Non-Contrast CT Hemorrhage Markers and Outcomes in Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Large Single-Center Cohort from Romania.

IF 0.8 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Cosmin Cindea, Vicentiu Saceleanu, Patrick Canning, Corina Roman-Filip, Romeo Mihaila
{"title":"Non-Contrast CT Hemorrhage Markers and Outcomes in Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Large Single-Center Cohort from Romania.","authors":"Cosmin Cindea, Vicentiu Saceleanu, Patrick Canning, Corina Roman-Filip, Romeo Mihaila","doi":"10.3390/reports8030159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Early hematoma expansion (HE) is a key driver of poor outcomes, yet readily available non-contrast CT (NCCT) markers remain underused. We assessed four predefined NCCT signs-Blend Sign (BS), Black Hole Sign (BHS), Irregular Shape (IRS), and Satellite Sign (SS)-and a simple composite score (SUM_BBIS, 0-4) for their association with HE and in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 404 consecutive adults with primary spontaneous ICH admitted to a tertiary-care center between January 2017 and December 2023. Patients with secondary causes of hemorrhage or without follow-up NCCT were excluded. Each sign was scored dichotomously by blinded readers and summed to form the SUM_BBIS. HE was defined as a >6 mL or >33% volume increase on repeat NCCT within 24-48 h. Outcomes included HE and in-hospital mortality; secondary analyses explored relationships with baseline hematoma volume, location, intraventricular extension (IVH), and comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 404 patients, Irregular Shape was most frequent (62.1%), followed by Satellite Sign (34.9%), Black Hole Sign (31.1%), and Blend Sign (15.3%). Hematoma expansion occurred in 22.0% (89/404). Expansion was more common when ≥1 sign was present, with the Black Hole Sign showing the strongest association (56.2% vs. 23.8%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). In-hospital mortality rose stepwise with higher SUM_BBIS (mean 1.95 in non-survivors vs. 0.93 in survivors; <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The four predefined NCCT signs, particularly BHS, identify ICH patients at increased risk of HE and in-hospital death. A simple, purely imaging-based composite (SUM_BBIS) captures cumulative radiological complexity and stratifies risk in a stepwise manner. Systematic evaluation of these markers may enhance early triage and inform timely therapeutic decisions, especially in emergency and resource-limited settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":74664,"journal":{"name":"Reports (MDPI)","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12452692/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reports (MDPI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/reports8030159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Early hematoma expansion (HE) is a key driver of poor outcomes, yet readily available non-contrast CT (NCCT) markers remain underused. We assessed four predefined NCCT signs-Blend Sign (BS), Black Hole Sign (BHS), Irregular Shape (IRS), and Satellite Sign (SS)-and a simple composite score (SUM_BBIS, 0-4) for their association with HE and in-hospital mortality.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 404 consecutive adults with primary spontaneous ICH admitted to a tertiary-care center between January 2017 and December 2023. Patients with secondary causes of hemorrhage or without follow-up NCCT were excluded. Each sign was scored dichotomously by blinded readers and summed to form the SUM_BBIS. HE was defined as a >6 mL or >33% volume increase on repeat NCCT within 24-48 h. Outcomes included HE and in-hospital mortality; secondary analyses explored relationships with baseline hematoma volume, location, intraventricular extension (IVH), and comorbidities.

Results: Among 404 patients, Irregular Shape was most frequent (62.1%), followed by Satellite Sign (34.9%), Black Hole Sign (31.1%), and Blend Sign (15.3%). Hematoma expansion occurred in 22.0% (89/404). Expansion was more common when ≥1 sign was present, with the Black Hole Sign showing the strongest association (56.2% vs. 23.8%; p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality rose stepwise with higher SUM_BBIS (mean 1.95 in non-survivors vs. 0.93 in survivors; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The four predefined NCCT signs, particularly BHS, identify ICH patients at increased risk of HE and in-hospital death. A simple, purely imaging-based composite (SUM_BBIS) captures cumulative radiological complexity and stratifies risk in a stepwise manner. Systematic evaluation of these markers may enhance early triage and inform timely therapeutic decisions, especially in emergency and resource-limited settings.

脑出血的非对比CT出血标记物和结果:来自罗马尼亚的大型单中心队列。
背景和目的:自发性脑出血(ICH)具有高发病率和高死亡率。早期血肿扩张(HE)是不良预后的关键驱动因素,但现成的非对比CT (NCCT)标志物仍未得到充分利用。我们评估了四种预定义的NCCT标志——混合标志(BS)、黑洞标志(BHS)、不规则形状标志(IRS)和卫星标志(SS),并对它们与HE和住院死亡率的关系进行了简单的综合评分(SUM_BBIS, 0-4)。方法:我们回顾性分析了2017年1月至2023年12月在一家三级护理中心连续收治的404例原发性自发性脑出血成人患者。排除继发性出血或未随访NCCT的患者。每个符号由盲读者进行二分评分,并求和形成SUM_BBIS。HE定义为24-48小时内重复NCCT后血容量增加bb6ml或>33%。结果包括HE和院内死亡率;二次分析探讨了与基线血肿体积、位置、脑室扩张(IVH)和合并症的关系。结果:404例患者中以不规则征(62.1%)居多,其次为卫星征(34.9%)、黑洞征(31.1%)、混合征(15.3%)。22.0%(89/404)发生血肿扩张。当≥1个标志存在时,膨胀更为常见,其中黑洞标志的相关性最强(56.2%比23.8%;p < 0.001)。住院死亡率随着SUM_BBIS的升高而逐步上升(非幸存者平均1.95,幸存者平均0.93,p < 0.001)。结论:四种预定义的NCCT体征,特别是BHS,可识别脑出血患者的HE和院内死亡风险增加。一个简单的、纯粹基于成像的合成(SUM_BBIS)捕获累积的放射复杂性,并以逐步的方式对风险进行分层。对这些标记物进行系统的评估可以加强早期分诊,并为及时的治疗决策提供信息,特别是在紧急情况和资源有限的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信