Modulating Multisensory Processing: Interactions Between Semantic Congruence and Temporal Synchrony.

IF 1.8 Q2 Medicine
Susan Geffen, Taylor Beck, Christopher W Robinson
{"title":"Modulating Multisensory Processing: Interactions Between Semantic Congruence and Temporal Synchrony.","authors":"Susan Geffen, Taylor Beck, Christopher W Robinson","doi":"10.3390/vision9030074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Presenting information to multiple sensory modalities often facilitates or interferes with processing, yet the mechanisms remain unclear. Using a Stroop-like task, the two reported experiments examined how semantic congruency and incongruency in one sensory modality affect processing and responding in a different modality. Participants were presented with pictures and sounds simultaneously (Experiment 1) or asynchronously (Experiment 2) and had to respond whether the visual or auditory stimulus was an animal or vehicle, while ignoring the other modality. Semantic congruency and incongruency in the unattended modality both affected responses in the attended modality, with visual stimuli having larger effects on auditory processing than the reverse (Experiment 1). Effects of visual input on auditory processing decreased under longer SOAs, while effects of auditory input on visual processing increased over SOAs and were correlated with relative processing speed (Experiment 2). These results suggest that congruence and modality both impact multisensory processing.</p>","PeriodicalId":36586,"journal":{"name":"Vision (Switzerland)","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12452723/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vision (Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/vision9030074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Presenting information to multiple sensory modalities often facilitates or interferes with processing, yet the mechanisms remain unclear. Using a Stroop-like task, the two reported experiments examined how semantic congruency and incongruency in one sensory modality affect processing and responding in a different modality. Participants were presented with pictures and sounds simultaneously (Experiment 1) or asynchronously (Experiment 2) and had to respond whether the visual or auditory stimulus was an animal or vehicle, while ignoring the other modality. Semantic congruency and incongruency in the unattended modality both affected responses in the attended modality, with visual stimuli having larger effects on auditory processing than the reverse (Experiment 1). Effects of visual input on auditory processing decreased under longer SOAs, while effects of auditory input on visual processing increased over SOAs and were correlated with relative processing speed (Experiment 2). These results suggest that congruence and modality both impact multisensory processing.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

调节多感觉加工:语义一致性和时间同步之间的相互作用。
将信息呈现给多种感觉模式通常会促进或干扰处理,但机制尚不清楚。使用类似stroop的任务,两个报告的实验研究了语义一致性和语义不一致性在一种感觉模态中如何影响不同模态的加工和反应。参与者被同时(实验1)或不同步(实验2)呈现图片和声音,并被要求对视觉或听觉刺激是动物还是交通工具做出反应,同时忽略其他形式。无注意模态的语义一致性和语义不一致性都影响有注意模态的反应,视觉刺激对听觉加工的影响大于听觉刺激对听觉加工的影响(实验1)。视觉输入对听觉加工的影响随时间的延长而减弱,而听觉输入对视觉加工的影响随时间的延长而增强,并与相对加工速度相关(实验2)。这些结果表明,一致性和模态都影响多感觉加工。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vision (Switzerland)
Vision (Switzerland) Health Professions-Optometry
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信