{"title":"Early precut is useful for difficult bile duct cannulation, particularly in cases with long oral protrusion.","authors":"Toru Kaneko, Mitsuhiro Kida, Takahiro Kurosu, Gen Kitahara, Tomohiro Betto, Yutaro Saito, Shiori Koyama, Nao Nomura, Chika Kusano","doi":"10.4253/wjge.v17.i9.108420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography involves selective bile duct cannulation, which is often challenging and associated with complications. In difficult cannulation cases, early precutting is frequently used. However, its efficacy and optimal indications require further evaluation.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of early precut (EP) in difficult bile duct cannulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures was performed for bile duct cannulation in patients with naive papillae who required advanced cannulation techniques (ACTs). These patients were admitted between April 2020 and March 2024 and were analyzed for risk factors, success rates, and complications. Outcomes were compared between the EP group and the conventional other ACTs group, with a focus on cases with oral protrusion large (oral protrusion-L).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The need for ACTs was identified as an independent risk factor for complications [odds ratio (OR) = 5.4; 95% confidence interval: 1.887-15.53]. Malignant biliary strictures (OR = 2.58) and oral protrusion-L (OR = 2.77) were also identified as independent risk factors for requiring ACTs. The EP group had a significantly higher second-line cannulation success rate (97.9% <i>vs</i> 73.2%, <i>P</i> = 0.001) and lower complication rate (8.3% <i>vs</i> 39.0%, <i>P</i> = 0.001) than the other ACTs group. Additionally, similar benefits were observed in the oral protrusion-L cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides compelling evidence that EP is a viable alternative and a superior strategy in cases requiring ACTs, particularly oral protrusion-L.</p>","PeriodicalId":23953,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"17 9","pages":"108420"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12444251/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v17.i9.108420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography involves selective bile duct cannulation, which is often challenging and associated with complications. In difficult cannulation cases, early precutting is frequently used. However, its efficacy and optimal indications require further evaluation.
Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of early precut (EP) in difficult bile duct cannulation.
Methods: This retrospective analysis of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures was performed for bile duct cannulation in patients with naive papillae who required advanced cannulation techniques (ACTs). These patients were admitted between April 2020 and March 2024 and were analyzed for risk factors, success rates, and complications. Outcomes were compared between the EP group and the conventional other ACTs group, with a focus on cases with oral protrusion large (oral protrusion-L).
Results: The need for ACTs was identified as an independent risk factor for complications [odds ratio (OR) = 5.4; 95% confidence interval: 1.887-15.53]. Malignant biliary strictures (OR = 2.58) and oral protrusion-L (OR = 2.77) were also identified as independent risk factors for requiring ACTs. The EP group had a significantly higher second-line cannulation success rate (97.9% vs 73.2%, P = 0.001) and lower complication rate (8.3% vs 39.0%, P = 0.001) than the other ACTs group. Additionally, similar benefits were observed in the oral protrusion-L cases.
Conclusion: This study provides compelling evidence that EP is a viable alternative and a superior strategy in cases requiring ACTs, particularly oral protrusion-L.
背景:内镜逆行胆管造影涉及选择性胆管插管,这通常具有挑战性并伴有并发症。在插管困难的情况下,经常使用早期预切。然而,其疗效和最佳适应症需要进一步评价。目的:评价早期预切(EP)在困难胆管插管中的疗效和安全性。方法:回顾性分析内窥镜逆行胆管造影对需要先进插管技术(ACTs)的幼稚乳头状瘤患者的胆管插管。这些患者在2020年4月至2024年3月期间入院,并分析了风险因素、成功率和并发症。比较EP组与常规其他ACTs组的结果,重点是口腔突出(口腔突出- l)的病例。结果:需要ACTs被确定为并发症的独立危险因素[优势比(OR) = 5.4;95%置信区间:1.887-15.53]。恶性胆道狭窄(OR = 2.58)和口腔前凸- l (OR = 2.77)也被确定为需要act的独立危险因素。EP组二线插管成功率(97.9% vs 73.2%, P = 0.001)显著高于其他ACTs组,并发症发生率(8.3% vs 39.0%, P = 0.001)显著低于其他ACTs组。此外,在l型口腔前突病例中也观察到类似的益处。结论:本研究提供了令人信服的证据,表明EP是一种可行的替代方案,也是需要act的病例的优越策略,特别是口腔前伸- l。