Neuraxial Anesthesia and Cancer Recurrence Following Prostatectomy: Thinking Outside the Box.

Abstract

Radical prostatectomy is the standard of care for the treatment of early, clinically localized prostate cancer (PC). In addition to known clinical prognosticators, perioperative conditions and the type of anesthesia may affect clinical outcomes through several mechanisms that favor a tumor-propagating state, including activation of the sympathetic system, increased opioid requirements, and inflammation. In this review, we provide an overview of the impact of the perioperative period on PC prognosis and patient outcomes. A non-systematic literature review was conducted to investigate the possible association between neuraxial anesthesia and outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer. The following keywords were used: "cancer recurrence" OR "cancer prognosis" OR "metastasis" AND "neuraxial anesthesia" AND "prostate cancer". Eligible studies were summarized in the form of a narrative review. In the era of limited use of ERAS protocols, the implementation of neuraxial anesthesia was found to reduce mortality after RP for primary prostate cancer when compared to general anesthesia. Although there was no significant association between anesthetic technique and radiological or biochemical-free survival, regional anesthesia may have an impact on short-term survival in patients with severe comorbidities, involving pulmonary complications and thrombosis. The effect of anesthetic technique on PC patient outcomes remains elusive, although preliminary retrospective evidence suggests a possible positive effect of neuraxial anesthesia on patient outcomes. As the perioperative period is considered a vulnerable timeframe for these patients, the role of the leadership dyad of surgeon and onco-anesthesiologist is crucial.