Mutual information-based teamwork evaluation in real-world environments: an exploratory investigation with professional surgeons.

IF 3
Frontiers in network physiology Pub Date : 2025-09-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnetp.2025.1608824
Vincenzo Ronca, Lidia Castagneto Gissey, Maria Irene Bellini, Alessandra Iodice, Pietro Aricò, Gianluca Di Flumeri, Andrea Giorgi, Alessia Vozzi, Rossella Capotorto, Stefano Bonelli, Laura Moens, Fabio Babiloni, Giovanni Casella, Gianluca Borghini
{"title":"Mutual information-based teamwork evaluation in real-world environments: an exploratory investigation with professional surgeons.","authors":"Vincenzo Ronca, Lidia Castagneto Gissey, Maria Irene Bellini, Alessandra Iodice, Pietro Aricò, Gianluca Di Flumeri, Andrea Giorgi, Alessia Vozzi, Rossella Capotorto, Stefano Bonelli, Laura Moens, Fabio Babiloni, Giovanni Casella, Gianluca Borghini","doi":"10.3389/fnetp.2025.1608824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Teamwork involves intricate interactions among individuals or groups with shared goals. It necessitates effective communication, defined roles, decision-making processes, and the allocation of cognitive and emotional resources. Objective teamwork assessment demands a comprehensive set of metrics. Although subjective and behavioral metrics, such as self-evaluation and task completion time, are generally applied, they are prone to bias and a lack of objectivity, highlighting the inherent limitations of capturing the unconscious processes of human behavior.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To mitigate these limitations, the present study proposed a novel approach to teamwork evaluation based on neurophysiological signals (electroencephalograms, EEGs) compatible with real-world applications, i.e., surgical teams engaged in real-world surgeries. To the best of our knowledge, there is no scientific evidence of an objective teamwork measure performed among more than two members and relying on neurophysiological signals in real-world environments. Therefore, the present work aimed at i) developing and investigating the reliability of an objective EEG-based teamwork index using mutual information (MI) methods and ii) providing additional and objective insights for surgeons' supervisors in healthcare training.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The results demonstrated the capability of the EEG-based training index to provide additional and objective information, along with its added value and reliability compared to conventional measures (all R > 0.62, all <i>p</i> < 0.002). Furthermore, the EEG-based teamwork index allowed the determination (all <i>p</i> < 0.001) of surgeons' experience levels (expert vs novice) in terms of cooperative behavior.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results pave the way for targeted interventions, adaptive training sessions, and optimizations in team dynamics and open up opportunities for applying neurophysiological measurements for teamwork evaluation in all operational fields, where proper and granular teamwork optimization could play a crucial role in terms of safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":73092,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in network physiology","volume":"5 ","pages":"1608824"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12443683/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in network physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnetp.2025.1608824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Teamwork involves intricate interactions among individuals or groups with shared goals. It necessitates effective communication, defined roles, decision-making processes, and the allocation of cognitive and emotional resources. Objective teamwork assessment demands a comprehensive set of metrics. Although subjective and behavioral metrics, such as self-evaluation and task completion time, are generally applied, they are prone to bias and a lack of objectivity, highlighting the inherent limitations of capturing the unconscious processes of human behavior.

Methods: To mitigate these limitations, the present study proposed a novel approach to teamwork evaluation based on neurophysiological signals (electroencephalograms, EEGs) compatible with real-world applications, i.e., surgical teams engaged in real-world surgeries. To the best of our knowledge, there is no scientific evidence of an objective teamwork measure performed among more than two members and relying on neurophysiological signals in real-world environments. Therefore, the present work aimed at i) developing and investigating the reliability of an objective EEG-based teamwork index using mutual information (MI) methods and ii) providing additional and objective insights for surgeons' supervisors in healthcare training.

Findings: The results demonstrated the capability of the EEG-based training index to provide additional and objective information, along with its added value and reliability compared to conventional measures (all R > 0.62, all p < 0.002). Furthermore, the EEG-based teamwork index allowed the determination (all p < 0.001) of surgeons' experience levels (expert vs novice) in terms of cooperative behavior.

Conclusion: The results pave the way for targeted interventions, adaptive training sessions, and optimizations in team dynamics and open up opportunities for applying neurophysiological measurements for teamwork evaluation in all operational fields, where proper and granular teamwork optimization could play a crucial role in terms of safety.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

现实环境中基于相互信息的团队合作评估:专业外科医生的探索性调查。
目的:团队合作涉及具有共同目标的个人或群体之间复杂的互动。它需要有效的沟通、明确的角色、决策过程以及认知和情感资源的分配。客观的团队合作评估需要一套全面的度量标准。虽然主观和行为指标,如自我评价和任务完成时间,通常被应用,但它们容易产生偏见和缺乏客观性,突出了捕捉人类行为无意识过程的固有局限性。方法:为了减轻这些限制,本研究提出了一种新的团队合作评估方法,该方法基于与现实世界应用相兼容的神经生理信号(脑电图,EEGs),即从事现实世界手术的外科团队。据我们所知,没有科学证据表明,在现实环境中,有两名以上的成员依靠神经生理信号进行客观的团队合作测量。因此,目前的工作旨在i)开发和调查使用互信息(MI)方法的客观的基于脑电图的团队合作指数的可靠性,ii)为外科医生的主管在医疗保健培训中提供额外和客观的见解。结果表明,与传统测量方法相比,基于脑电图的训练指数能够提供额外和客观的信息,以及其附加价值和可靠性(所有R < 0.62,所有p < 0.002)。此外,基于脑电图的团队合作指数允许确定(所有p < 0.001)外科医生在合作行为方面的经验水平(专家与新手)。结论:研究结果为针对性干预、适应性训练和团队动态优化铺平了道路,并为将神经生理学测量应用于所有操作领域的团队合作评估开辟了机会,在这些领域中,适当和细致的团队合作优化可以在安全方面发挥关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信