The Efficacy of Robot-assisted Modified Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis.
Wei Yuan, Xinchun Liu, Lin Cong, Haitao Zhu, Lei Pei, Han Wang, Yue Zhu
{"title":"The Efficacy of Robot-assisted Modified Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis.","authors":"Wei Yuan, Xinchun Liu, Lin Cong, Haitao Zhu, Lei Pei, Han Wang, Yue Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Robotic technology is increasingly used in spine surgery, few studies report its application and outcomes for ankylosing spondylitis (AS)-related thoracolumbar fractures. This study was designed to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy of robot-assisted (RA) modified minimally invasive surgery for treating thoracolumbar fractures in AS patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, patients diagnosed with thoracolumbar fractures with AS were grouped by surgical techniques into two groups: RA modified minimally invasive surgery group (RA group) or fluoroscopy-assisted open posterior fixation surgery group (FA group). Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy exposure time, radiation dose, hospital stay, and complications of the two groups were recorded. According to Gertzbein-Robbins criteria, the accuracy of screw implantation was evaluated by CT within 1 week after surgery. During the follow-up period, pain and nerve function were evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) and American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 27 patients with thoracolumbar fractures with AS were included in this study, with 13 patients in the RA group and 14 in the FA group. Baseline characteristics showed no intergroup differences. The RA group demonstrated significantly less intraoperative blood loss (287.5±106.1 ml vs. 561±209.8 ml, P < 0.05), longer fluoroscopy exposure time (116.4±16.5 s vs. 35.6±9.1 s, P < 0.05), higher total radiation dose (163.3±25.7 mGy vs. 80.7±24.8 mGy, P < 0.05), and shorter hospital stay (15.9±3.7 days vs. 22.1±5.9 days, P < 0.05) compared to the FA group. Both groups were followed up for 6 months. Post-operatively, VAS decreased significantly in both groups compared to preoperative values (P<0.05). Notably, the RA group exhibited significantly lower VAS scores than the FA group at both one week and three months post - surgery (P<0.05). In terms of neurological function recovery, no significant differences were found between the two groups (P>0.05). In terms of screw accuracy, the RA group (94.2%, 131/159) had a notably larger proportion of clinically acceptable screws (grades A and B) than the FG group (86.8%, 131/151, p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RA modified minimally invasive surgery has merits including reduced blood loss, shortened hospital stay, better pain relief, and improved the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion compared with the FA open surgery in treating thoracolumbar fractures with AS. However, RA technique could increase the intraoperative radiation exposure of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"124496"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124496","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Robotic technology is increasingly used in spine surgery, few studies report its application and outcomes for ankylosing spondylitis (AS)-related thoracolumbar fractures. This study was designed to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy of robot-assisted (RA) modified minimally invasive surgery for treating thoracolumbar fractures in AS patients.
Methods: In this retrospective study, patients diagnosed with thoracolumbar fractures with AS were grouped by surgical techniques into two groups: RA modified minimally invasive surgery group (RA group) or fluoroscopy-assisted open posterior fixation surgery group (FA group). Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy exposure time, radiation dose, hospital stay, and complications of the two groups were recorded. According to Gertzbein-Robbins criteria, the accuracy of screw implantation was evaluated by CT within 1 week after surgery. During the follow-up period, pain and nerve function were evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) and American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) scale.
Results: A total of 27 patients with thoracolumbar fractures with AS were included in this study, with 13 patients in the RA group and 14 in the FA group. Baseline characteristics showed no intergroup differences. The RA group demonstrated significantly less intraoperative blood loss (287.5±106.1 ml vs. 561±209.8 ml, P < 0.05), longer fluoroscopy exposure time (116.4±16.5 s vs. 35.6±9.1 s, P < 0.05), higher total radiation dose (163.3±25.7 mGy vs. 80.7±24.8 mGy, P < 0.05), and shorter hospital stay (15.9±3.7 days vs. 22.1±5.9 days, P < 0.05) compared to the FA group. Both groups were followed up for 6 months. Post-operatively, VAS decreased significantly in both groups compared to preoperative values (P<0.05). Notably, the RA group exhibited significantly lower VAS scores than the FA group at both one week and three months post - surgery (P<0.05). In terms of neurological function recovery, no significant differences were found between the two groups (P>0.05). In terms of screw accuracy, the RA group (94.2%, 131/159) had a notably larger proportion of clinically acceptable screws (grades A and B) than the FG group (86.8%, 131/151, p < 0.05).
Conclusion: RA modified minimally invasive surgery has merits including reduced blood loss, shortened hospital stay, better pain relief, and improved the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion compared with the FA open surgery in treating thoracolumbar fractures with AS. However, RA technique could increase the intraoperative radiation exposure of patients.
目的:机器人技术越来越多地应用于脊柱外科,但很少有研究报道其在强直性脊柱炎(AS)相关胸腰椎骨折中的应用和结果。本研究旨在全面评估机器人辅助(RA)改良微创手术治疗AS胸腰椎骨折的疗效。方法:本回顾性研究将诊断为胸腰椎骨折合并AS的患者按手术技术分为RA改良微创手术组(RA组)和透视辅助下切开后路固定手术组(FA组)。记录两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、透视照射时间、放射剂量、住院时间及并发症。根据Gertzbein-Robbins标准,术后1周内CT评估螺钉植入的准确性。随访期间采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)和美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)评分法评估疼痛和神经功能。结果:共纳入27例胸腰椎骨折合并AS患者,其中RA组13例,FA组14例。基线特征未显示组间差异。RA组术中出血量明显少于FA组(287.5±106.1 ml vs. 561±209.8 ml, P < 0.05),透视暴露时间明显延长(116.4±16.5 s vs. 35.6±9.1 s, P < 0.05),总辐射剂量明显增加(163.3±25.7 mGy vs. 80.7±24.8 mGy, P < 0.05),住院时间明显缩短(15.9±3.7 d vs. 22.1±5.9 d, P < 0.05)。两组均随访6个月。术后两组VAS评分均较术前显著降低(P0.05)。在螺钉准确性方面,RA组临床可接受螺钉(a级和B级)比例(94.2%,131/159)明显高于FG组(86.8%,131/151,p < 0.05)。结论:与FA开放性手术相比,RA改良微创手术治疗AS胸腰椎骨折具有出血量减少、住院时间缩短、疼痛缓解效果好、椎弓根螺钉置入准确性提高等优点。然而,RA技术可能增加患者术中辐射暴露。
期刊介绍:
World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
The journal''s mission is to:
-To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care.
-To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide.
-To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients.
Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS