The spillover effects of auditor sanctions on clients: evidence from stock exchange comment letters in China

IF 2.9 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Xiao Gu , Yeng Wai Lau , Saidatunur Fauzi bin Saidin
{"title":"The spillover effects of auditor sanctions on clients: evidence from stock exchange comment letters in China","authors":"Xiao Gu ,&nbsp;Yeng Wai Lau ,&nbsp;Saidatunur Fauzi bin Saidin","doi":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the spillover effects of auditor sanctions on client firms. Using the DID model, results of listed Chinese A-share firms for the 2015–2022 period provide evidence of an adverse spillover effects of auditor sanctions where client firms have a higher probability of receiving exchange comment letters that are more severe, indicating that corporate regulators value the reputational damage of auditor sanctions. The spillover effects are more pronounced when auditor sanctions are more severe, news reports of sanction events are higher, or the audit firm is smaller. Additional analyses suggest that such adverse spillover effects are reflected in increased clients’ negative media attention and lower assessment of the quality of client firms’ accounting information. However, client firms’ online information disclosures on regulated, exchange interactive platforms can mitigate such adverse spillover effects. This study expands the boundaries of extant literature on the consequences of auditor sanctions in an emerging market and sheds light on how client firms can cope with the resultant reputation loss.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics","volume":"21 3","pages":"Article 100505"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1815566925000529","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the spillover effects of auditor sanctions on client firms. Using the DID model, results of listed Chinese A-share firms for the 2015–2022 period provide evidence of an adverse spillover effects of auditor sanctions where client firms have a higher probability of receiving exchange comment letters that are more severe, indicating that corporate regulators value the reputational damage of auditor sanctions. The spillover effects are more pronounced when auditor sanctions are more severe, news reports of sanction events are higher, or the audit firm is smaller. Additional analyses suggest that such adverse spillover effects are reflected in increased clients’ negative media attention and lower assessment of the quality of client firms’ accounting information. However, client firms’ online information disclosures on regulated, exchange interactive platforms can mitigate such adverse spillover effects. This study expands the boundaries of extant literature on the consequences of auditor sanctions in an emerging market and sheds light on how client firms can cope with the resultant reputation loss.
审计师制裁对客户的溢出效应:来自中国证券交易所意见书的证据
本研究探讨了审计制裁对客户公司的溢出效应。利用DID模型,2015-2022年期间中国a股上市公司的结果证明了审计师制裁的不利溢出效应,客户公司收到更严厉的交易所评论信的可能性更高,这表明公司监管机构重视审计师制裁的声誉损害。当审计人员受到的制裁越严重,对制裁事件的新闻报道越多,或者审计公司规模越小时,溢出效应就越明显。其他分析表明,这种不利的溢出效应反映在客户的负面媒体关注增加和对客户公司会计信息质量的评估降低上。然而,客户公司在受监管的交易所互动平台上的在线信息披露可以缓解这种不利的溢出效应。本研究扩展了现有文献对新兴市场审计师制裁后果的研究范围,并阐明了客户公司如何应对由此造成的声誉损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信