{"title":"Assessing and quantifying the interactions between spasticity, proprioception, and motor function of the upper limb after stroke: A meta-analysis.","authors":"Jasmine Usher, Jacqui Morris, Alejandra Aranceta-Garza","doi":"10.1177/20556683251372085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to carry out a systematic review and meta-analysis of available literature on the relationships between spasticity, proprioception and motor function of the upper limb post-stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the terms: stroke; movement; proprioception; spasticity; rehabilitation; and upper limb, a systematic search was conducted on Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science from database inception to November 2023. A study must have assessed two of spasticity, proprioception, or motor function of the upper limb post-stroke to be included. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to investigate changes in time and strength of correlations between variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-two studies were included. Over time, spasticity increased (OR = 0.5, p = 0.0475); proprioception and motor function impairments decreased (OR = 3.15, <i>p</i> < 0.0001; OR = 3.21, <i>p</i> < 0.0001, respectively). The correlation between spasticity and proprioception was weak (r = 0.33, <i>p</i> = 0.0283); between proprioception and motor function was moderate (r = 0.45, <i>p</i> < 0.0001); and between spasticity and motor function was moderate (r = 0.55, <i>p</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the limitation of heterogeneity in the available evidence, relationships between variables were illustrated. Moderate correlations between proprioception and both spasticity and motor function suggest proprioception should be an important target for personalised rehabilitation interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":43319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","volume":"12 ","pages":"20556683251372085"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12444069/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683251372085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to carry out a systematic review and meta-analysis of available literature on the relationships between spasticity, proprioception and motor function of the upper limb post-stroke.
Methods: Using the terms: stroke; movement; proprioception; spasticity; rehabilitation; and upper limb, a systematic search was conducted on Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science from database inception to November 2023. A study must have assessed two of spasticity, proprioception, or motor function of the upper limb post-stroke to be included. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to investigate changes in time and strength of correlations between variables.
Results: Fifty-two studies were included. Over time, spasticity increased (OR = 0.5, p = 0.0475); proprioception and motor function impairments decreased (OR = 3.15, p < 0.0001; OR = 3.21, p < 0.0001, respectively). The correlation between spasticity and proprioception was weak (r = 0.33, p = 0.0283); between proprioception and motor function was moderate (r = 0.45, p < 0.0001); and between spasticity and motor function was moderate (r = 0.55, p < 0.0001).
Conclusion: Despite the limitation of heterogeneity in the available evidence, relationships between variables were illustrated. Moderate correlations between proprioception and both spasticity and motor function suggest proprioception should be an important target for personalised rehabilitation interventions.
目的:本研究的目的是对中风后上肢痉挛、本体感觉和运动功能之间的关系进行系统回顾和荟萃分析。方法:使用术语:笔画;运动;本体感受;痉挛状态;康复;对Scopus、PubMed和Web of Science从建库至2023年11月进行了系统检索。一项研究必须评估中风后上肢的痉挛、本体感觉或运动功能。进行随机效应荟萃分析以调查变量之间的时间变化和相关性强度。结果:纳入52项研究。随着时间的推移,痉挛增加(OR = 0.5, p = 0.0475);本体感觉和运动功能损伤降低(OR = 3.15, p < 0.0001; OR = 3.21, p < 0.0001)。痉挛与本体感觉的相关性较弱(r = 0.33, p = 0.0283);本体感觉与运动功能之间存在中度差异(r = 0.45, p < 0.0001);痉挛与运动功能之间存在中度差异(r = 0.55, p < 0.0001)。结论:尽管现有证据的异质性有限,但变量之间的关系得到了说明。本体感觉与痉挛和运动功能之间的适度相关性表明,本体感觉应该是个性化康复干预的重要目标。