Contribution of First Contact With a Cardiologist to the Door-to-Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Time in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock - Data From K-ACTIVE.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Toshinori Ko, Yusuke Hosokawa, Kuniya Asai, Atsuo Maeda, Yoshihiro Akashi, Junya Ako, Yuji Ikari, Toshiaki Ebina, Kouichi Tamura, Atsuo Namiki, Kiyoshi Hibi, Kazuki Fukui, Ichiro Michishita, Kazuo Kimura, Hiroshi Suzuki
{"title":"Contribution of First Contact With a Cardiologist to the Door-to-Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Time in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock - Data From K-ACTIVE.","authors":"Toshinori Ko, Yusuke Hosokawa, Kuniya Asai, Atsuo Maeda, Yoshihiro Akashi, Junya Ako, Yuji Ikari, Toshiaki Ebina, Kouichi Tamura, Atsuo Namiki, Kiyoshi Hibi, Kazuki Fukui, Ichiro Michishita, Kazuo Kimura, Hiroshi Suzuki","doi":"10.1253/circj.CJ-25-0130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current guidelines recommend early revascularization in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, guideline-recommended first medical contact-to-device times is reportedly achieved in only 40% of patients.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 369 patients with AMI complicated by CS from the Kanagawa-Acute Cardiovascular Registry to evaluate factors influencing delays in treatment and their effect on in-hospital mortality. Patients were stratified into 2 groups based on the median door-to-cardiac catheterization laboratory (D2C) time (≤39 or >39 min). In the group with D2C time ≤39 min, the first-contact physician was more frequently a cardiologist (71.9% vs. 47.0%; P<0.001) and significantly more patients had chest pain as the chief complaint (70.3% vs. 47.4%; P<0.001). Although pre- and post-percutaneous coronary intervention Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow was similar between the 2 groups, in-hospital mortality was significantly lower in the D2C time ≤39 min group (18.8% vs. 37.6%; P<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that D2C time >39 min was independently associated with a non-cardiologist being the first-contact physician, the absence of chest pain, a higher heart rate, and elevated creatinine levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>D2C time ≤39 min is correlated with reduced mortality in AMI patients with CS. Implementing systems to ensure cardiologists are the initial responders and optimizing in-hospital workflows could reduce the D2C time and improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50691,"journal":{"name":"Circulation Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-25-0130","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current guidelines recommend early revascularization in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, guideline-recommended first medical contact-to-device times is reportedly achieved in only 40% of patients.

Methods and results: We retrospectively analyzed 369 patients with AMI complicated by CS from the Kanagawa-Acute Cardiovascular Registry to evaluate factors influencing delays in treatment and their effect on in-hospital mortality. Patients were stratified into 2 groups based on the median door-to-cardiac catheterization laboratory (D2C) time (≤39 or >39 min). In the group with D2C time ≤39 min, the first-contact physician was more frequently a cardiologist (71.9% vs. 47.0%; P<0.001) and significantly more patients had chest pain as the chief complaint (70.3% vs. 47.4%; P<0.001). Although pre- and post-percutaneous coronary intervention Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow was similar between the 2 groups, in-hospital mortality was significantly lower in the D2C time ≤39 min group (18.8% vs. 37.6%; P<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that D2C time >39 min was independently associated with a non-cardiologist being the first-contact physician, the absence of chest pain, a higher heart rate, and elevated creatinine levels.

Conclusions: D2C time ≤39 min is correlated with reduced mortality in AMI patients with CS. Implementing systems to ensure cardiologists are the initial responders and optimizing in-hospital workflows could reduce the D2C time and improve outcomes.

首次接触心脏病专家对急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者从门到心导管实验室时间的贡献——来自K-ACTIVE的数据。
背景:目前的指南建议急性心肌梗死(AMI)后心源性休克(CS)患者早期进行血运重建。然而,据报道,只有40%的患者实现了指南建议的首次医疗接触时间。方法和结果:我们回顾性分析了来自神奈川县急性心血管登记处的369例AMI合并CS患者,以评估影响治疗延误的因素及其对住院死亡率的影响。根据门至心导管实验室(D2C)中位时间(≤39或>39 min)将患者分为2组。在D2C时间≤39 min的组中,第一次接触的医生更多地是心脏病专家(71.9% vs. 47.0%); P39 min与非心脏病专家为第一次接触的医生、无胸痛、心率较高和肌酐水平升高独立相关。结论:AMI合并CS患者D2C时间≤39 min与死亡率降低相关。实施系统以确保心脏病专家是最初的反应者,并优化医院内的工作流程,可以减少D2C时间并改善结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Circulation Journal
Circulation Journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
471
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Circulation publishes original research manuscripts, review articles, and other content related to cardiovascular health and disease, including observational studies, clinical trials, epidemiology, health services and outcomes studies, and advances in basic and translational research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信