Tian Hao , Lizhuo Zhou , Peng Hu , Tongpu Zhao , Peiqiong Wang
{"title":"From hedge to risk: Nonlinear effects of climate policy uncertainty on corporate biodiversity exposure","authors":"Tian Hao ,&nbsp;Lizhuo Zhou ,&nbsp;Peng Hu ,&nbsp;Tongpu Zhao ,&nbsp;Peiqiong Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While climate policy uncertainty has been widely studied in relation to corporate environmental practices, its impact on biodiversity exposure remains underexplored. This study addresses this gap by constructing quantitative indices of policy uncertainty and biodiversity exposure using spatial data from Chinese A-share listed firms and nature reserves from 2003 to 2023. We document an inverted U-shaped relationship: at moderate levels of uncertainty, firms tend to increase biodiversity engagement to hedge against potential regulatory risks; at higher levels, however, firms reduce ecological investments, leading to greater biodiversity exposure. Notably, strong internal governance and rigorous external regulation significantly mitigate the rise in biodiversity exposure under high uncertainty by fostering more stable and consistent environmental management. These moderating effects highlight the crucial role of governance and regulatory oversight in shaping corporate response to ecological risks. Our findings provide new empirical evidence on the behavioral dynamics of firms facing ecological risks and offer policy-relevant insights for improving environmental governance in uncertain regulatory environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"151 ","pages":"Article 108885"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325007121","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While climate policy uncertainty has been widely studied in relation to corporate environmental practices, its impact on biodiversity exposure remains underexplored. This study addresses this gap by constructing quantitative indices of policy uncertainty and biodiversity exposure using spatial data from Chinese A-share listed firms and nature reserves from 2003 to 2023. We document an inverted U-shaped relationship: at moderate levels of uncertainty, firms tend to increase biodiversity engagement to hedge against potential regulatory risks; at higher levels, however, firms reduce ecological investments, leading to greater biodiversity exposure. Notably, strong internal governance and rigorous external regulation significantly mitigate the rise in biodiversity exposure under high uncertainty by fostering more stable and consistent environmental management. These moderating effects highlight the crucial role of governance and regulatory oversight in shaping corporate response to ecological risks. Our findings provide new empirical evidence on the behavioral dynamics of firms facing ecological risks and offer policy-relevant insights for improving environmental governance in uncertain regulatory environments.
从对冲到风险:气候政策不确定性对企业生物多样性风险的非线性影响
虽然气候政策的不确定性已被广泛研究与企业环境实践的关系,但其对生物多样性暴露的影响仍未得到充分探讨。本研究利用2003 - 2023年中国a股上市公司和自然保护区的空间数据,构建了政策不确定性和生物多样性暴露的定量指标,弥补了这一空白。我们记录了一个倒u型关系:在中等不确定性水平下,企业倾向于增加生物多样性参与,以对冲潜在的监管风险;然而,在较高水平上,企业减少生态投资,导致更大的生物多样性暴露。值得注意的是,强有力的内部治理和严格的外部监管通过促进更稳定和一致的环境管理,显著缓解了高不确定性下生物多样性暴露的上升。这些调节效应突出了治理和监管监督在塑造企业对生态风险的反应方面的关键作用。我们的研究结果为面临生态风险的企业行为动力学提供了新的经验证据,并为在不确定的监管环境下改善环境治理提供了政策相关的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信