The effectiveness of an educational intervention on adolescents’ understanding of radiation therapy

IF 2.8 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
K. Murphy , T. O'Donovan , A. Devine , A. Barry , A. England , M. McEntee
{"title":"The effectiveness of an educational intervention on adolescents’ understanding of radiation therapy","authors":"K. Murphy ,&nbsp;T. O'Donovan ,&nbsp;A. Devine ,&nbsp;A. Barry ,&nbsp;A. England ,&nbsp;M. McEntee","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2025.103171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Radiation Therapists (RTTs) are responsible for the delivery of radiation therapy (RT). More than half of all people with cancer receive RT as part of their treatment. This study investigates whether an educational intervention may alter adolescents’ understanding of RT as a treatment and the role of the RTT.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This quasi-experimental study was conducted in two Irish all-female secondary schools. Pre- and post-intervention questionnaires were designed and distributed to 5th year (n = 58) and 6th year students (n = 32) to explore the association between viewing two educational videos and changes in their understanding of radiation therapy. Students were aged between 16 and 18 years old. The first video focused on RT as treatment, and the second on the educational pathway to becoming an RTT. Due to the age of the participants, consent was obtained from both the student and their parent or guardian.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most participants (93 %, n = 84) improved their understanding of RT as a treatment and awareness of the role of the RTT. Participants’ initial understanding of the difference between diagnostic radiography and RT was low, with 18 (20.2 %) students stating that they knew the difference. This increased to 79 students (88 %) at the post-intervention stage. Pre-intervention, five (5.6 %) participants stated they had considered RT as a career; post-intervention, the number increased to 31 students (29.6 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The intervention successfully increased this sample's awareness and knowledge of RT as a treatment and potential career pathway.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><div>Educational interventions show promise in this setting. This example provides a basis for future research to explore the optimal educational intervention content and whether there is an impact on RTT recruitment and attrition rates within education programs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":"31 6","pages":"Article 103171"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817425003153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Radiation Therapists (RTTs) are responsible for the delivery of radiation therapy (RT). More than half of all people with cancer receive RT as part of their treatment. This study investigates whether an educational intervention may alter adolescents’ understanding of RT as a treatment and the role of the RTT.

Methods

This quasi-experimental study was conducted in two Irish all-female secondary schools. Pre- and post-intervention questionnaires were designed and distributed to 5th year (n = 58) and 6th year students (n = 32) to explore the association between viewing two educational videos and changes in their understanding of radiation therapy. Students were aged between 16 and 18 years old. The first video focused on RT as treatment, and the second on the educational pathway to becoming an RTT. Due to the age of the participants, consent was obtained from both the student and their parent or guardian.

Results

Most participants (93 %, n = 84) improved their understanding of RT as a treatment and awareness of the role of the RTT. Participants’ initial understanding of the difference between diagnostic radiography and RT was low, with 18 (20.2 %) students stating that they knew the difference. This increased to 79 students (88 %) at the post-intervention stage. Pre-intervention, five (5.6 %) participants stated they had considered RT as a career; post-intervention, the number increased to 31 students (29.6 %).

Conclusion

The intervention successfully increased this sample's awareness and knowledge of RT as a treatment and potential career pathway.

Implications for practice

Educational interventions show promise in this setting. This example provides a basis for future research to explore the optimal educational intervention content and whether there is an impact on RTT recruitment and attrition rates within education programs.
教育干预对青少年了解放射治疗的效果
放射治疗师(rtt)负责提供放射治疗(RT)。超过一半的癌症患者将放疗作为治疗的一部分。本研究探讨了教育干预是否会改变青少年对RTT作为一种治疗方法的理解以及RTT的作用。方法准实验研究在爱尔兰两所女子中学进行。我们设计了干预前和干预后的问卷,并分发给五年级(n = 58)和六年级(n = 32)的学生,以探讨观看两个教育视频与他们对放射治疗的理解变化之间的关系。学生年龄在16到18岁之间。第一个视频关注的是作为治疗的RTT,第二个视频关注的是成为RTT的教育途径。由于参与者的年龄,必须征得学生及其父母或监护人的同意。结果大多数参与者(93%,n = 84)提高了他们对RTT作为一种治疗方法的理解和对RTT作用的认识。参与者对诊断放射摄影和RT之间的区别的初步理解很低,只有18名(20.2%)学生表示他们知道区别。在干预后阶段,这一数字增加到79名学生(88%)。干预前,5名(5.6%)参与者表示他们曾将RT视为职业;干预后,这一数字增加到31人(29.6%)。结论干预成功地提高了该样本对RT作为一种治疗方法和潜在职业途径的认识和知识。对实践的启示在这种情况下,教育干预显示出希望。本研究为未来探讨最佳教育干预内容以及是否影响RTT在教育项目中的招募率和流失率提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiography
Radiography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信