Revealing the lateral interference of lateral organization of automated truck platoon on surrounding manual vehicles

IF 6.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS
Qi Li, Feng Chen
{"title":"Revealing the lateral interference of lateral organization of automated truck platoon on surrounding manual vehicles","authors":"Qi Li,&nbsp;Feng Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2025.108244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Automated truck platoon (ATP) represents a promising near-term automated mobility solution that can advance road sustainability by reducing pavement wear when configured with lateral offsets. As ATPs will initially share the roadway with human-driven vehicles (HDVs) before a full shift to autonomous transport, understanding how ATP lateral organization affects adjacent-lane HDVs is critical to preventing unintended safety risks. To address this gap, we first conducted driving simulation experiments with 38 nonprofessional commuters to quantify the effects of lateral-offset ATPs on driver behavior. We then compared the critical lateral distances between driving simulation data and naturalistic driving data using nonparametric probability model, and used Monte Carlo simulation on naturalistic driving data to model ATP‐induced interference under varying distribution scenarios. Our results show that lateral‐offset ATPs induce significantly greater lateral deviations and speed reduction for HDV, especially on curves. Specifically, ATP elevates driver fear perception score by 22.77 %, increases lateral deviation of HDV by 38.46 %, and raises interference probability by 25 %. Moreover, drivers’ responses to ATPs do not fully align with risk-homeostasis theory. Based on these insights, we recommend limiting ATP lateral dispersion, particularly avoiding right-biased formations, and prohibiting such configurations on curved segments. By clarifying how lateral organization of ATP shapes mixed-traffic dynamics, this study informs the safe integration of platooning technologies into existing road networks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":6926,"journal":{"name":"Accident; analysis and prevention","volume":"222 ","pages":"Article 108244"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident; analysis and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000145752500332X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Automated truck platoon (ATP) represents a promising near-term automated mobility solution that can advance road sustainability by reducing pavement wear when configured with lateral offsets. As ATPs will initially share the roadway with human-driven vehicles (HDVs) before a full shift to autonomous transport, understanding how ATP lateral organization affects adjacent-lane HDVs is critical to preventing unintended safety risks. To address this gap, we first conducted driving simulation experiments with 38 nonprofessional commuters to quantify the effects of lateral-offset ATPs on driver behavior. We then compared the critical lateral distances between driving simulation data and naturalistic driving data using nonparametric probability model, and used Monte Carlo simulation on naturalistic driving data to model ATP‐induced interference under varying distribution scenarios. Our results show that lateral‐offset ATPs induce significantly greater lateral deviations and speed reduction for HDV, especially on curves. Specifically, ATP elevates driver fear perception score by 22.77 %, increases lateral deviation of HDV by 38.46 %, and raises interference probability by 25 %. Moreover, drivers’ responses to ATPs do not fully align with risk-homeostasis theory. Based on these insights, we recommend limiting ATP lateral dispersion, particularly avoiding right-biased formations, and prohibiting such configurations on curved segments. By clarifying how lateral organization of ATP shapes mixed-traffic dynamics, this study informs the safe integration of platooning technologies into existing road networks.
揭示了自动卡车排横向组织对周围手动车辆的横向干扰
自动卡车排(ATP)代表了一种很有前途的近期自动化移动解决方案,通过配置横向偏移,可以减少路面磨损,从而提高道路的可持续性。在完全转向自动驾驶之前,ATP将首先与人类驾驶车辆(HDVs)共享道路,因此了解ATP横向组织如何影响相邻车道的HDVs对于防止意外安全风险至关重要。为了解决这一差距,我们首先对38名非专业通勤者进行了驾驶模拟实验,以量化横向偏移atp对驾驶员行为的影响。然后,我们利用非参数概率模型比较了驾驶模拟数据和自然驾驶数据之间的临界横向距离,并利用蒙特卡罗模拟自然驾驶数据来模拟不同分布情景下ATP诱导的干扰。我们的研究结果表明,横向偏移atp会导致HDV的横向偏差和速度降低,特别是在弯道上。其中,ATP使驾驶员恐惧感知得分提高22.77%,使HDV横向偏差提高38.46%,使干扰概率提高25%。此外,驾驶员对atp的反应并不完全符合风险稳态理论。基于这些见解,我们建议限制ATP横向分散,特别是避免右偏的地层,并禁止在弯曲段上进行这种配置。通过阐明横向组织ATP如何形成混合交通动态,本研究为将队列技术安全集成到现有道路网络中提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
16.90%
发文量
264
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Accident Analysis & Prevention provides wide coverage of the general areas relating to accidental injury and damage, including the pre-injury and immediate post-injury phases. Published papers deal with medical, legal, economic, educational, behavioral, theoretical or empirical aspects of transportation accidents, as well as with accidents at other sites. Selected topics within the scope of the Journal may include: studies of human, environmental and vehicular factors influencing the occurrence, type and severity of accidents and injury; the design, implementation and evaluation of countermeasures; biomechanics of impact and human tolerance limits to injury; modelling and statistical analysis of accident data; policy, planning and decision-making in safety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信