Does wire-guided cystotome dilation for difficult benign bilio-pancreatic strictures guarantee long-term patency? A narrative mini-review of the literature.

IF 1.8 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Omar Ksissa, Lorenzo Dioscoridi, Edoardo Forti, Francesco Pugliese, Marcello Cintolo, Andrea Palermo, Massimiliano Mutignani
{"title":"Does wire-guided cystotome dilation for difficult benign bilio-pancreatic strictures guarantee long-term patency? A narrative mini-review of the literature.","authors":"Omar Ksissa, Lorenzo Dioscoridi, Edoardo Forti, Francesco Pugliese, Marcello Cintolo, Andrea Palermo, Massimiliano Mutignani","doi":"10.4253/wjge.v17.i9.106936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Difficult benign biliary and pancreatic strictures are generally managed by using a Soehendra screw or cystotome. Many previous studies described the techniques without information even of mid-term follow-up.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To confirm the long-term patency of dilated strictures following the application of a cystotome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from analysis of the literature using appropriate key words. Technical success was defined as the ability to traverse the stricture. Clinical success was defined as drainage of biliary or pancreatic strictures and symptoms' resolution. PRISMA criteria were followed to write the present review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three papers were selected following the inclusion criteria. Our case series was added to the review of the literature. Reported technical and clinical success rates were 100% in all the studies and the rate of adverse events was reported from 9.1% to 60%. However, data on follow-up and long-term patency are scant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of a cystotome can be considered an alternative method for dilation of difficult pancreatic and biliary strictures, after the failure of conventional modalities. According to available literature, long-term results are rarely described, and this is still a crucial issue to evaluate the effectiveness of the technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":23953,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"17 9","pages":"106936"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12444293/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v17.i9.106936","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Difficult benign biliary and pancreatic strictures are generally managed by using a Soehendra screw or cystotome. Many previous studies described the techniques without information even of mid-term follow-up.

Aim: To confirm the long-term patency of dilated strictures following the application of a cystotome.

Methods: Data were collected from analysis of the literature using appropriate key words. Technical success was defined as the ability to traverse the stricture. Clinical success was defined as drainage of biliary or pancreatic strictures and symptoms' resolution. PRISMA criteria were followed to write the present review.

Results: Three papers were selected following the inclusion criteria. Our case series was added to the review of the literature. Reported technical and clinical success rates were 100% in all the studies and the rate of adverse events was reported from 9.1% to 60%. However, data on follow-up and long-term patency are scant.

Conclusion: The use of a cystotome can be considered an alternative method for dilation of difficult pancreatic and biliary strictures, after the failure of conventional modalities. According to available literature, long-term results are rarely described, and this is still a crucial issue to evaluate the effectiveness of the technique.

导线引导下膀胱切开扩张治疗难治性良性胆胰狭窄能保证长期通畅吗?一篇叙事性的文献综述。
背景:难治的良性胆道和胰腺狭窄通常采用索亨德拉螺钉或膀胱切开术治疗。许多先前的研究描述了这些技术,甚至没有提供中期随访的信息。目的:探讨膀胱切开术后扩张性狭窄的长期通畅性。方法:采用合适的关键词进行文献分析,收集资料。技术上的成功被定义为穿越结构的能力。临床成功的定义是胆道或胰腺狭窄的引流和症状的缓解。遵循PRISMA标准撰写本综述。结果:按照纳入标准筛选出3篇论文。我们的病例系列被添加到文献综述中。所有研究报告的技术和临床成功率均为100%,不良事件发生率从9.1%报道到60%。然而,关于随访和长期通畅的数据很少。结论:在常规方法失败后,使用膀胱切开术可以被认为是扩张困难的胰腺和胆道狭窄的一种替代方法。根据现有文献,很少描述长期结果,这仍然是评估该技术有效性的关键问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
5.00%
发文量
1164
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信