Delineation of groundwater potential zones of India using GIS based Fuzzy-AHP techniques

IF 5.6 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Manish Kumar , Alka Dash , Syed Irtiza Majid , Akash Tiwari , Sourav Bhadwal , Netrananda Sahu
{"title":"Delineation of groundwater potential zones of India using GIS based Fuzzy-AHP techniques","authors":"Manish Kumar ,&nbsp;Alka Dash ,&nbsp;Syed Irtiza Majid ,&nbsp;Akash Tiwari ,&nbsp;Sourav Bhadwal ,&nbsp;Netrananda Sahu","doi":"10.1016/j.indic.2025.100932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>India's subtropical monsoon climate, rapid population growth, urban expansion, and industrial development pose long-term challenges to sustainable groundwater management. In this study, GIS-based Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy-AHP) has been employed to delineate Groundwater Potential (GWP) zones of India at national and state levels. Ten hydro-meteorological and physiographic factors were used and the resulting GWP zonation indicated that high, moderate, and low GWP zones encompass 27.43 %, 42.25 %, and 30.32 % of India's territory, respectively. High GWP zones are concentrated in the Indo-Gangetic plains, coastal regions, and scattered interiors, with states such as Tripura, Bihar, Punjab, Assam, West Bengal, and Uttar Pradesh having a majority of high GWP areas. Hilly states exhibit low GWP, while regions with consolidated formations display extremely low GWP. Moderate GWP is observed in Manipur and Nagaland due to high rainfall and uneven slopes. The reliability of the GWP map was validated with precision, recall, F1-score, F2-score, and accuracy scores of 0.67, 0.75, 0.71, 0.73, and 0.78, respectively. Probabilistic performance metrics of AUC-ROC = 0.86 and AUC-PR = 0.85 supported the performance metrics scores. The AUC-SR score indicated strong spatial prioritization capability of the GWP map, as nearly 70 % of validation locations were captured within the top 50 % of the GWP zones of this study. The domain knowledge of experts and the sensitivity analysis highlighted aquifers, drainage density, and groundwater depth as the most influential factors driving India's GWP, whereas LULC contributed with the minimal impact. This study offers a decision-support tool for informed groundwater planning and sustainable water resource management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36171,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article 100932"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972725003538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

India's subtropical monsoon climate, rapid population growth, urban expansion, and industrial development pose long-term challenges to sustainable groundwater management. In this study, GIS-based Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy-AHP) has been employed to delineate Groundwater Potential (GWP) zones of India at national and state levels. Ten hydro-meteorological and physiographic factors were used and the resulting GWP zonation indicated that high, moderate, and low GWP zones encompass 27.43 %, 42.25 %, and 30.32 % of India's territory, respectively. High GWP zones are concentrated in the Indo-Gangetic plains, coastal regions, and scattered interiors, with states such as Tripura, Bihar, Punjab, Assam, West Bengal, and Uttar Pradesh having a majority of high GWP areas. Hilly states exhibit low GWP, while regions with consolidated formations display extremely low GWP. Moderate GWP is observed in Manipur and Nagaland due to high rainfall and uneven slopes. The reliability of the GWP map was validated with precision, recall, F1-score, F2-score, and accuracy scores of 0.67, 0.75, 0.71, 0.73, and 0.78, respectively. Probabilistic performance metrics of AUC-ROC = 0.86 and AUC-PR = 0.85 supported the performance metrics scores. The AUC-SR score indicated strong spatial prioritization capability of the GWP map, as nearly 70 % of validation locations were captured within the top 50 % of the GWP zones of this study. The domain knowledge of experts and the sensitivity analysis highlighted aquifers, drainage density, and groundwater depth as the most influential factors driving India's GWP, whereas LULC contributed with the minimal impact. This study offers a decision-support tool for informed groundwater planning and sustainable water resource management.
利用基于GIS的模糊层次分析法圈定印度地下水潜势带
印度的亚热带季风气候、快速的人口增长、城市扩张和工业发展给可持续地下水管理带来了长期挑战。本文采用基于gis的模糊层次分析法(Fuzzy- ahp)在印度全国和各邦划分地下水潜势区。使用了10个水文气象和地理因子,得到的GWP分区表明,高、中、低GWP区分别占印度领土的27.43%、42.25%和30.32%。全球升温潜能值高的地区集中在印度-恒河平原、沿海地区和分散的内陆地区,像特里普拉邦、比哈尔邦、旁遮普邦、阿萨姆邦、西孟加拉邦和北方邦这样的邦拥有大部分的全球升温潜能值高的地区。丘陵地区的GWP值较低,而固结地层地区的GWP值极低。在曼尼普尔邦和那加兰邦,由于高降雨量和不平坦的斜坡,观察到中等的全球变暖潜值。以精密度、召回率、f1评分、f2评分和准确度评分分别为0.67、0.75、0.71、0.73和0.78,验证了GWP图的可靠性。AUC-ROC = 0.86和AUC-PR = 0.85的概率绩效指标支持绩效指标得分。AUC-SR得分表明,该地图具有较强的空间优先级能力,因为近70%的验证位置位于该研究的GWP区域的前50%内。专家的领域知识和敏感性分析强调,含水层、排水密度和地下水深度是影响印度全球潜能值的最重要因素,而LULC的影响最小。该研究为地下水规划和水资源可持续管理提供了决策支持工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
49
审稿时长
57 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信