Telestroke and Emergency Department Imaging: Timing of CT Angiography Within the IV Thrombolytic Decision-Making Sequence.

IF 0.7 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Nick M Murray, Marilyn McKasson, Paul D Johnson, Trina Johnson, Jami Hassler, Bart M Demaerschalk, Shawn Smith, Robert Hoesch, David W Guidry, Chamonix Johnston, H Adrian Püttgen
{"title":"Telestroke and Emergency Department Imaging: Timing of CT Angiography Within the IV Thrombolytic Decision-Making Sequence.","authors":"Nick M Murray, Marilyn McKasson, Paul D Johnson, Trina Johnson, Jami Hassler, Bart M Demaerschalk, Shawn Smith, Robert Hoesch, David W Guidry, Chamonix Johnston, H Adrian Püttgen","doi":"10.1177/19418744251382291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telestroke emergency department (ED) workflow emulates that of in-person care, yet limitations of the virtual interaction may require accommodations. The optimal sequence of non-contrast head CT, cerebral CT angiogram, and decision to infuse IV thrombolytic is not defined for telestroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this twenty-two-hospital multicenter retrospective study between 1/1/2024-12/31/2024, we characterized timing of ED CT angiograms, either bundled with the non-contrast head CT or non-bundled and performed after the IV-thrombolytic decision. The primary outcome was effect of bundling on door to needle time (DTN) when directed by telestroke. Timing of CT scans was determined by time stamps of scout images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 5704 patients were included, with a median age of 65 years (Interquartile range, IQR 58-77) and NIHSS 8 (IQR 6-13). There were 4518 patients in the bundled group (n = 12 hospitals), with time from non-contrast CT to CTA of median 2 min (IQR 0-6 min; vs non-bundled (n = 10 hospitals): 7, 4-15 min; <i>P</i> = .0001). DTN was not statistically different between the groups, bundled vs not: median 47 min (IQR, 35-62 min) vs 54 min (IQR, 41-67 min, <i>P</i> = .21). Door in door out (DIDO) times also were unchanged (169, 117-254 vs 175, 123-247 min; <i>P</i> = .56). These findings, although showing no statistical difference, may have significance for clinical workflows and were consistent with the results of validation analyses conducted on individual patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bundling non-contrast head CT with the CT angiogram before thrombolytic decision did not delay DTN times, trended to clinically improve times, and may be relevant for telestroke ED workflows.</p>","PeriodicalId":46355,"journal":{"name":"Neurohospitalist","volume":" ","pages":"19418744251382291"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12449311/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurohospitalist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19418744251382291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Telestroke emergency department (ED) workflow emulates that of in-person care, yet limitations of the virtual interaction may require accommodations. The optimal sequence of non-contrast head CT, cerebral CT angiogram, and decision to infuse IV thrombolytic is not defined for telestroke.

Methods: In this twenty-two-hospital multicenter retrospective study between 1/1/2024-12/31/2024, we characterized timing of ED CT angiograms, either bundled with the non-contrast head CT or non-bundled and performed after the IV-thrombolytic decision. The primary outcome was effect of bundling on door to needle time (DTN) when directed by telestroke. Timing of CT scans was determined by time stamps of scout images.

Results: In total, 5704 patients were included, with a median age of 65 years (Interquartile range, IQR 58-77) and NIHSS 8 (IQR 6-13). There were 4518 patients in the bundled group (n = 12 hospitals), with time from non-contrast CT to CTA of median 2 min (IQR 0-6 min; vs non-bundled (n = 10 hospitals): 7, 4-15 min; P = .0001). DTN was not statistically different between the groups, bundled vs not: median 47 min (IQR, 35-62 min) vs 54 min (IQR, 41-67 min, P = .21). Door in door out (DIDO) times also were unchanged (169, 117-254 vs 175, 123-247 min; P = .56). These findings, although showing no statistical difference, may have significance for clinical workflows and were consistent with the results of validation analyses conducted on individual patients.

Conclusions: Bundling non-contrast head CT with the CT angiogram before thrombolytic decision did not delay DTN times, trended to clinically improve times, and may be relevant for telestroke ED workflows.

脑卒中和急诊科成像:在静脉溶栓决策序列中CT血管造影的时机。
背景:脑卒中急诊科(ED)的工作流程模拟了面对面护理,但虚拟交互的局限性可能需要调整。非对比头部CT,脑CT血管造影,并决定输注静脉溶栓的最佳顺序没有定义为中风。方法:在这项于2024年1月1日至2024年12月31日期间进行的22家医院的多中心回顾性研究中,我们对ED CT血管造影的时机进行了描述,无论是与非对比头部CT捆绑,还是不捆绑,在静脉溶栓决定后进行。主要观察结果是在电搏指导下捆绑对门静脉到针时间(DTN)的影响。CT扫描的时间由侦察图像的时间戳决定。结果:共纳入5704例患者,中位年龄65岁(四分位数范围,IQR 58-77), NIHSS 8 (IQR 6-13)。捆绑组4518例患者(n = 12家医院),从非对比CT到CTA的中位时间为2分钟(IQR 0-6分钟;与非捆绑组(n = 10家医院)相比:7,4 -15分钟;P = 0.0001)。DTN在两组间无统计学差异,捆绑与未捆绑:中位数为47 min (IQR, 35-62 min) vs 54 min (IQR, 41-67 min, P = 0.21)。门进门出(DIDO)时间也没有变化(169,117-254 vs 175, 123-247分钟;P = 0.56)。这些发现虽然没有统计学差异,但可能对临床工作流程具有重要意义,并且与对个别患者进行的验证分析的结果一致。结论:在决定溶栓前,将头部CT与CT血管造影捆绑检查不会延迟DTN时间,并有临床改善时间的趋势,可能与卒中ED工作流程有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurohospitalist
Neurohospitalist CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
108
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信