Direct versus Indirect Nursing Care in Intensive Care Units during COVID-19 (An Observational Study).

IF 1.2 Q3 NURSING
Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research Pub Date : 2025-09-11 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_341_23
Marzieh Adel Mehraban, Fateme Asvad, Mahboubeh Rasouli
{"title":"Direct versus Indirect Nursing Care in Intensive Care Units during COVID-19 (An Observational Study).","authors":"Marzieh Adel Mehraban, Fateme Asvad, Mahboubeh Rasouli","doi":"10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_341_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nurses play a crucial role in providing care in Intensive Care Units (ICUs). This study aimed to compare the time spent and types of direct and indirect nursing care provided to patients during COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This observational study was conducted in the ICU of Hafthome-Tir Hospital, Tehran, in 2022. The activities of 42 randomly selected nurses were continuously observed and recorded, focusing on direct and indirect care as per the revised International Classification for Nursing Practice checklist. Data were analyzed using dependent <i>t</i>-test (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The data showed that the highest average time for direct care spent on cardiopulmonary resuscitation was 27.30 (6.10) minutes, while the least time for deltoid injections was 4.8 (2.9) minutes. In indirect care, the most time was spent writing reports, 34.90 (10.50) minutes, and the least time spent removing personal protective equipment was 6.11 (3.19) minutes. During data collection, 19 procedures were added to the nursing care checklist due to COVID-19. A dependent <i>t</i>-test showed a significant difference between direct and indirect ICU nursing care (t= -6.62, df = 41, <i>p</i> < 0.001), indicating more time was spent on indirect care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings showed indirect care was provided more frequently than direct care, highlighting the need to reassess nursing care delivery methods. The increased demand for indirect care is attributed to time and staffing shortages, along with a rise in patient numbers and hospitalizations compared to pre-COVID conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":44816,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research","volume":"30 5","pages":"646-652"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12445906/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_341_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nurses play a crucial role in providing care in Intensive Care Units (ICUs). This study aimed to compare the time spent and types of direct and indirect nursing care provided to patients during COVID-19 pandemic.

Materials and methods: This observational study was conducted in the ICU of Hafthome-Tir Hospital, Tehran, in 2022. The activities of 42 randomly selected nurses were continuously observed and recorded, focusing on direct and indirect care as per the revised International Classification for Nursing Practice checklist. Data were analyzed using dependent t-test (p > 0.05).

Results: The data showed that the highest average time for direct care spent on cardiopulmonary resuscitation was 27.30 (6.10) minutes, while the least time for deltoid injections was 4.8 (2.9) minutes. In indirect care, the most time was spent writing reports, 34.90 (10.50) minutes, and the least time spent removing personal protective equipment was 6.11 (3.19) minutes. During data collection, 19 procedures were added to the nursing care checklist due to COVID-19. A dependent t-test showed a significant difference between direct and indirect ICU nursing care (t= -6.62, df = 41, p < 0.001), indicating more time was spent on indirect care.

Conclusions: The findings showed indirect care was provided more frequently than direct care, highlighting the need to reassess nursing care delivery methods. The increased demand for indirect care is attributed to time and staffing shortages, along with a rise in patient numbers and hospitalizations compared to pre-COVID conditions.

COVID-19期间重症监护病房的直接与间接护理(一项观察性研究)。
背景:护士在重症监护病房(icu)中发挥着至关重要的作用。本研究旨在比较COVID-19大流行期间为患者提供的直接和间接护理的时间和类型。材料和方法:本观察性研究于2022年在德黑兰hafhome - tir医院ICU进行。随机选取42名护士,按照修订后的国际护理实践分类清单,对其直接护理和间接护理进行持续观察和记录。资料分析采用相关t检验(p < 0.05)。结果:直接护理心肺复苏平均时间最长为27.30 (6.10)min,三角肌注射平均时间最短为4.8 (2.9)min。在间接护理中,撰写报告花费的时间最多,为34.90(10.50)分钟,拆除个人防护用品花费的时间最少,为6.11(3.19)分钟。在数据收集过程中,19项程序被添加到COVID-19护理清单中。依赖t检验显示ICU直接护理与间接护理之间存在显著差异(t= -6.62, df = 41, p < 0.001),表明间接护理花费的时间更多。结论:研究结果显示,间接护理比直接护理更频繁,强调需要重新评估护理提供方法。对间接护理需求的增加归因于时间和人员短缺,以及与covid前相比患者人数和住院人数的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
46 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信