Comparative Outcomes of Robotic Laser Arcuate Keratotomy and Toric Intraocular Lenses for the Management of Lower Magnitude Astigmatism at the Time of Cataract Surgery.
{"title":"Comparative Outcomes of Robotic Laser Arcuate Keratotomy and Toric Intraocular Lenses for the Management of Lower Magnitude Astigmatism at the Time of Cataract Surgery.","authors":"Gary Wortz, Preeya K Gupta, Jacob R Weinstock","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S543462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare refractive and visual outcomes between robotic laser-assisted arcuate keratotomy (AK) guided by the Wörtz-Gupta Formula<sup>TM</sup> and low-power toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation using the Barrett Toric Calculator for the management of low-magnitude regular corneal astigmatism during cataract surgery.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective, single-surgeon case series included 105 eyes with robotic laser-assisted AK using the ALLY platform with iris registration (LENSAR, Inc, Orlando, FL), and 53 received a toric IOL, using ALLY's IntelliAxis refractive capsulorhexis for intraoperative toric IOL alignment. The primary outcome measure was postoperative residual refractive cylinder at postoperative week 4. Secondary outcomes included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), best-corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and spherical equivalent (SE) refraction. Subgroup analyses evaluated outcomes by astigmatism orientation (with-the-rule [WTR] versus against-the-rule [ATR]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative residual refractive cylinder did not differ significantly between groups (-0.14 ± 0.16 D AK vs -0.21 ± 0.28 D toric, <i>p</i> = 0.103), nor did SE refraction (-0.08 ± 0.32 D AK versus -0.11 ± 0.28 D toric, <i>p</i> = 0.361), UDVA (0.05 ± 0.08 logMAR both groups, <i>p</i> = 0.507), or CDVA (-0.006 logMAR AK versus -0.004 logMAR toric, <i>p</i> = 0.623). More than 90% of eyes in both cohorts achieved ≤0.50 D of residual astigmatism, and ≥87% attained UDVA of 20/25 or better. Subgroup analyses by astigmatism orientation showed no statistically significant differences in residual cylinder, SE, or VA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In eyes with low-magnitude regular corneal astigmatism undergoing cataract surgery, robotic laser-assisted AK guided by the Wörtz-Gupta Formula<sup>TM</sup> achieved non-infereior refractive and visual outcomes to those of low-power toric IOL implantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"19 ","pages":"3401-3408"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12447956/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S543462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To compare refractive and visual outcomes between robotic laser-assisted arcuate keratotomy (AK) guided by the Wörtz-Gupta FormulaTM and low-power toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation using the Barrett Toric Calculator for the management of low-magnitude regular corneal astigmatism during cataract surgery.
Patients and methods: This retrospective, single-surgeon case series included 105 eyes with robotic laser-assisted AK using the ALLY platform with iris registration (LENSAR, Inc, Orlando, FL), and 53 received a toric IOL, using ALLY's IntelliAxis refractive capsulorhexis for intraoperative toric IOL alignment. The primary outcome measure was postoperative residual refractive cylinder at postoperative week 4. Secondary outcomes included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), best-corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and spherical equivalent (SE) refraction. Subgroup analyses evaluated outcomes by astigmatism orientation (with-the-rule [WTR] versus against-the-rule [ATR]).
Results: Postoperative residual refractive cylinder did not differ significantly between groups (-0.14 ± 0.16 D AK vs -0.21 ± 0.28 D toric, p = 0.103), nor did SE refraction (-0.08 ± 0.32 D AK versus -0.11 ± 0.28 D toric, p = 0.361), UDVA (0.05 ± 0.08 logMAR both groups, p = 0.507), or CDVA (-0.006 logMAR AK versus -0.004 logMAR toric, p = 0.623). More than 90% of eyes in both cohorts achieved ≤0.50 D of residual astigmatism, and ≥87% attained UDVA of 20/25 or better. Subgroup analyses by astigmatism orientation showed no statistically significant differences in residual cylinder, SE, or VA.
Conclusion: In eyes with low-magnitude regular corneal astigmatism undergoing cataract surgery, robotic laser-assisted AK guided by the Wörtz-Gupta FormulaTM achieved non-infereior refractive and visual outcomes to those of low-power toric IOL implantation.
目的:比较Wörtz-Gupta formula atm指导下的机器人激光辅助弓形角膜切开术(AK)与Barrett toric计算器辅助下的低度数环型人工晶状体(IOL)植入术治疗白内障手术中低度数常规角膜散光的屈光和视力结果。患者和方法:本回顾性单手术病例系列包括105只眼,使用ALLY平台和虹膜配准(LENSAR, Inc, Orlando, FL)进行机器人激光辅助AK, 53只眼接受环状体人工晶状体,使用ALLY的IntelliAxis屈光性囊解术进行术中环状体人工晶状体对准。主要观察指标为术后第4周的残余屈光柱。次要结果包括未矫正距离视力(UDVA)、最佳矫正距离视力(CDVA)和球面等效屈光度(SE)。亚组分析通过散光取向评估结果(符合规则[WTR]与不符合规则[ATR])。结果:术后残余屈光柱在两组间无显著差异(-0.14±0.16 D AK vs -0.21±0.28 D toric, p = 0.103), SE屈光(-0.08±0.32 D AK vs -0.11±0.28 D toric, p = 0.361), UDVA(两组均为0.05±0.08 logMAR, p = 0.507), CDVA (-0.006 logMAR AK vs -0.004 logMAR toric, p = 0.623)。在两个队列中,超过90%的眼睛达到≤0.50 D的剩余散光,≥87%的眼睛达到20/25或更好的UDVA。根据散光方向进行亚组分析,残余柱体、SE和va的差异均无统计学意义。结论:对于接受白内障手术的低光度常规角膜散光患者,在Wörtz-Gupta公式atm指导下,机器人激光辅助AK比低光度环形人工晶体植入术获得了非下屈光和视力结果。