Optimal Application Indices for Shunt Surgery for Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus with an Evans Index Below 0.3.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ryosuke Takagi, Taishi Nakamura, Kiyoshi Takagi, Yuriko Takeda, Makoto Ohtake, Shuichiro Asano, Satoshi Hori, Hidetaka Onodera, Takashi Kawasaki, Katsumi Sakata, Kensuke Tateishi, Tetsuya Yamamoto
{"title":"Optimal Application Indices for Shunt Surgery for Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus with an Evans Index Below 0.3.","authors":"Ryosuke Takagi, Taishi Nakamura, Kiyoshi Takagi, Yuriko Takeda, Makoto Ohtake, Shuichiro Asano, Satoshi Hori, Hidetaka Onodera, Takashi Kawasaki, Katsumi Sakata, Kensuke Tateishi, Tetsuya Yamamoto","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is a neurological disorder characterized by three primary symptoms (gait disturbance, cognitive impairment, and urinary incontinence), accompanied by specific morphological imaging features. Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is characterized by symptoms without identifiable secondary causes. The Evans index (EI) is traditionally used to assess ventricular enlargement, with values >0.3 indicating iNPH. Herein, we investigated the efficacy of shunt surgery in patients with iNPH and EI ≤0.3, who may still benefit from the procedure despite not meeting conventional diagnostic criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed consecutive iNPH patients categorized into two groups based on EI: ≤0.3 (atypical iNPH group = discovery group) and >0.3 (probable iNPH group = control group). The shunt response rate was subsequently assessed. Morphological magnetic resonance (MR) markers, including EI and the z-Evans index, were analyzed to identify predictors of shunt response.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 231 patients were eligible for analysis, including an atypical iNPH group of 48 patients and a probable iNPH group of 183 patients. The mean EI value was 0.33 ± 0.04, and VA shunt surgery significantly improved symptoms (p <0.001), with responder rates of 83.3% and 90.2% in atypical iNPH and probable iNPH group, respectively. In the atypical iNPH group, multivariate analysis identified the z-Evans index as a morphological MR marker of shunt response (p = 0.043).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The response rates to shunt surgery were comparable in patients with EI ≤0.3 and EI >0.3 without statistical significance. The z-Evans index is a useful tool for identifying shunt responders among those with a lower EI, potentially expanding the therapeutic options for patients previously considered ineligible.</p>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"124494"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124494","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is a neurological disorder characterized by three primary symptoms (gait disturbance, cognitive impairment, and urinary incontinence), accompanied by specific morphological imaging features. Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is characterized by symptoms without identifiable secondary causes. The Evans index (EI) is traditionally used to assess ventricular enlargement, with values >0.3 indicating iNPH. Herein, we investigated the efficacy of shunt surgery in patients with iNPH and EI ≤0.3, who may still benefit from the procedure despite not meeting conventional diagnostic criteria.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive iNPH patients categorized into two groups based on EI: ≤0.3 (atypical iNPH group = discovery group) and >0.3 (probable iNPH group = control group). The shunt response rate was subsequently assessed. Morphological magnetic resonance (MR) markers, including EI and the z-Evans index, were analyzed to identify predictors of shunt response.

Results: After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 231 patients were eligible for analysis, including an atypical iNPH group of 48 patients and a probable iNPH group of 183 patients. The mean EI value was 0.33 ± 0.04, and VA shunt surgery significantly improved symptoms (p <0.001), with responder rates of 83.3% and 90.2% in atypical iNPH and probable iNPH group, respectively. In the atypical iNPH group, multivariate analysis identified the z-Evans index as a morphological MR marker of shunt response (p = 0.043).

Conclusion: The response rates to shunt surgery were comparable in patients with EI ≤0.3 and EI >0.3 without statistical significance. The z-Evans index is a useful tool for identifying shunt responders among those with a lower EI, potentially expanding the therapeutic options for patients previously considered ineligible.

Evans指数低于0.3的特发性常压脑积水分流手术的最佳应用指标。
背景:常压性脑积水(NPH)是一种神经系统疾病,以步态障碍、认知障碍和尿失禁为主要症状,并伴有特定的形态学影像学特征。特发性常压脑积水(iNPH)的特点是没有明确的继发原因的症状。Evans指数(EI)传统上用于评估心室扩大,>0.3表示iNPH。在此,我们研究了iNPH和EI≤0.3的患者的分流手术的疗效,尽管不符合传统的诊断标准,这些患者仍然可能从手术中受益。方法:回顾性分析连续iNPH患者,根据EI分为≤0.3组(非典型iNPH组=发现组)和>0.3组(可能iNPH组=对照组)。随后评估分流反应率。形态学磁共振(MR)标记,包括EI和z-Evans指数,被分析以确定分流反应的预测因子。结果:应用纳入和排除标准后,231例患者符合分析条件,其中非典型iNPH组48例,可能iNPH组183例。平均EI值为0.33±0.04,VA分流术明显改善了症状(p)。结论:EI≤0.3和EI >0.3患者分流术的有效率相当,无统计学意义。z-Evans指数是在低EI患者中识别分流反应者的有用工具,有可能为以前认为不合格的患者扩大治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World neurosurgery
World neurosurgery CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
1765
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal''s mission is to: -To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care. -To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide. -To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients. Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信