Yexing Yin , Wenzhu Xu , Gang Yu , Sheng Jin , Wenbin Yao
{"title":"Examining public pre-acceptance of license plate restriction policy cancellation using structural equation modeling: Evidence from Hangzhou","authors":"Yexing Yin , Wenzhu Xu , Gang Yu , Sheng Jin , Wenbin Yao","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To better understand the factors influencing the pre-acceptance of canceling the License Plate Restriction (LPR) policy among Hangzhou residents, a questionnaire survey was conducted with 958 residents, and two analytical methods were applied. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was used to examine the complex relationships between psychological factors. Meanwhile, ordinal logistic regression was employed to analyze the influence of socio-economic attributes, such as gender, family life cycle, commuting time, and vehicle ownership, on policy pre-acceptance. The results indicate that the acceptance of alternative measures, perceived infringement, social norms, post-acceptance of the LPR policy, perceived effectiveness, perceived cost-benefit, and fairness significantly influence the public's pre-acceptance of canceling the LPR policy. Through the analysis of socio-economic attributes, it was found that families with children, groups with higher travel demands, and those with fewer vehicles are more likely to support canceling the LPR policy. Among these, males show a greater willingness to cancel the LPR policy compared to females. This study provides valuable insights for policymakers, offering evidence-based recommendations for optimizing Traffic Demand Management (TDM) strategies, particularly as the effectiveness of the LPR policy declines over time. The findings are significant as they contribute to the understanding of public attitudes toward policy change and can inform future traffic management reforms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 103817"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25003609","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To better understand the factors influencing the pre-acceptance of canceling the License Plate Restriction (LPR) policy among Hangzhou residents, a questionnaire survey was conducted with 958 residents, and two analytical methods were applied. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was used to examine the complex relationships between psychological factors. Meanwhile, ordinal logistic regression was employed to analyze the influence of socio-economic attributes, such as gender, family life cycle, commuting time, and vehicle ownership, on policy pre-acceptance. The results indicate that the acceptance of alternative measures, perceived infringement, social norms, post-acceptance of the LPR policy, perceived effectiveness, perceived cost-benefit, and fairness significantly influence the public's pre-acceptance of canceling the LPR policy. Through the analysis of socio-economic attributes, it was found that families with children, groups with higher travel demands, and those with fewer vehicles are more likely to support canceling the LPR policy. Among these, males show a greater willingness to cancel the LPR policy compared to females. This study provides valuable insights for policymakers, offering evidence-based recommendations for optimizing Traffic Demand Management (TDM) strategies, particularly as the effectiveness of the LPR policy declines over time. The findings are significant as they contribute to the understanding of public attitudes toward policy change and can inform future traffic management reforms.
期刊介绍:
Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.