Evergreen species exhibit higher growth resistance under drought: insights from carbon-water relations.

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
Xinyi Guan, Steven Jansen, Lian-Xia Huang, Shu-Lin Chen, Shi-Dan Zhu
{"title":"Evergreen species exhibit higher growth resistance under drought: insights from carbon-water relations.","authors":"Xinyi Guan, Steven Jansen, Lian-Xia Huang, Shu-Lin Chen, Shi-Dan Zhu","doi":"10.1093/treephys/tpaf115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>More frequent and extreme droughts under global climate change pose major threats to plant diversity and ecosystem productivity. Plant growth is constrained by the interplay between hydraulic failure and reduced carbon assimilation; however, how these carbon-water dynamics jointly regulate growth across functional types, particularly under varying drought intensity and duration, remains poorly understood. We conducted a meta-analysis of 249 studies covering 236 species across diverse biomes to examine differences in growth, carbohydrate allocation, and hydraulic responses to drought among functional groups (e.g., evergreen vs. deciduous, angiosperm vs. gymnosperm, adult plants vs. seedling, etc.). We also evaluated how carbon-water dynamics mediate plant growth under drought stress. We found that drought stress consistently reduced plant growth, photosynthetic rate, water potentials and the consequent hydraulic conductivity across species. Growth responses were strongly influenced by leaf phenology (evergreen vs. deciduous) and drought intensity. Evergreen species showed greater growth resistance to drought than deciduous species, by maintaining photosynthesis and hydraulic function despite faster declines in water potential. Evergreen species exhibited linear reductions in growth, photosynthesis, and water potentials with increasing drought intensity, reflecting gradual physiological adjustments indicative of drought resistance. In contrast, deciduous species showed significant limitation of photosynthesis and growth at drought onset. Our findings provide a quantitative framework linking plant traits related to carbohydrates and hydraulic to growth responses under drought. Understanding how drought affects carbon-water strategy based on leaf phenology advances predictive vegetation models of responses to climate extremes, with critical implications for ecosystem management and maintaining species diversity under global change scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":23286,"journal":{"name":"Tree physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tree physiology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpaf115","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

More frequent and extreme droughts under global climate change pose major threats to plant diversity and ecosystem productivity. Plant growth is constrained by the interplay between hydraulic failure and reduced carbon assimilation; however, how these carbon-water dynamics jointly regulate growth across functional types, particularly under varying drought intensity and duration, remains poorly understood. We conducted a meta-analysis of 249 studies covering 236 species across diverse biomes to examine differences in growth, carbohydrate allocation, and hydraulic responses to drought among functional groups (e.g., evergreen vs. deciduous, angiosperm vs. gymnosperm, adult plants vs. seedling, etc.). We also evaluated how carbon-water dynamics mediate plant growth under drought stress. We found that drought stress consistently reduced plant growth, photosynthetic rate, water potentials and the consequent hydraulic conductivity across species. Growth responses were strongly influenced by leaf phenology (evergreen vs. deciduous) and drought intensity. Evergreen species showed greater growth resistance to drought than deciduous species, by maintaining photosynthesis and hydraulic function despite faster declines in water potential. Evergreen species exhibited linear reductions in growth, photosynthesis, and water potentials with increasing drought intensity, reflecting gradual physiological adjustments indicative of drought resistance. In contrast, deciduous species showed significant limitation of photosynthesis and growth at drought onset. Our findings provide a quantitative framework linking plant traits related to carbohydrates and hydraulic to growth responses under drought. Understanding how drought affects carbon-water strategy based on leaf phenology advances predictive vegetation models of responses to climate extremes, with critical implications for ecosystem management and maintaining species diversity under global change scenarios.

常绿物种在干旱条件下表现出更高的生长抗性:来自碳水关系的见解。
在全球气候变化的背景下,更加频繁和极端的干旱对植物多样性和生态系统生产力构成了重大威胁。植物生长受到水力破坏和碳吸收减少的相互作用的制约;然而,这些碳水动力学如何共同调节不同功能类型的生长,特别是在不同干旱强度和持续时间下,仍然知之甚少。我们对不同生物群系中236个物种的249项研究进行了荟萃分析,以研究不同功能群(如常绿植物与落叶植物、被子植物与裸子植物、成年植物与幼苗等)在生长、碳水化合物分配和对干旱的水力响应方面的差异。我们还评估了干旱胁迫下碳水动力学如何调节植物生长。我们发现,干旱胁迫持续降低植物的生长、光合速率、水势和随之而来的跨物种的水力传导率。生长响应受叶片物候(常绿与落叶)和干旱强度的强烈影响。常绿树种在水势下降较快的情况下,通过维持光合作用和水力功能,表现出比落叶树种更强的抗旱性。随着干旱强度的增加,常绿树种的生长、光合作用和水势呈线性下降,反映了抗旱性的逐渐生理调节。相比之下,落叶树种在干旱开始时光合作用和生长表现出明显的限制。我们的研究结果提供了一个定量框架,将与碳水化合物和水力相关的植物性状与干旱下的生长反应联系起来。了解干旱如何影响基于叶片物候的碳水策略,有助于推进极端气候响应的预测植被模型,对全球变化情景下的生态系统管理和物种多样性维持具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tree physiology
Tree physiology 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
7.50%
发文量
133
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Tree Physiology promotes research in a framework of hierarchically organized systems, measuring insight by the ability to link adjacent layers: thus, investigated tree physiology phenomenon should seek mechanistic explanation in finer-scale phenomena as well as seek significance in larger scale phenomena (Passioura 1979). A phenomenon not linked downscale is merely descriptive; an observation not linked upscale, might be trivial. Physiologists often refer qualitatively to processes at finer or coarser scale than the scale of their observation, and studies formally directed at three, or even two adjacent scales are rare. To emphasize the importance of relating mechanisms to coarser scale function, Tree Physiology will highlight papers doing so particularly well as feature papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信