Assessing Prescribing Patterns of Nonstatins as Add-on Therapy for Secondary Prevention in a Federally Qualified Health Center.

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Pharmacy Pub Date : 2025-09-06 DOI:10.3390/pharmacy13050129
Sabrina Guerra, Kathryn P Lin, Ahmed S Kenawy, Chanhyun Park, Morgan P Stewart
{"title":"Assessing Prescribing Patterns of Nonstatins as Add-on Therapy for Secondary Prevention in a Federally Qualified Health Center.","authors":"Sabrina Guerra, Kathryn P Lin, Ahmed S Kenawy, Chanhyun Park, Morgan P Stewart","doi":"10.3390/pharmacy13050129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lipid management is a key aspect of secondary atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) prevention. However, real-world studies show that ~72-88% of patients with ASCVD fail to meet their low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target. Nonstatin agents are available as add-on therapies that can be utilized when maximally tolerated statins are insufficient to achieve LDL-C goals. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the current prescribing habits of nonstatins as add-on therapy to statins for secondary ASCVD prevention at a federally qualified health center (FQHC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were included if they had a history of clinical ASCVD, ≥1 lipid panel obtained during the study period, and were prescribed any intensity statin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 398 included participants, 11.1% were prescribed nonstatin therapy and 35.9% were meeting a LDL-C target of <70 mg/dL. There was a significant association between being prescribed ezetimibe based on the type of healthcare coverage (<i>p</i> = 0.04) and a higher number of ASCVD qualifying indications (<i>p</i> < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, nonstatins were found to be underutilized for LDL-C management in this underserved population. Future initiatives should target ways to optimize nonstatin therapy to optimize secondary ASCVD prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":30544,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy","volume":"13 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12452511/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy13050129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lipid management is a key aspect of secondary atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) prevention. However, real-world studies show that ~72-88% of patients with ASCVD fail to meet their low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target. Nonstatin agents are available as add-on therapies that can be utilized when maximally tolerated statins are insufficient to achieve LDL-C goals. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the current prescribing habits of nonstatins as add-on therapy to statins for secondary ASCVD prevention at a federally qualified health center (FQHC).

Methods: Patients were included if they had a history of clinical ASCVD, ≥1 lipid panel obtained during the study period, and were prescribed any intensity statin.

Results: Among 398 included participants, 11.1% were prescribed nonstatin therapy and 35.9% were meeting a LDL-C target of <70 mg/dL. There was a significant association between being prescribed ezetimibe based on the type of healthcare coverage (p = 0.04) and a higher number of ASCVD qualifying indications (p < 0.01).

Conclusions: Overall, nonstatins were found to be underutilized for LDL-C management in this underserved population. Future initiatives should target ways to optimize nonstatin therapy to optimize secondary ASCVD prevention.

评估非他汀类药物作为二级预防辅助治疗的处方模式
背景:脂质管理是继发性动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)预防的一个关键方面。然而,现实世界的研究表明,约72-88%的ASCVD患者未能达到他们的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)目标。当他汀类药物的最大耐受性不足以达到LDL-C目标时,可以使用非他汀类药物作为附加治疗。本回顾性研究旨在评估目前在联邦合格卫生中心(FQHC)非他汀类药物作为他汀类药物辅助治疗用于继发性ASCVD预防的处方习惯。方法:纳入有临床ASCVD病史的患者,研究期间获得≥1个脂质面板,并给予任意强度的他汀类药物。结果:在398名纳入的参与者中,11.1%的人接受了非他汀类药物治疗,35.9%的人达到了LDL-C目标(p = 0.04), ASCVD符合适应症的数量更高(p < 0.01)。结论:总体而言,非他汀类药物在这一服务不足人群的LDL-C管理中未得到充分利用。未来的举措应该针对优化非他汀类药物治疗的方法,以优化继发性ASCVD的预防。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmacy
Pharmacy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
9.10%
发文量
141
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信