Exploring difference in recognition and confusion of facial expressions between high and low problematic internet use individuals: Evidence from behavior and ERPs
{"title":"Exploring difference in recognition and confusion of facial expressions between high and low problematic internet use individuals: Evidence from behavior and ERPs","authors":"Wenhan Zhang , Zhen Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2025.113253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate recognition of facial expressions is crucial for effective interpersonal socialization, but individuals with problematic internet use (PIU) may face challenges. This study compared facial expression recognition between high PIU (HPIU) and low PIU (LPIU) individuals across three experiments. Experiment 1, using six-alternative forced choice task, found that HPIU individuals recognized six basic emotions significantly less accurately than LPIU individuals and showed greater confusion, particularly for negative expressions. Experiment 2 focused on anger and disgust expressions using the emotional expression multimorph task. HPIU individuals made significantly more errors for both expressions. Experiment 3, using event-related potentials (ERPs), revealed HPIU individuals exhibited higher N170 amplitude to anger at early stages. Additionally, HPIU individuals demonstrated higher aggression, emotional social isolation, state-trait anxiety, and immature defense styles. Correlation analysis showed that after FDR correction, only aggression levels (and its subscales) correlated significantly with facial expression recognition task performance. These findings offer initial insights into PIU-related facial expression recognition differences and highlight aggression as a key psychosocial correlate. Observed trends in specific facial expression recognition area warrant further investigation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54945,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychophysiology","volume":"216 ","pages":"Article 113253"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167876025007494","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Accurate recognition of facial expressions is crucial for effective interpersonal socialization, but individuals with problematic internet use (PIU) may face challenges. This study compared facial expression recognition between high PIU (HPIU) and low PIU (LPIU) individuals across three experiments. Experiment 1, using six-alternative forced choice task, found that HPIU individuals recognized six basic emotions significantly less accurately than LPIU individuals and showed greater confusion, particularly for negative expressions. Experiment 2 focused on anger and disgust expressions using the emotional expression multimorph task. HPIU individuals made significantly more errors for both expressions. Experiment 3, using event-related potentials (ERPs), revealed HPIU individuals exhibited higher N170 amplitude to anger at early stages. Additionally, HPIU individuals demonstrated higher aggression, emotional social isolation, state-trait anxiety, and immature defense styles. Correlation analysis showed that after FDR correction, only aggression levels (and its subscales) correlated significantly with facial expression recognition task performance. These findings offer initial insights into PIU-related facial expression recognition differences and highlight aggression as a key psychosocial correlate. Observed trends in specific facial expression recognition area warrant further investigation.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Psychophysiology is the official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, and provides a respected forum for the publication of high quality original contributions on all aspects of psychophysiology. The journal is interdisciplinary and aims to integrate the neurosciences and behavioral sciences. Empirical, theoretical, and review articles are encouraged in the following areas:
• Cerebral psychophysiology: including functional brain mapping and neuroimaging with Event-Related Potentials (ERPs), Positron Emission Tomography (PET), Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and Electroencephalographic studies.
• Autonomic functions: including bilateral electrodermal activity, pupillometry and blood volume changes.
• Cardiovascular Psychophysiology:including studies of blood pressure, cardiac functioning and respiration.
• Somatic psychophysiology: including muscle activity, eye movements and eye blinks.