Toes lateral free flap is an ideal method to repair the soft tissue defect of the finger: a single-center retrospective efficacy evaluation of 106 patients.

IF 1 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
International Journal of Burns and Trauma Pub Date : 2025-08-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62347/YPKY1788
Kelie Wang, Bingxi Lei
{"title":"Toes lateral free flap is an ideal method to repair the soft tissue defect of the finger: a single-center retrospective efficacy evaluation of 106 patients.","authors":"Kelie Wang, Bingxi Lei","doi":"10.62347/YPKY1788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the clinical efficacy of transverse wrist crease perforator flap, the retrograde island flap of proper digital artery, the nutrient vascular fascial pedicled skin flap and the toes lateral free flap in the repair of finger soft tissue defects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed the data of 106 patients with finger soft tissue defects who were admitted to Longgang District Orthopedic Hospital from January 2017 to December 2020. The patients were divided into four groups based on the treatment method: Group A (transverse wrist crease perforator flap repair group, N = 27), Group B (retrograde island flap of proper digital artery repair group, N = 23), Group C (nutrient vascular fascial pedicled skin flap repair group, N = 26) and Group D (toes lateral free flap repair group, N = 30). There was no significant difference in sex ratio, age, cause of injury, time of injury and area of defect between the four groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05). We compared the clinical efficacy (including total active motion, two-point discrimination, and cold intolerance), complications, and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in wound recovery time among the four groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05), and the evaluation of skin flap recovery, including color, skin temperature, elasticity, and texture, was superior in Group D compared to Groups A, B, and C (<i>P</i> < 0.05). After one month of follow-up, the total active activity of the affected finger was lower in Group A and Group B than in Group C and Group D (<i>P</i> < 0.05), while there was no significant difference in S2-PD (two-point discrimination) among the groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05). The results of the Cold Intolerance Symptom Severity (CISS) scale after one month of follow-up were highest in Group B, followed by Group A, Group C, and then Group D. After six months and one year follow-up, there was no significant difference in the total active activity among the 4 groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05), and the scores of S2-PD and CISS decreased in each group (<i>P</i> < 0.01). Additionally, Group D exhibited better S2-PD and cold tolerance compared to the other three groups. All patients recovered well after surgery, with one case of vascular crisis in Group A, and no complications such as joint stiffness and postoperative infection were observed in any of the groups. The results indicated that group D had the highest satisfaction level (<i>P</i> < 0.01), with no significant difference among Groups A, B, and C.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The lateral free flap from the toe is an ideal method for repairing soft tissue defects of the finger, as it effectively restores the finger's shape and skin sensation with minimal complications and a concealed donor site.</p>","PeriodicalId":45488,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","volume":"15 4","pages":"149-158"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12444420/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/YPKY1788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of transverse wrist crease perforator flap, the retrograde island flap of proper digital artery, the nutrient vascular fascial pedicled skin flap and the toes lateral free flap in the repair of finger soft tissue defects.

Methods: We reviewed the data of 106 patients with finger soft tissue defects who were admitted to Longgang District Orthopedic Hospital from January 2017 to December 2020. The patients were divided into four groups based on the treatment method: Group A (transverse wrist crease perforator flap repair group, N = 27), Group B (retrograde island flap of proper digital artery repair group, N = 23), Group C (nutrient vascular fascial pedicled skin flap repair group, N = 26) and Group D (toes lateral free flap repair group, N = 30). There was no significant difference in sex ratio, age, cause of injury, time of injury and area of defect between the four groups (P > 0.05). We compared the clinical efficacy (including total active motion, two-point discrimination, and cold intolerance), complications, and patient satisfaction.

Results: There was no significant difference in wound recovery time among the four groups (P > 0.05), and the evaluation of skin flap recovery, including color, skin temperature, elasticity, and texture, was superior in Group D compared to Groups A, B, and C (P < 0.05). After one month of follow-up, the total active activity of the affected finger was lower in Group A and Group B than in Group C and Group D (P < 0.05), while there was no significant difference in S2-PD (two-point discrimination) among the groups (P > 0.05). The results of the Cold Intolerance Symptom Severity (CISS) scale after one month of follow-up were highest in Group B, followed by Group A, Group C, and then Group D. After six months and one year follow-up, there was no significant difference in the total active activity among the 4 groups (P > 0.05), and the scores of S2-PD and CISS decreased in each group (P < 0.01). Additionally, Group D exhibited better S2-PD and cold tolerance compared to the other three groups. All patients recovered well after surgery, with one case of vascular crisis in Group A, and no complications such as joint stiffness and postoperative infection were observed in any of the groups. The results indicated that group D had the highest satisfaction level (P < 0.01), with no significant difference among Groups A, B, and C.

Conclusion: The lateral free flap from the toe is an ideal method for repairing soft tissue defects of the finger, as it effectively restores the finger's shape and skin sensation with minimal complications and a concealed donor site.

趾外侧游离皮瓣是修复手指软组织缺损的理想方法:106例患者的单中心回顾性疗效评价。
目的:比较腕横纹穿支皮瓣、指固有动脉逆行岛状皮瓣、营养血管筋膜带蒂皮瓣和趾外侧游离皮瓣修复手指软组织缺损的临床疗效。方法:回顾2017年1月至2020年12月龙岗区骨科医院收治的106例手指软组织缺损患者的资料。根据治疗方法将患者分为4组:A组(腕横纹穿支皮瓣修复组,27例)、B组(指直动脉逆行岛状皮瓣修复组,23例)、C组(营养血管筋膜带蒂皮瓣修复组,26例)、D组(趾外侧游离皮瓣修复组,30例)。四组患者在性别比例、年龄、损伤原因、损伤时间、缺损面积等方面差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。我们比较了临床疗效(包括总主动运动、两点辨明和冷不耐受)、并发症和患者满意度。结果:四组间创面恢复时间差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05), D组皮瓣恢复的颜色、皮温、弹性、质地评价优于A、B、C组(P < 0.05)。随访1个月后,A、B组患指总活动度低于C、D组(P < 0.05),两组间S2-PD(两点辨别力)差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。随访1个月后,冷不耐受症状严重程度(CISS)评分以B组最高,A组次之,C组次之,d组次之。随访6个月和1年后,4组患者总活动度差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05), S2-PD评分和CISS评分均降低(P < 0.01)。此外,与其他三组相比,D组表现出更好的S2-PD和耐寒性。所有患者术后恢复良好,A组1例发生血管危象,无关节僵硬、术后感染等并发症。结果显示,D组满意度最高(P < 0.01),与A、B、c组差异无统计学意义。结论:趾外侧游离皮瓣修复手指软组织缺损,能有效恢复手指形态和皮肤感觉,并发症少,供区隐蔽,是修复手指软组织缺损的理想方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信