Burden and impact of pertussis in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation.

IF 0.8 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Archana Baburao, Vindhya Ponnathota, Aleena Mariam Mathew, Lakshminarayana Sura Anjanappa, Parinita Suresh, Thirthashree Kanabur
{"title":"Burden and impact of pertussis in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation.","authors":"Archana Baburao, Vindhya Ponnathota, Aleena Mariam Mathew, Lakshminarayana Sura Anjanappa, Parinita Suresh, Thirthashree Kanabur","doi":"10.4081/monaldi.2025.3421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pertussis is highly prevalent in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, but it is underrecognized and underreported in India. This study aims to assess the burden and impact of pertussis in patients with COPD acute exacerbations and also evaluates the correlation between pertussis and COPD exacerbation. This is a prospective, observational, cross-sectional study enrolling 250 COPD patients admitted with moderate to severe exacerbation. Relevant investigations and oropharyngeal swabs for pertussis were collected from the study subjects. Among 250 patients with COPD acute exacerbation, a throat swab was positive for Bordetella pertussis in 40 (16.1%) of subjects. Among positive subjects, 45% had moderate and 55% had severe exacerbation. Pertussis-positive subjects had statistically significantly higher COPD assessment test scores (p=0.02), more exacerbations in the past year (p=0.03), associated coronary artery disease (p=0.007), pulmonary hypertension (p=0.001), significantly lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second values (p=0.04), exercise-induced desaturation (p=0.02), and belonged to group E GOLD category (p=0.01), compared to negative subjects with no significant difference in mortality. 55% of pertussis-positive patients required intensive care unit (ICU) admission compared to negative subjects (p=0.04). Further, within swab-positive patients, physiological indicators like peripheral oxygen saturation and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide significantly predicted ICU need. This study demonstrates that COPD patients are potentially at increased risk of pertussis infection, and there is an association between pertussis infection and COPD severity. Vaccination coverage against pertussis among COPD patients is negligible. Large multicenter studies are required to establish the true burden of pertussis in COPD patients, including the healthcare costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51593,"journal":{"name":"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2025.3421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pertussis is highly prevalent in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, but it is underrecognized and underreported in India. This study aims to assess the burden and impact of pertussis in patients with COPD acute exacerbations and also evaluates the correlation between pertussis and COPD exacerbation. This is a prospective, observational, cross-sectional study enrolling 250 COPD patients admitted with moderate to severe exacerbation. Relevant investigations and oropharyngeal swabs for pertussis were collected from the study subjects. Among 250 patients with COPD acute exacerbation, a throat swab was positive for Bordetella pertussis in 40 (16.1%) of subjects. Among positive subjects, 45% had moderate and 55% had severe exacerbation. Pertussis-positive subjects had statistically significantly higher COPD assessment test scores (p=0.02), more exacerbations in the past year (p=0.03), associated coronary artery disease (p=0.007), pulmonary hypertension (p=0.001), significantly lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second values (p=0.04), exercise-induced desaturation (p=0.02), and belonged to group E GOLD category (p=0.01), compared to negative subjects with no significant difference in mortality. 55% of pertussis-positive patients required intensive care unit (ICU) admission compared to negative subjects (p=0.04). Further, within swab-positive patients, physiological indicators like peripheral oxygen saturation and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide significantly predicted ICU need. This study demonstrates that COPD patients are potentially at increased risk of pertussis infection, and there is an association between pertussis infection and COPD severity. Vaccination coverage against pertussis among COPD patients is negligible. Large multicenter studies are required to establish the true burden of pertussis in COPD patients, including the healthcare costs.

慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重患者百日咳的负担和影响。
百日咳在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中非常普遍,但在印度却未得到充分认识和报道。本研究旨在评估百日咳对COPD急性加重患者的负担和影响,并评估百日咳与COPD加重的相关性。这是一项前瞻性、观察性、横断面研究,纳入了250例中度至重度急性加重的COPD患者。收集了研究对象的百日咳相关调查和口咽拭子。在250例COPD急性加重患者中,40例(16.1%)受试者的咽拭子百日咳杆菌呈阳性。在阳性受试者中,45%有中度加重,55%有重度加重。与阴性组相比,百日咳阳性组COPD评估测试得分(p=0.02)、过去一年加重次数(p=0.03)、相关冠状动脉疾病(p=0.007)、肺动脉高压(p=0.001)、1秒用力呼气量(p=0.04)、运动引起的去饱和(p=0.02)明显降低,属于E GOLD组(p=0.01),死亡率无显著差异。与阴性受试者相比,55%的百日咳阳性患者需要入住重症监护病房(ICU) (p=0.04)。此外,在拭子阳性患者中,外周氧饱和度和肺一氧化碳弥散能力等生理指标可显著预测ICU需求。本研究表明,慢性阻塞性肺病患者百日咳感染的风险可能增加,并且百日咳感染与慢性阻塞性肺病严重程度之间存在关联。慢性阻塞性肺病患者的百日咳疫苗接种覆盖率可以忽略不计。需要大规模的多中心研究来确定慢性阻塞性肺病患者百日咳的真正负担,包括医疗费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信