A critical review of long-term funding for reducing violence against women in Australia.

IF 3.4 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Lauren Sheppard, Vicki Brown, Kim Robinson, Marj Moodie
{"title":"A critical review of long-term funding for reducing violence against women in Australia.","authors":"Lauren Sheppard, Vicki Brown, Kim Robinson, Marj Moodie","doi":"10.1071/PU24027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives and importance of study Adequate funding for comprehensive strategies is crucial to eliminating violence against women. This study examined funding committed during a major policy initiative aimed at reducing violence against women in Australia between 2010 and 2023. Study type A retrospective review of federal, state and territory government budget documents to estimate funding levels and examine the distribution of resources across types of strategies aimed at addressing violence against women in Australia. Methods Review and data extraction of budget estimates and activity descriptions addressing violence against women and gender inequality during the time of Australia's National Plan to Reduce Violence Against Women and their Children . Mixed-method analysis explored trends in funding over time by jurisdiction and strategy type and identified priority actions. Results Of the 508 papers screened, 201 documented relevant information with over 900 extractions for activities addressing violence against women (n =797) and gender inequality (n =110), totalling an estimated A$12.1billion. Rather than a steady investment, funding fluctuated, and jurisdictional differences occurred. Supporting people impacted by violence, raising workforce capacity and developing systems to strengthen the response were supported. Primary prevention, incorporating awareness-raising and promoting gender equality, received fewer resources overall, with funding directed towards education, workplace and sports settings. Conclusions During a critical time of action to reduce violence against women, increased government funding occurred, supporting diverse strategies. However, a lack of clarity and consistency in budget reporting contributed to uncertainty in total funding committed over this timeline. Having a fiscal strategy over the entire action plan will embed long-term funding and improve future planning and monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":45898,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Research & Practice","volume":"35 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Research & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PU24027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives and importance of study Adequate funding for comprehensive strategies is crucial to eliminating violence against women. This study examined funding committed during a major policy initiative aimed at reducing violence against women in Australia between 2010 and 2023. Study type A retrospective review of federal, state and territory government budget documents to estimate funding levels and examine the distribution of resources across types of strategies aimed at addressing violence against women in Australia. Methods Review and data extraction of budget estimates and activity descriptions addressing violence against women and gender inequality during the time of Australia's National Plan to Reduce Violence Against Women and their Children . Mixed-method analysis explored trends in funding over time by jurisdiction and strategy type and identified priority actions. Results Of the 508 papers screened, 201 documented relevant information with over 900 extractions for activities addressing violence against women (n =797) and gender inequality (n =110), totalling an estimated A$12.1billion. Rather than a steady investment, funding fluctuated, and jurisdictional differences occurred. Supporting people impacted by violence, raising workforce capacity and developing systems to strengthen the response were supported. Primary prevention, incorporating awareness-raising and promoting gender equality, received fewer resources overall, with funding directed towards education, workplace and sports settings. Conclusions During a critical time of action to reduce violence against women, increased government funding occurred, supporting diverse strategies. However, a lack of clarity and consistency in budget reporting contributed to uncertainty in total funding committed over this timeline. Having a fiscal strategy over the entire action plan will embed long-term funding and improve future planning and monitoring.

对澳大利亚减少对妇女的暴力行为的长期资助的批判性审查。
为全面战略提供充足的资金对消除对妇女的暴力行为至关重要。这项研究调查了2010年至2023年期间澳大利亚一项旨在减少暴力侵害妇女行为的重大政策倡议所承诺的资金。研究类型对联邦、州和地区政府预算文件进行回顾性审查,以估计资金水平,并审查旨在解决澳大利亚对妇女的暴力行为的各种战略的资源分配情况。方法在澳大利亚减少对妇女及其子女的暴力行为国家计划实施期间,对涉及暴力侵害妇女行为和性别不平等问题的概算和活动说明进行审查和数据提取。混合方法分析按辖区和战略类型探讨了长期以来的供资趋势,并确定了优先行动。在筛选的508篇论文中,201篇记录了相关信息,其中900多篇摘录涉及解决暴力侵害妇女行为(n =797)和性别不平等(n =110)的活动,估计总额为121亿澳元。不是稳定的投资,而是资金波动,而且出现了管辖权差异。支持受暴力影响的人、提高劳动力能力和制定加强应对措施的制度。纳入提高认识和促进性别平等的初级预防总体上获得的资源较少,资金主要用于教育、工作场所和体育环境。在采取行动减少暴力侵害妇女行为的关键时刻,政府增加了资金,支持各种战略。然而,预算报告缺乏明确性和一致性导致在这一时间表内承诺的资金总额不确定。在整个行动计划中制定财政战略将纳入长期资金,并改善未来的规划和监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health Research & Practice
Public Health Research & Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Public Health Research & Practice is an open-access, quarterly, online journal with a strong focus on the connection between research, policy and practice. It publishes innovative, high-quality papers that inform public health policy and practice, paying particular attention to innovations, data and perspectives from policy and practice. The journal is published by the Sax Institute, a national leader in promoting the use of research evidence in health policy. Formerly known as The NSW Public Health Bulletin, the journal has a long history. It was published by the NSW Ministry of Health for nearly a quarter of a century. Responsibility for its publication transferred to the Sax Institute in 2014, and the journal receives guidance from an expert editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信