Evaluation of the Candida score as a mortality predictor in hospitalized patients with Candida spp. colonization: A retrospective cohort study.

Q3 Medicine
Qatar Medical Journal Pub Date : 2025-09-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5339/qmj.2025.84
Luthvia Annisa, Mohamad S Hakim, Abu T Aman, Tri Wibawa
{"title":"Evaluation of the <i>Candida</i> score as a mortality predictor in hospitalized patients with <i>Candida</i> spp. colonization: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Luthvia Annisa, Mohamad S Hakim, Abu T Aman, Tri Wibawa","doi":"10.5339/qmj.2025.84","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Invasive candidiasis has risen alarmingly over the last decades, with diagnosis often complicated by colonization at multiple body sites. The <i>Candida</i> score offers a simplified tool to help identify patients at risk of invasive candidiasis, particularly in intensive care unit (ICU) settings; however, its applicability in patients with broader characteristics remains uncertain. Moreover, research on <i>Candida</i> colonization and the utility of such tools in Indonesia is still limited. This study aimed to evaluate the association between clinical and laboratory characteristics and patient outcomes, while also assessing the predictive value of the <i>Candida</i> score in both ICU and non-ICU patients at a tertiary academic hospital in Yogyakarta, Indonesia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is an observational retrospective cohort study. During the period of January 2019 to December 2021, recorded laboratory data and clinical characteristics of patients (ICU and non-ICU patients) whose specimens yielded <i>Candida</i> spp. were collected through electronic health records. The correlation of laboratory profile and clinical characteristics with the outcome was analyzed comparatively using bivariate and multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ward status, length of stay, number of comorbid, history of steroids, <i>Candida</i> score of ≥3, and mechanical ventilation were significantly correlated with the non-survivor group. Multivariate analysis showed that intensive care status and a <i>Candida</i> score ≥3 were found to have the strongest and independent correlation with the non-survivor group (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.001; OR 11.8 [95% CI, 4.368-31.962] and <i>p</i> = 0.004; OR, 3.9 [95% CI, 1.562-9.065], respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Being in the ICU and having a <i>Candida</i> score of ≥3 was independently correlated with poorer clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with <i>Candida</i> spp. colonization.</p>","PeriodicalId":53667,"journal":{"name":"Qatar Medical Journal","volume":"2025 3","pages":"84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12444018/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qatar Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5339/qmj.2025.84","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Invasive candidiasis has risen alarmingly over the last decades, with diagnosis often complicated by colonization at multiple body sites. The Candida score offers a simplified tool to help identify patients at risk of invasive candidiasis, particularly in intensive care unit (ICU) settings; however, its applicability in patients with broader characteristics remains uncertain. Moreover, research on Candida colonization and the utility of such tools in Indonesia is still limited. This study aimed to evaluate the association between clinical and laboratory characteristics and patient outcomes, while also assessing the predictive value of the Candida score in both ICU and non-ICU patients at a tertiary academic hospital in Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Materials and methods: This is an observational retrospective cohort study. During the period of January 2019 to December 2021, recorded laboratory data and clinical characteristics of patients (ICU and non-ICU patients) whose specimens yielded Candida spp. were collected through electronic health records. The correlation of laboratory profile and clinical characteristics with the outcome was analyzed comparatively using bivariate and multivariate analysis.

Results: Ward status, length of stay, number of comorbid, history of steroids, Candida score of ≥3, and mechanical ventilation were significantly correlated with the non-survivor group. Multivariate analysis showed that intensive care status and a Candida score ≥3 were found to have the strongest and independent correlation with the non-survivor group (p ≤ 0.001; OR 11.8 [95% CI, 4.368-31.962] and p = 0.004; OR, 3.9 [95% CI, 1.562-9.065], respectively).

Conclusion: Being in the ICU and having a Candida score of ≥3 was independently correlated with poorer clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with Candida spp. colonization.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

念珠菌评分作为念珠菌定植住院患者死亡率预测指标的评估:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:在过去的几十年里,侵袭性念珠菌病的发病率惊人地上升,其诊断往往因在多个身体部位定植而复杂化。念珠菌评分提供了一种简化的工具,帮助识别有侵袭性念珠菌病风险的患者,特别是在重症监护病房(ICU)环境中;然而,其在具有更广泛特征的患者中的适用性仍不确定。此外,对念珠菌定殖和此类工具在印度尼西亚的效用的研究仍然有限。本研究旨在评估临床和实验室特征与患者预后之间的关系,同时也评估念珠菌评分在印度尼西亚日惹的一家三级学术医院的ICU和非ICU患者中的预测价值。材料和方法:这是一项观察性回顾性队列研究。在2019年1月至2021年12月期间,通过电子健康记录收集假丝酵母菌标本的患者(ICU和非ICU患者)的实验室数据和临床特征。采用双变量和多变量分析比较实验室资料和临床特征与预后的相关性。结果:病区状态、住院时间、合并症数量、类固醇史、念珠菌评分≥3分、机械通气与非存活组显著相关。多因素分析显示,重症监护状态和念珠菌评分≥3与非存活组有最强的独立相关性(p≤0.001;OR为11.8 [95% CI, 4.368-31.962]和p = 0.004; OR为3.9 [95% CI, 1.562-9.065])。结论:入住ICU且念珠菌评分≥3分与住院患者念珠菌定植较差的临床预后独立相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Qatar Medical Journal
Qatar Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信