Quantitative assessment of automated threshold selection methods for Generalized Pareto Distribution for modeling precipitation extremes in the Indian subcontinent
{"title":"Quantitative assessment of automated threshold selection methods for Generalized Pareto Distribution for modeling precipitation extremes in the Indian subcontinent","authors":"G. Sree Anusha , R. Maheswaran","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.134166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Extreme Value Theory (EVT) provides a reliable statistical framework for modeling and understanding the behavior of extreme events. Within EVT, the Peak-Over-Threshold (POT) model is a powerful method for estimating the Extreme Precipitation Events (EPEs); however, its application is limited largely due to the challenges in selecting optimal threshold values. The present study critically examines and compares the theoretical underpinnings of several threshold selection methods (such as Anderson Darling (AD), Normality of Differences (ND), Squared Error(SE) and Multiple Threshold Method (MTM)) within the context of the Generalized Pareto Distribution (GPD) model. The comparison of these methods was performed on i) synthetic datasets generated through Monte Carlo simulation and ii) daily and seasonal gridded precipitation datasets from the Indian subcontinent. The evaluation revealed certain theoretical limitations of the existing methods, leading to the development of hybrid threshold selection methods. Results from the synthetic samples also show that the hybrid methods are more accurate and effective in determining critical threshold ranges. Application of the method to Indian precipitation datasets yielded comparable results, with threshold values effectively capturing the spatial pattern of extremes, consistent with regional characteristics. For example, thresholds identified for coastal and northeastern regions often exceed 160 mm/day, while the Rajasthan region exhibits significantly lower thresholds, frequently less than 15 mm/day. These estimated threshold values were subsequently employed to investigate the temporal variability of extreme events within the Indian region. The results indicated a considerable increase in the number of peaks and peak intensity of precipitation events in certain parts of the Southern Peninsular region of India. This study is crucial for providing comprehensive guidelines and improving the reliability of POT-based threshold selection methods for identifying EPEs. The approach is essential for assessing the increasing intensity and frequency of precipitation extremes related to climate change, offering valuable insights for targeted mitigation and disaster risk reduction strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"663 ","pages":"Article 134166"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425015045","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Extreme Value Theory (EVT) provides a reliable statistical framework for modeling and understanding the behavior of extreme events. Within EVT, the Peak-Over-Threshold (POT) model is a powerful method for estimating the Extreme Precipitation Events (EPEs); however, its application is limited largely due to the challenges in selecting optimal threshold values. The present study critically examines and compares the theoretical underpinnings of several threshold selection methods (such as Anderson Darling (AD), Normality of Differences (ND), Squared Error(SE) and Multiple Threshold Method (MTM)) within the context of the Generalized Pareto Distribution (GPD) model. The comparison of these methods was performed on i) synthetic datasets generated through Monte Carlo simulation and ii) daily and seasonal gridded precipitation datasets from the Indian subcontinent. The evaluation revealed certain theoretical limitations of the existing methods, leading to the development of hybrid threshold selection methods. Results from the synthetic samples also show that the hybrid methods are more accurate and effective in determining critical threshold ranges. Application of the method to Indian precipitation datasets yielded comparable results, with threshold values effectively capturing the spatial pattern of extremes, consistent with regional characteristics. For example, thresholds identified for coastal and northeastern regions often exceed 160 mm/day, while the Rajasthan region exhibits significantly lower thresholds, frequently less than 15 mm/day. These estimated threshold values were subsequently employed to investigate the temporal variability of extreme events within the Indian region. The results indicated a considerable increase in the number of peaks and peak intensity of precipitation events in certain parts of the Southern Peninsular region of India. This study is crucial for providing comprehensive guidelines and improving the reliability of POT-based threshold selection methods for identifying EPEs. The approach is essential for assessing the increasing intensity and frequency of precipitation extremes related to climate change, offering valuable insights for targeted mitigation and disaster risk reduction strategies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.