Statistical Inference of Weighted Extropy Under Outlier Influence: An MCMC Approach with Data Applications

IF 3.3 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Amal S. Hassan , Eslam Abdelhakim Seyam , Said G. Nassr , Rokaya Elmorsy Mohamed
{"title":"Statistical Inference of Weighted Extropy Under Outlier Influence: An MCMC Approach with Data Applications","authors":"Amal S. Hassan ,&nbsp;Eslam Abdelhakim Seyam ,&nbsp;Said G. Nassr ,&nbsp;Rokaya Elmorsy Mohamed","doi":"10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Extropy has recently become a focal point of study as a measure of uncertainty in probability distributions and serves as the dual complement to entropy. This paper suggests estimating extropy and weighted extropy for the power function distribution in the presence of outliers. Both Bayesian and conventional estimating methods are recommended. The Bayesian estimators for the extropy measures are produced for both symmetric and asymmetric loss functions using partially informative and non-informative priors. Bayesian estimates are calculated using a method called the Gibbs sampler, which is part of the Markov chain Monte Carlo approach. Extensive simulations evaluated with certain precision metrics display the results of empirical Bayesian and non-Bayesian extropy estimates when <em>k</em> outliers are presented. Under a symmetric loss function, Bayesian estimates of both extropy measures performed better than those under the linear exponential and minimal expected loss functions in the majority of simulation study situations. It can be concluded that Bayesian estimates based on the minimum expected loss function performed the poorest in both homogeneous (non-outlier) and outlier situations. According to the simulation research, larger sample sizes led to appreciable improvements in key accuracy metrics for all extropy estimates. Across all outlier and homogeneous case scenarios, the accuracy measures of the Bayesian estimates have the lowest values in the case of a partially informative prior compared to the others in the non-informative prior case. The effectiveness of the recommended methods is shown by applications to real datasets, such as failure times of air conditioning systems and lifetimes of electronic tubes. The aforementioned examples demonstrate the versatility and use of extropy and weighted extropy measures in simulating uncertainty and reliability in the field of reliability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21690,"journal":{"name":"Scientific African","volume":"30 ","pages":"Article e02919"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific African","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468227625003898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extropy has recently become a focal point of study as a measure of uncertainty in probability distributions and serves as the dual complement to entropy. This paper suggests estimating extropy and weighted extropy for the power function distribution in the presence of outliers. Both Bayesian and conventional estimating methods are recommended. The Bayesian estimators for the extropy measures are produced for both symmetric and asymmetric loss functions using partially informative and non-informative priors. Bayesian estimates are calculated using a method called the Gibbs sampler, which is part of the Markov chain Monte Carlo approach. Extensive simulations evaluated with certain precision metrics display the results of empirical Bayesian and non-Bayesian extropy estimates when k outliers are presented. Under a symmetric loss function, Bayesian estimates of both extropy measures performed better than those under the linear exponential and minimal expected loss functions in the majority of simulation study situations. It can be concluded that Bayesian estimates based on the minimum expected loss function performed the poorest in both homogeneous (non-outlier) and outlier situations. According to the simulation research, larger sample sizes led to appreciable improvements in key accuracy metrics for all extropy estimates. Across all outlier and homogeneous case scenarios, the accuracy measures of the Bayesian estimates have the lowest values in the case of a partially informative prior compared to the others in the non-informative prior case. The effectiveness of the recommended methods is shown by applications to real datasets, such as failure times of air conditioning systems and lifetimes of electronic tubes. The aforementioned examples demonstrate the versatility and use of extropy and weighted extropy measures in simulating uncertainty and reliability in the field of reliability.
离群值影响下加权熵的统计推断:一种数据应用的MCMC方法
最近,熵作为概率分布中不确定性的度量成为研究的焦点,并作为熵的双重补充。对于存在异常值的幂函数分布,本文提出了估计熵值和加权熵值的方法。推荐使用贝叶斯和传统的估计方法。利用部分信息先验和非信息先验分别对对称和非对称损失函数给出了熵测度的贝叶斯估计。贝叶斯估计是用一种叫做吉布斯采样器的方法计算的,这是马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗方法的一部分。广泛的模拟评估与一定的精度指标显示经验贝叶斯和非贝叶斯外向估计的结果,当k异常值提出。在大多数模拟研究情况下,对称损失函数下两种外向性测度的贝叶斯估计都优于线性指数和最小期望损失函数下的贝叶斯估计。可以得出结论,基于最小期望损失函数的贝叶斯估计在齐次(非离群值)和离群值情况下都表现最差。根据模拟研究,更大的样本量导致所有外向性估计的关键精度指标有明显的改善。在所有离群值和同质情况下,与非信息先验情况下的其他情况相比,部分信息先验情况下贝叶斯估计的准确性测量值最低。通过对实际数据集的应用,如空调系统的故障次数和电子管的寿命,证明了所推荐方法的有效性。上述例子表明,在可靠性领域中,外向性和加权外向性度量在模拟不确定性和可靠性方面的通用性和应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientific African
Scientific African Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
332
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信