Estimating the Prevalence and Severity of Isolated Small-Angle Strabismic Amblyopia.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2025-09-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S546692
Robert W Arnold
{"title":"Estimating the Prevalence and Severity of Isolated Small-Angle Strabismic Amblyopia.","authors":"Robert W Arnold","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S546692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Isolated small-angle (< 20PD) strabismic amblyopia (is-asa) is not obvious to parents and pediatricians and can be missed by current photoscreeners. To improve early screening methods, the previously unknown prevalence and severity of is-asa is estimated from a twenty-year prospective observation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Published population data from the Multi-Ethnic and Baltimore Pediatric Eye Disease Studies (MEPEDS and BPEDS) were combined to estimate the cumulative prevalence. Then prospective, consecutive digital images of Brückner Test from 2003 to 2025 by one pediatric ophthalmologist were obtained with confirmatory exams. These were then compared to Alaska population and vision screening data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From MEPEDS and BPEDS community screening data, patients with all strabismus, constant strabismus and strabismic amblyopia were stratified by strabismus angle suggesting that isolated small-angle strabismus (is-as) may occur in 1/200 children while is-asa may be 1/400 children. Over 22 years, 34 Alaska Brückner patients had isolated, constant strabismus less than 20 prism diopters of which 9 presented with amblyopia of which 4 had post-treatment residual amblyopia worse than 20/40. Considering population, doctors and referral rates, the Alaska prevalence of is-as is about 1 in 700 (0.03-0.24%) children while is-asa is about 1 in 7000 (0.006-0.024%) children.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>From two imperfect sources; review of large community screening studies and from prospective Brückner Test analysis, the prevalence of isolated small-angle strabismic amblyopia is so rare that future screening methods would require very high specificity. The Rebion blinq and 2WIN CR-function can identify is-asa in older children. Current photorefraction methods with early specific instrument referral criteria followed by sensitive acuity screening are still effective since is-asa is so rare.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"19 ","pages":"3409-3418"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12450028/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S546692","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Isolated small-angle (< 20PD) strabismic amblyopia (is-asa) is not obvious to parents and pediatricians and can be missed by current photoscreeners. To improve early screening methods, the previously unknown prevalence and severity of is-asa is estimated from a twenty-year prospective observation.

Methods: Published population data from the Multi-Ethnic and Baltimore Pediatric Eye Disease Studies (MEPEDS and BPEDS) were combined to estimate the cumulative prevalence. Then prospective, consecutive digital images of Brückner Test from 2003 to 2025 by one pediatric ophthalmologist were obtained with confirmatory exams. These were then compared to Alaska population and vision screening data.

Results: From MEPEDS and BPEDS community screening data, patients with all strabismus, constant strabismus and strabismic amblyopia were stratified by strabismus angle suggesting that isolated small-angle strabismus (is-as) may occur in 1/200 children while is-asa may be 1/400 children. Over 22 years, 34 Alaska Brückner patients had isolated, constant strabismus less than 20 prism diopters of which 9 presented with amblyopia of which 4 had post-treatment residual amblyopia worse than 20/40. Considering population, doctors and referral rates, the Alaska prevalence of is-as is about 1 in 700 (0.03-0.24%) children while is-asa is about 1 in 7000 (0.006-0.024%) children.

Conclusion: From two imperfect sources; review of large community screening studies and from prospective Brückner Test analysis, the prevalence of isolated small-angle strabismic amblyopia is so rare that future screening methods would require very high specificity. The Rebion blinq and 2WIN CR-function can identify is-asa in older children. Current photorefraction methods with early specific instrument referral criteria followed by sensitive acuity screening are still effective since is-asa is so rare.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

孤立性小角度斜视性弱视的患病率和严重程度评估。
背景:孤立性小角度(< 20PD)斜视性弱视(is-asa)对家长和儿科医生来说并不明显,目前的摄影筛查可能会遗漏。为了改进早期筛查方法,从20年的前瞻性观察中估计了以前未知的is-asa的患病率和严重程度。方法:结合多民族和巴尔的摩儿童眼病研究(MEPEDS和BPEDS)发表的人群数据来估计累积患病率。然后通过验证性检查获得一名儿童眼科医生2003年至2025年br ckner试验的前瞻性连续数字图像。然后将这些数据与阿拉斯加人口和视力筛查数据进行比较。结果:从MEPEDS和BPEDS社区筛查数据中,所有斜视、持续性斜视和斜视性弱视患者按斜视角度分层,提示孤立性小角度斜视(is-as)发生率为1/200,而is-asa发生率为1/400。22年间,34例阿拉斯加州br ckner患者出现孤立性、持续性斜视,屈光度小于20棱镜,其中9例出现弱视,其中4例术后残余弱视小于20/40。考虑到人口、医生和转诊率,阿拉斯加的is-as患病率约为700分之一(0.03-0.24%),而is-asa患病率约为7000分之一(0.006-0.024%)。结论:来自两个不完善的来源;回顾大型社区筛查研究和前瞻性br ckner试验分析,孤立性小角度斜视弱视的患病率非常罕见,因此未来的筛查方法需要非常高的特异性。Rebion blinq和2WIN cr功能可以识别年龄较大的儿童的is-asa。目前的光折射方法与早期特定的仪器推荐标准,然后敏感的视力筛查仍然有效,因为is-asa是如此罕见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信