Corporate governance mechanisms and non-financial disclosure quality: Evidence from sustainability committee, external CSR assurance, and stakeholder engagement

IF 9.8 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Ishwar Khatri , Paul Einar Giskås , Anneli Kalliainen Kyrrø , Frode Kjærland
{"title":"Corporate governance mechanisms and non-financial disclosure quality: Evidence from sustainability committee, external CSR assurance, and stakeholder engagement","authors":"Ishwar Khatri ,&nbsp;Paul Einar Giskås ,&nbsp;Anneli Kalliainen Kyrrø ,&nbsp;Frode Kjærland","doi":"10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper investigates the relationship between corporate governance mechanisms and the quality of non-financial disclosures. Specifically, we examine whether the presence of a sustainability board committee, third-party assurance, and stakeholder engagement practices are associated with disclosure quality, measured by abnormal non-financial disclosures. Using a hand-collected dataset of 1089 annual reports from Swedish listed companies between 2013 and 2021, our study reveals that the existence of sustainability committees and stakeholder engagement practices tends to reduce abnormal non-financial disclosures, while third-party assurance appears insignificant. In additional analyses, we examine how these governance mechanisms interact when combined and find that the main results persist even after accounting for interaction effects, though the effects of interactions themselves are inconsistent. Furthermore, we assess the relationship before and after the mandatory non-financial reporting regulation under EU Directive 2014/95/EU. Our findings suggest that the regulation substitutes the role of sustainability committees but complements stakeholder engagement. Overall, our study indicates that these corporate governance mechanisms can serve as effective alternative tools for enhancing the quality of non-financial disclosures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48226,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Financial Analysis","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 104645"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Financial Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105752192500732X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates the relationship between corporate governance mechanisms and the quality of non-financial disclosures. Specifically, we examine whether the presence of a sustainability board committee, third-party assurance, and stakeholder engagement practices are associated with disclosure quality, measured by abnormal non-financial disclosures. Using a hand-collected dataset of 1089 annual reports from Swedish listed companies between 2013 and 2021, our study reveals that the existence of sustainability committees and stakeholder engagement practices tends to reduce abnormal non-financial disclosures, while third-party assurance appears insignificant. In additional analyses, we examine how these governance mechanisms interact when combined and find that the main results persist even after accounting for interaction effects, though the effects of interactions themselves are inconsistent. Furthermore, we assess the relationship before and after the mandatory non-financial reporting regulation under EU Directive 2014/95/EU. Our findings suggest that the regulation substitutes the role of sustainability committees but complements stakeholder engagement. Overall, our study indicates that these corporate governance mechanisms can serve as effective alternative tools for enhancing the quality of non-financial disclosures.
公司治理机制与非财务披露质量:来自可持续发展委员会、外部CSR保证和利益相关者参与的证据
本文研究了公司治理机制与非财务信息披露质量之间的关系。具体而言,我们考察了可持续发展董事会委员会、第三方鉴证和利益相关者参与实践的存在是否与披露质量(通过异常的非财务披露来衡量)相关。利用2013年至2021年期间瑞典上市公司1089份年报的手工收集数据集,我们的研究表明,可持续发展委员会和利益相关者参与实践的存在往往会减少异常的非财务披露,而第三方保证则显得微不足道。在其他分析中,我们检查了这些治理机制在组合时是如何相互作用的,并发现即使在考虑了相互作用的影响之后,主要结果仍然存在,尽管相互作用本身的影响是不一致的。此外,我们评估了欧盟指令2014/95/EU下强制性非财务报告法规前后的关系。我们的研究结果表明,监管取代了可持续发展委员会的作用,但补充了利益相关者的参与。总体而言,我们的研究表明,这些公司治理机制可以作为提高非财务披露质量的有效替代工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
366
期刊介绍: The International Review of Financial Analysis (IRFA) is an impartial refereed journal designed to serve as a platform for high-quality financial research. It welcomes a diverse range of financial research topics and maintains an unbiased selection process. While not limited to U.S.-centric subjects, IRFA, as its title suggests, is open to valuable research contributions from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信