When adults play, futures unravel: Towards the ethnography of future-making through play-centric methodology in rural Africa

IF 3.8 3区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Saymore Ngonidzashe Kativu , Glory Ernest Mella , Castrow Muunda , Anna-Katharina Hornidge
{"title":"When adults play, futures unravel: Towards the ethnography of future-making through play-centric methodology in rural Africa","authors":"Saymore Ngonidzashe Kativu ,&nbsp;Glory Ernest Mella ,&nbsp;Castrow Muunda ,&nbsp;Anna-Katharina Hornidge","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As futures studies continue gaining prominence in the social sciences, questions arise about futuremaking methodologies, about how to solicit and comprehend societal aspirations, visions and actions with which individuals and communities make the future a subject of the present. Questions such as “What are your aspirations or visions for the future?” often entice inadequate responses within future-centric ethnographic studies. Drawing from sociology, environmental studies, the arts, and the disciplines of economics and geography, we depart in search of an ethnographic methodology with which to effectively solicit, organize and make sense of future-making by those at the margins. We combine artefacts and playfulness among adults to socially study futures. We draw empirically on two focus group discussions, a regular discussion workshop and three future-making workshops employing artefacts and participatory playful interactions in rural Tanzania and Namibia to propose a methodology towards succinct responses to difficult ethnographic questions about futures. These are questions outside the capacity for mundane responses, whose answers are rarely actively thought out by groups such as smallholder farmers and rural communities. Using the Lego Identity and Landscape Set (LILS) as utility artifacts for ethnographic inquiry, we outline a methodology enabling smallholder farmers to tell their stories of the future, as rooted in their evolving landscapes and, accordingly, their socioecological systems. A landscape-centric lens aids the understanding of the social-ecologies in which futures unravel. We highlight the methodology’s applicability outside the rural realm, generally towards ethnographies of futures, placing emphasis on the agency of marginalized groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 103700"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Futures","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328725001612","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As futures studies continue gaining prominence in the social sciences, questions arise about futuremaking methodologies, about how to solicit and comprehend societal aspirations, visions and actions with which individuals and communities make the future a subject of the present. Questions such as “What are your aspirations or visions for the future?” often entice inadequate responses within future-centric ethnographic studies. Drawing from sociology, environmental studies, the arts, and the disciplines of economics and geography, we depart in search of an ethnographic methodology with which to effectively solicit, organize and make sense of future-making by those at the margins. We combine artefacts and playfulness among adults to socially study futures. We draw empirically on two focus group discussions, a regular discussion workshop and three future-making workshops employing artefacts and participatory playful interactions in rural Tanzania and Namibia to propose a methodology towards succinct responses to difficult ethnographic questions about futures. These are questions outside the capacity for mundane responses, whose answers are rarely actively thought out by groups such as smallholder farmers and rural communities. Using the Lego Identity and Landscape Set (LILS) as utility artifacts for ethnographic inquiry, we outline a methodology enabling smallholder farmers to tell their stories of the future, as rooted in their evolving landscapes and, accordingly, their socioecological systems. A landscape-centric lens aids the understanding of the social-ecologies in which futures unravel. We highlight the methodology’s applicability outside the rural realm, generally towards ethnographies of futures, placing emphasis on the agency of marginalized groups.
当成年人玩耍时,未来就会瓦解:通过非洲农村以游戏为中心的方法,走向未来创造的民族志
随着未来研究在社会科学中不断获得突出地位,关于未来制定方法的问题出现了,关于如何征求和理解社会的愿望,愿景和行动,个人和社区使未来成为现在的主题。在以未来为中心的民族志研究中,诸如“你对未来的愿望或愿景是什么?”这样的问题往往会引起不充分的回应。我们从社会学、环境研究、艺术、经济学和地理学等学科出发,寻找一种民族志方法论,用它来有效地征求、组织和理解边缘人群的未来。我们将人工制品和成年人的玩乐结合起来,从社会角度研究未来。我们从坦桑尼亚和纳米比亚农村的两次焦点小组讨论、一次定期讨论研讨会和三次利用人工制品和参与式有趣互动的未来制作研讨会中汲取经验,提出了一种方法,以简洁地回答有关未来的困难人种学问题。这些问题超出了普通人的回答能力,小农户和农村社区等群体很少积极思考这些问题的答案。利用乐高身份和景观集(LILS)作为民族志调查的实用器物,我们概述了一种方法,使小农能够讲述他们未来的故事,这些故事植根于他们不断发展的景观和相应的社会生态系统。以景观为中心的视角有助于理解未来的社会生态学。我们强调了该方法在农村领域之外的适用性,通常用于未来的民族志,强调边缘化群体的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Futures
Futures Multiple-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: Futures is an international, refereed, multidisciplinary journal concerned with medium and long-term futures of cultures and societies, science and technology, economics and politics, environment and the planet and individuals and humanity. Covering methods and practices of futures studies, the journal seeks to examine possible and alternative futures of all human endeavours. Futures seeks to promote divergent and pluralistic visions, ideas and opinions about the future. The editors do not necessarily agree with the views expressed in the pages of Futures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信