Exploring cross-national variations in traffic safety culture: Insights into mobile phone use and shared beliefs across 31 countries

IF 3.3 Q3 TRANSPORTATION
Uta Meesmann , Carlos Pires , Naomi Wardenier , Mario Cools
{"title":"Exploring cross-national variations in traffic safety culture: Insights into mobile phone use and shared beliefs across 31 countries","authors":"Uta Meesmann ,&nbsp;Carlos Pires ,&nbsp;Naomi Wardenier ,&nbsp;Mario Cools","doi":"10.1016/j.iatssr.2025.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates cross-national differences in <em>Traffic Safety Culture</em> (TSC) by examining self-reported mobile phone use while driving across 31 countries. Using data from the third edition of the E-Survey of Road Users' Attitudes (ESRA3), collected in 2023, this research explores how socio-cognitive constructs, including <em>norms</em>, <em>perceived behavioural control</em> (PBC), <em>attitude</em>, and <em>intention,</em> influence drivers' mobile phone use while driving. Linear regression models are applied at both cross-national and national levels to understand the predictive strength of these constructs. Results indicate that socio-cognitive beliefs significantly explain variations in self-reported mobile phone use while driving, accounting for 37–63 % of the observed variance. <em>Norms</em> emerge as the strongest predictor, followed by <em>PBC</em>, <em>attitude</em>, and <em>intention</em>, with substantial differences in effect size across countries. These findings underscore the role of cultural and psychological factors in shaping unsafe driving behaviours, offering insights for tailored interventions that address specific socio-cognitive aspects of high-risk drivers, which can be used to design road safety campaigns or education programs more effectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47059,"journal":{"name":"IATSS Research","volume":"49 3","pages":"Pages 399-409"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IATSS Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0386111225000342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates cross-national differences in Traffic Safety Culture (TSC) by examining self-reported mobile phone use while driving across 31 countries. Using data from the third edition of the E-Survey of Road Users' Attitudes (ESRA3), collected in 2023, this research explores how socio-cognitive constructs, including norms, perceived behavioural control (PBC), attitude, and intention, influence drivers' mobile phone use while driving. Linear regression models are applied at both cross-national and national levels to understand the predictive strength of these constructs. Results indicate that socio-cognitive beliefs significantly explain variations in self-reported mobile phone use while driving, accounting for 37–63 % of the observed variance. Norms emerge as the strongest predictor, followed by PBC, attitude, and intention, with substantial differences in effect size across countries. These findings underscore the role of cultural and psychological factors in shaping unsafe driving behaviours, offering insights for tailored interventions that address specific socio-cognitive aspects of high-risk drivers, which can be used to design road safety campaigns or education programs more effectively.
探索交通安全文化的跨国差异:对31个国家移动电话使用和共同信念的洞察
本研究通过调查31个国家驾驶时使用手机的自我报告,调查了交通安全文化(TSC)的跨国差异。本研究利用2023年收集的第三版道路使用者态度电子调查(ESRA3)的数据,探讨了包括规范、感知行为控制(PBC)、态度和意图在内的社会认知结构如何影响驾驶员在驾驶时使用手机。线性回归模型应用于跨国和国家层面,以了解这些结构的预测强度。结果表明,社会认知信念显著地解释了自述驾驶时使用手机的差异,占观察到的方差的37 - 63%。规范是最强的预测因子,其次是PBC、态度和意图,各国的效应大小存在很大差异。这些发现强调了文化和心理因素在形成不安全驾驶行为方面的作用,为针对高风险驾驶员的特定社会认知方面的量身定制干预措施提供了见解,这些干预措施可用于更有效地设计道路安全运动或教育方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IATSS Research
IATSS Research TRANSPORTATION-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
44
审稿时长
42 weeks
期刊介绍: First published in 1977 as an international journal sponsored by the International Association of Traffic and Safety Sciences, IATSS Research has contributed to the dissemination of interdisciplinary wisdom on ideal mobility, particularly in Asia. IATSS Research is an international refereed journal providing a platform for the exchange of scientific findings on transportation and safety across a wide range of academic fields, with particular emphasis on the links between scientific findings and practice in society and cultural contexts. IATSS Research welcomes submission of original research articles and reviews that satisfy the following conditions: 1.Relevant to transportation and safety, and the multiple impacts of transportation systems on security, human health, and the environment. 2.Contains important policy and practical implications based on scientific evidence in the applicable academic field. In addition to welcoming general submissions, IATSS Research occasionally plans and publishes special feature sections and special issues composed of invited articles addressing specific topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信