Bounded rational decision-making modeling and analysis in local energy markets: A state-of-the-art review

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Yuanxing Xia , Ke Wang , Yu Huang , Tinjun Lin , Linjun Shi , Feng Wu
{"title":"Bounded rational decision-making modeling and analysis in local energy markets: A state-of-the-art review","authors":"Yuanxing Xia ,&nbsp;Ke Wang ,&nbsp;Yu Huang ,&nbsp;Tinjun Lin ,&nbsp;Linjun Shi ,&nbsp;Feng Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.116310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The prevailing literature typically models energy prosumers in local energy markets (LEMs) as fully rational actors whose primary goal is to maximize economic profits. However, this assumption neglects the fact that LEM participants are predominantly small-scale residential users, whose decisions are often shaped by bounded rationality due to limited information, cognitive constraints, and low transaction expertise. They exhibit subjective preferences, leading to decision-making that deviates from theoretical optima. This interdisciplinary review systematically investigates the bounded rationality factors influencing prosumers’ decision-making in LEMs. This study integrates behavioral economics, game theory, and incomplete information to model irrational decision-making in local energy markets (LEMs). These models are applied across heterogeneous market levels to capture the diversity of trading behaviors. An online survey in China and subsequent empirical analysis validate the theoretical assumptions, offering evidence-based insights for policy design to improve LEM efficiency and sustainability. Our findings provide critical insights into LEM participant behavior, leading to policy recommendations aimed at enhancing market efficiency and sustainability. This study outlines prospects for sustainable development, identifies open research questions, and proposes future research directions, thereby contributing significantly to the discourse on LEMs and their role in the broader energy transition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"226 ","pages":"Article 116310"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125009839","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prevailing literature typically models energy prosumers in local energy markets (LEMs) as fully rational actors whose primary goal is to maximize economic profits. However, this assumption neglects the fact that LEM participants are predominantly small-scale residential users, whose decisions are often shaped by bounded rationality due to limited information, cognitive constraints, and low transaction expertise. They exhibit subjective preferences, leading to decision-making that deviates from theoretical optima. This interdisciplinary review systematically investigates the bounded rationality factors influencing prosumers’ decision-making in LEMs. This study integrates behavioral economics, game theory, and incomplete information to model irrational decision-making in local energy markets (LEMs). These models are applied across heterogeneous market levels to capture the diversity of trading behaviors. An online survey in China and subsequent empirical analysis validate the theoretical assumptions, offering evidence-based insights for policy design to improve LEM efficiency and sustainability. Our findings provide critical insights into LEM participant behavior, leading to policy recommendations aimed at enhancing market efficiency and sustainability. This study outlines prospects for sustainable development, identifies open research questions, and proposes future research directions, thereby contributing significantly to the discourse on LEMs and their role in the broader energy transition.
局部能源市场的有限理性决策模型与分析:最新研究综述
主流文献典型地将当地能源市场(LEMs)中的能源消费者建模为完全理性的行为者,其主要目标是最大化经济利润。然而,这一假设忽略了这样一个事实,即LEM参与者主要是小规模住宅用户,由于有限的信息、认知约束和低交易专业知识,他们的决策往往受到有限理性的影响。他们表现出主观偏好,导致决策偏离理论最优。本跨学科综述系统地探讨了有限理性因素对生产消费者决策的影响。本研究将行为经济学、博弈论和不完全信息理论整合到局部能源市场的非理性决策模型中。这些模型被应用于不同的市场层次,以捕捉交易行为的多样性。中国的一项在线调查和随后的实证分析验证了理论假设,为提高LEM效率和可持续性的政策设计提供了基于证据的见解。我们的研究结果为LEM参与者的行为提供了重要的见解,从而提出了旨在提高市场效率和可持续性的政策建议。本研究概述了可持续发展的前景,确定了开放的研究问题,并提出了未来的研究方向,从而对lem及其在更广泛的能源转型中的作用的论述做出了重大贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信