From Emergency to Strategy: Human Security Priorities After the Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes Using Hesitant Fuzzy AHP.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Risk Analysis Pub Date : 2025-09-22 DOI:10.1111/risa.70115
Rafet Emre Toramanoğlu, Sinem Yıldırımalp, Handan Akyiğit, Hatice Turut, Fatma Zehra Toçoğlu, Havva Sert, B Yasin Çakmak, Büşra Yiğit, Bora Yenihan
{"title":"From Emergency to Strategy: Human Security Priorities After the Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes Using Hesitant Fuzzy AHP.","authors":"Rafet Emre Toramanoğlu, Sinem Yıldırımalp, Handan Akyiğit, Hatice Turut, Fatma Zehra Toçoğlu, Havva Sert, B Yasin Çakmak, Büşra Yiğit, Bora Yenihan","doi":"10.1111/risa.70115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Due to periodic shifts in human security needs post-disaster, recovery processes remain dynamic. However, no comprehensive study in the literature addresses periodic differences in human security dimensions. This research is the first to examine post-disaster human security dimensions with a holistic and systematic approach, and it fills a critical gap in this area. In the study, the Hesitant Fuzzy AHP (HFAHP) method was applied based on decision makers' (DMs) assessments with strategic planning authority during the February 6 Kahramanmaraş/Türkiye earthquakes. Findings highlight short-term priorities in environmental and health security, while economic security emerges as a key long-term determinant. In addition, it has been determined that political and community security dimensions gain more importance in the long term. The study also finds that failure to address these shifting priorities may pose significant risks: In the short term, unmet environmental and health needs can lead to public health crises and hinder immediate response efforts; in the long term, neglecting economic, political, and community security can jeopardize recovery, increase inequality, and undermine resilience. This study provides a new framework that guides the strategic prioritization process for disaster management and human security policies based on the experience of the disaster. The findings guide policymakers to ensure sustainable human security by improving post-disaster resource allocation and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":21472,"journal":{"name":"Risk Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.70115","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to periodic shifts in human security needs post-disaster, recovery processes remain dynamic. However, no comprehensive study in the literature addresses periodic differences in human security dimensions. This research is the first to examine post-disaster human security dimensions with a holistic and systematic approach, and it fills a critical gap in this area. In the study, the Hesitant Fuzzy AHP (HFAHP) method was applied based on decision makers' (DMs) assessments with strategic planning authority during the February 6 Kahramanmaraş/Türkiye earthquakes. Findings highlight short-term priorities in environmental and health security, while economic security emerges as a key long-term determinant. In addition, it has been determined that political and community security dimensions gain more importance in the long term. The study also finds that failure to address these shifting priorities may pose significant risks: In the short term, unmet environmental and health needs can lead to public health crises and hinder immediate response efforts; in the long term, neglecting economic, political, and community security can jeopardize recovery, increase inequality, and undermine resilience. This study provides a new framework that guides the strategic prioritization process for disaster management and human security policies based on the experience of the disaster. The findings guide policymakers to ensure sustainable human security by improving post-disaster resource allocation and management.

从突发事件到战略:kahramanmaraki地震后人类安全优先事项的犹豫模糊层次分析法。
由于灾后人类安全需求的周期性变化,恢复过程仍然是动态的。然而,文献中没有全面的研究涉及人类安全维度的周期性差异。这项研究首次以整体和系统的方法研究灾后人类安全的各个方面,填补了这一领域的一个关键空白。在研究中,基于具有战略规划权限的决策者(DMs)对2月6日kahramanmaraku / trkiye地震的评估,应用犹豫模糊层次分析法(HFAHP)。调查结果强调了环境和健康安全的短期优先事项,而经济安全则成为关键的长期决定因素。此外,人们已经确定,政治和社区安全方面从长远来看将更加重要。研究还发现,不解决这些不断变化的优先事项可能会带来重大风险:在短期内,未满足的环境和卫生需求可能导致公共卫生危机,并阻碍立即作出反应的努力;从长远来看,忽视经济、政治和社区安全可能危及复苏,加剧不平等,并削弱复原力。这项研究提供了一个新的框架,指导灾害管理和人类安全政策的战略优先次序过程。研究结果指导决策者通过改善灾后资源分配和管理来确保可持续的人类安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Risk Analysis
Risk Analysis 数学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
10.50%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the Society for Risk Analysis, Risk Analysis is ranked among the top 10 journals in the ISI Journal Citation Reports under the social sciences, mathematical methods category, and provides a focal point for new developments in the field of risk analysis. This international peer-reviewed journal is committed to publishing critical empirical research and commentaries dealing with risk issues. The topics covered include: • Human health and safety risks • Microbial risks • Engineering • Mathematical modeling • Risk characterization • Risk communication • Risk management and decision-making • Risk perception, acceptability, and ethics • Laws and regulatory policy • Ecological risks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信