Assessing a community health center-driven process for engaging with translational scientists: What will it take?

IF 2 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2025-06-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1017/cts.2025.10058
Tracy A Battaglia, Kareem I King, Allyson Richmond, Erika Christenson, Rebecca Lobb, Astraea Augsberger, Celia Bora, Stephen M Tringale, Linda Sprague Martinez, Charles T Williams
{"title":"Assessing a community health center-driven process for engaging with translational scientists: What will it take?","authors":"Tracy A Battaglia, Kareem I King, Allyson Richmond, Erika Christenson, Rebecca Lobb, Astraea Augsberger, Celia Bora, Stephen M Tringale, Linda Sprague Martinez, Charles T Williams","doi":"10.1017/cts.2025.10058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Actively engaging community health centers (CHCs) in research is necessary to ensure evidence-based practices are relevant to all communities and get us closer to closing the health equity gap. We report here on the Boston HealthNet Research Collaborative, a partnership between health centers, Boston HealthNet and the Boston University Clinical, and Translational Science Institute with the explicit goal of supporting research partnerships early in the planning phase of the study lifecycle. We used the principles of community engagement guided by a collective impact framework to codesign, pilot, and evaluate a process for facilitating research partnerships. Accomplishments in the first 2 years include a web-based Toolkit with a step-by-step guide and an active learning collaborative with health center representatives to support research capacity building. The process resulted in 81 new research project partnerships across 50 individual research projects. Most research partnership requests were made later in the research lifecycle, after the planning phase. Partnership acceptance was largely driven by the Collaborative's pre-defined <i>Guiding Principles</i> and <i>Rules of Engagement.</i> These lessons drive an iterative process to improve the longitudinal relationship between our translational research program and our CHC partners.</p>","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"9 1","pages":"e177"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12444707/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2025.10058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Actively engaging community health centers (CHCs) in research is necessary to ensure evidence-based practices are relevant to all communities and get us closer to closing the health equity gap. We report here on the Boston HealthNet Research Collaborative, a partnership between health centers, Boston HealthNet and the Boston University Clinical, and Translational Science Institute with the explicit goal of supporting research partnerships early in the planning phase of the study lifecycle. We used the principles of community engagement guided by a collective impact framework to codesign, pilot, and evaluate a process for facilitating research partnerships. Accomplishments in the first 2 years include a web-based Toolkit with a step-by-step guide and an active learning collaborative with health center representatives to support research capacity building. The process resulted in 81 new research project partnerships across 50 individual research projects. Most research partnership requests were made later in the research lifecycle, after the planning phase. Partnership acceptance was largely driven by the Collaborative's pre-defined Guiding Principles and Rules of Engagement. These lessons drive an iterative process to improve the longitudinal relationship between our translational research program and our CHC partners.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

评估社区卫生中心驱动的与转化科学家合作的过程:需要做些什么?
积极让社区卫生中心(CHCs)参与研究是必要的,以确保循证实践与所有社区相关,并使我们更接近缩小卫生公平差距。我们在此报道波士顿健康网研究合作项目,这是健康中心、波士顿健康网和波士顿大学临床和转化科学研究所之间的合作伙伴关系,其明确目标是在研究生命周期的规划阶段早期支持研究伙伴关系。我们利用集体影响框架指导下的社区参与原则,共同设计、试点和评估促进研究伙伴关系的过程。前两年的成就包括一个基于网络的工具包,其中包含一个循序渐进的指南,并与卫生中心代表开展了积极的学习合作,以支持研究能力建设。这个过程产生了81个新的研究项目伙伴关系,涉及50个单独的研究项目。大多数研究伙伴关系请求是在研究生命周期的后期,即计划阶段之后提出的。伙伴关系的接受很大程度上是由协作组织预先定义的指导原则和参与规则驱动的。这些经验教训推动了一个迭代过程,以改善我们的转化研究项目和我们的CHC合作伙伴之间的纵向关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
26.90%
发文量
437
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信