Relationships Between Self-Report Hearing Scales, Listening Effort, and Speech Perception in Cocktail Party Noise in Hearing-Aided Patients.

IF 1.8 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Annie Moulin, Pierre-Emmanuel Aguera, Mathieu Ferschneider
{"title":"Relationships Between Self-Report Hearing Scales, Listening Effort, and Speech Perception in Cocktail Party Noise in Hearing-Aided Patients.","authors":"Annie Moulin, Pierre-Emmanuel Aguera, Mathieu Ferschneider","doi":"10.3390/audiolres15050113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Potential correlations between the scores of self-report questionnaires and speech perception in noise abilities vary widely among studies and have been little explored in patients with conventional hearing aids (HAs). This study aimed to analyse the interrelations between (1) self-report auditory scales (the 15-item short-form of the Speech Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (15iSSQ) and the Extended Listening Effort Assessment Scale (EEAS); (2) speech perception in cocktail party noise, measured with and without HAs; and (3) a self-assessment of the listening effort perceived during the speech in a noise-perception task (TLE) in hearing-aid wearers.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>-Thirty-two patients, aged of 77.5 years (SD = 12) with a mean HA experience of 5.6 years, completed the 15iSSQ and EEAS. Their speech-in-babble-noise perception thresholds (SPIN) were assessed with (HA_SPIN) and without their HAs (UA_SPIN), using a four-alternative forced-choice test in free field, with several fixed Signal to Noise ratios (SNR). They were asked to self-assess their listening effort at each of those SNRs, allowing us to define a task-related listening-effort threshold with (HA_TLE) and without HAs (UA_TLE), i.e., the SNR for which they self-evaluated their listening effort as 5 out of 10.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>15iSSQ decreased as both HA_SPIN (r = -0.47, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and HA_TLE increased (r = -0.36, <i>p</i> < 0.05). The relationship between 15iSSQ<i>Speech</i> and UA_SPIN (and UA_TLE) showed a strong moderating influence by HA experience and HA daily wear (HADW), explaining up to 31% of the variance. 15iSSQ<i>Quality</i> depended on HA SPIN and HA_TLE (r = -0.50, <i>p</i> < 0.01), and the relationship between 15iSSQ<i>Quality</i> and UA_TLE was moderated by HADW. EEAS scores depended on both HA experience and UA_SPIN, with a strong moderating influence by HADW.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Relationships between auditory questionnaires and SPIN are strongly moderated by both HA experience and HADW, even in experienced HA users, showing the need to account for these variables when analysing relationships between questionnaires and hearing-in-noise tests in experienced HA wearers.</p>","PeriodicalId":44133,"journal":{"name":"Audiology Research","volume":"15 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12452308/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres15050113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: Potential correlations between the scores of self-report questionnaires and speech perception in noise abilities vary widely among studies and have been little explored in patients with conventional hearing aids (HAs). This study aimed to analyse the interrelations between (1) self-report auditory scales (the 15-item short-form of the Speech Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (15iSSQ) and the Extended Listening Effort Assessment Scale (EEAS); (2) speech perception in cocktail party noise, measured with and without HAs; and (3) a self-assessment of the listening effort perceived during the speech in a noise-perception task (TLE) in hearing-aid wearers.

Material and methods: -Thirty-two patients, aged of 77.5 years (SD = 12) with a mean HA experience of 5.6 years, completed the 15iSSQ and EEAS. Their speech-in-babble-noise perception thresholds (SPIN) were assessed with (HA_SPIN) and without their HAs (UA_SPIN), using a four-alternative forced-choice test in free field, with several fixed Signal to Noise ratios (SNR). They were asked to self-assess their listening effort at each of those SNRs, allowing us to define a task-related listening-effort threshold with (HA_TLE) and without HAs (UA_TLE), i.e., the SNR for which they self-evaluated their listening effort as 5 out of 10.

Results: 15iSSQ decreased as both HA_SPIN (r = -0.47, p < 0.01) and HA_TLE increased (r = -0.36, p < 0.05). The relationship between 15iSSQSpeech and UA_SPIN (and UA_TLE) showed a strong moderating influence by HA experience and HA daily wear (HADW), explaining up to 31% of the variance. 15iSSQQuality depended on HA SPIN and HA_TLE (r = -0.50, p < 0.01), and the relationship between 15iSSQQuality and UA_TLE was moderated by HADW. EEAS scores depended on both HA experience and UA_SPIN, with a strong moderating influence by HADW.

Conclusions: Relationships between auditory questionnaires and SPIN are strongly moderated by both HA experience and HADW, even in experienced HA users, showing the need to account for these variables when analysing relationships between questionnaires and hearing-in-noise tests in experienced HA wearers.

助听患者自述听力量表、听力与鸡尾酒会噪音言语知觉的关系。
背景/目的:自述问卷得分与语音感知噪音能力之间的潜在相关性在研究中差异很大,并且在传统助听器(HAs)患者中很少被探索。本研究旨在分析(1)自述听觉量表(15项简短形式的言语空间与听力质量量表(15iSSQ))与扩展听力努力评估量表(EEAS)之间的相互关系;(2)鸡尾酒会噪声下的语音感知(含HAs和不含HAs);(3)对助听器佩戴者在语音感知任务(TLE)中所感知到的听力努力进行自我评估。材料与方法:32例患者,年龄77.5岁(SD = 12),平均HA经历5.6年,完成15iSSQ和EEAS。用HA_SPIN和不使用HAs (UA_SPIN)来评估他们的咿呀学语噪声感知阈值(SPIN),使用自由场四选项强迫选择测试,具有几个固定的信噪比(SNR)。他们被要求在每个信噪比下自我评估他们的听力努力,允许我们定义一个与任务相关的听力努力阈值(HA_TLE)和没有HAs (UA_TLE),即他们自我评估听力努力的信噪比为5分(满分10分)。结果:15iSSQ降低,HA_SPIN升高(r = -0.47, p < 0.01), HA_TLE升高(r = -0.36, p < 0.05)。15iSSQSpeech和UA_SPIN(和UA_TLE)之间的关系显示了HA经验和HA日常磨损(HADW)的强烈调节影响,解释了高达31%的方差。15iSSQQuality依赖于HA SPIN和HA_TLE (r = -0.50, p < 0.01),而15iSSQQuality与UA_TLE的关系受haw的调节。EEAS分数依赖于HA经验和UA_SPIN,其中haw具有较强的调节作用。结论:听觉问卷和自旋度之间的关系受到HA经验和高强度听力测试的强烈调节,即使在有经验的HA用户中也是如此,这表明在分析有经验的HA佩戴者的问卷和噪音听力测试之间的关系时,需要考虑这些变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Audiology Research
Audiology Research AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
56
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Audiology Research is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant scientific researches related to the basic science and clinical aspects of the auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear that can be used by clinicians, scientists and specialists to improve understanding and treatment of patients with audiological and neurotological disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信