Measuring the effects of Obergefell v. Hodges: Revisiting same‐sex marriage legalization and mortgage demand

IF 2.4 3区 管理学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Nir Eilam, Hasan Shahid
{"title":"Measuring the effects of Obergefell v. Hodges: Revisiting same‐sex marriage legalization and mortgage demand","authors":"Nir Eilam, Hasan Shahid","doi":"10.1002/pam.70058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The U.S. Supreme Court's 2015 ruling in <jats:italic>Obergefell v. Hodges</jats:italic> made same‐sex marriage legal in all states. We estimate the effect of this landmark ruling on the mortgage demand of same‐sex couples. Using data on the near universe of mortgage applications, we employ a difference‐in‐differences estimation strategy that compares the mortgage demand from same‐sex and different‐sex couples, before and after the ruling. We find that the ruling increased the mortgage demand from same‐sex couples relative to different‐sex couples by 12% in states where same‐sex marriage was previously unavailable. Interestingly, we also estimate a 15% increase in the mortgage demand of same‐sex couples in states that had already legalized same‐sex marriage prior to the ruling. This suggests that the federal Supreme Court ruling brought greater certainty to same‐sex couples, even in states where same‐sex marriage was already legal. Additionally, we find that the effects were significantly larger for same‐sex female couples compared to same‐sex male couples, consistent with prior literature documenting higher marriage take‐up among women in same‐sex relationships. Our results emphasize the importance of federal Supreme Court rulings over and above similar state‐level legislation in shaping outcomes of vulnerable populations.","PeriodicalId":48105,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy Analysis and Management","volume":"195 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Policy Analysis and Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.70058","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court's 2015 ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges made same‐sex marriage legal in all states. We estimate the effect of this landmark ruling on the mortgage demand of same‐sex couples. Using data on the near universe of mortgage applications, we employ a difference‐in‐differences estimation strategy that compares the mortgage demand from same‐sex and different‐sex couples, before and after the ruling. We find that the ruling increased the mortgage demand from same‐sex couples relative to different‐sex couples by 12% in states where same‐sex marriage was previously unavailable. Interestingly, we also estimate a 15% increase in the mortgage demand of same‐sex couples in states that had already legalized same‐sex marriage prior to the ruling. This suggests that the federal Supreme Court ruling brought greater certainty to same‐sex couples, even in states where same‐sex marriage was already legal. Additionally, we find that the effects were significantly larger for same‐sex female couples compared to same‐sex male couples, consistent with prior literature documenting higher marriage take‐up among women in same‐sex relationships. Our results emphasize the importance of federal Supreme Court rulings over and above similar state‐level legislation in shaping outcomes of vulnerable populations.
衡量奥贝格费尔诉霍奇斯案的影响:重新审视同性婚姻合法化和抵押贷款需求
美国最高法院2015年对奥贝格费尔诉霍奇斯案的裁决使同性婚姻在所有州合法。我们估计了这一具有里程碑意义的裁决对同性伴侣抵押贷款需求的影响。利用抵押贷款申请的数据,我们采用了一种差中差估计策略,比较了判决前后同性伴侣和异性伴侣的抵押贷款需求。我们发现,在以前同性婚姻不存在的州,这项裁决使同性伴侣相对于异性伴侣的抵押贷款需求增加了12%。有趣的是,我们还估计,在裁决之前已经将同性婚姻合法化的州,同性伴侣的抵押贷款需求增加了15%。这表明,联邦最高法院的裁决给同性伴侣带来了更大的确定性,即使在同性婚姻已经合法的州也是如此。此外,我们发现,与同性男性伴侣相比,同性女性伴侣的影响要大得多,这与先前记录同性关系中女性婚姻占用率更高的文献一致。我们的研究结果强调了联邦最高法院的裁决比类似的州一级立法在塑造弱势群体结果方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: This journal encompasses issues and practices in policy analysis and public management. Listed among the contributors are economists, public managers, and operations researchers. Featured regularly are book reviews and a department devoted to discussing ideas and issues of importance to practitioners, researchers, and academics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信