Switch It Off! Carbon, Financial and Health Service Impacts of Switching Off a Computed Tomography Scanner: A Quality Improvement Study.

IF 2 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Nicholas Marks, Mya Abigail Acosta, Kristen Pickles, Scott McAlister, Katy J L Bell
{"title":"Switch It Off! Carbon, Financial and Health Service Impacts of Switching Off a Computed Tomography Scanner: A Quality Improvement Study.","authors":"Nicholas Marks, Mya Abigail Acosta, Kristen Pickles, Scott McAlister, Katy J L Bell","doi":"10.1002/jmrs.896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Medical imaging has been identified as a carbon hotspot in health care, and demand for imaging services is increasing. This study investigated switching off a surplus computerised tomography (CT) scanner when not clinically required as a possible simple and scalable intervention to reduce healthcare emissions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This before-after quality improvement study introduced a 'Switch it off' intervention where radiography staff switched off the power to a surplus CT scanner after hours (17:00-08:00) for 7 days ('intervention period': 07/7/2023-13/07/2023). Using a power data logger, power consumption (kilowatt hours, KWh) during the intervention period was compared to 7 days without the switch-off practice ('control period': 24/07/2023-31/07/2023). Financial and carbon emission impacts were calculated based on energy consumption. All CT radiographers working in the department were invited to undertake a pre and post intervention survey. Differences in quantitative data pre- and postintervention were analysed using chi-squared test for independent proportions. Free text survey responses were summarised into themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with energy use in the control period (433.96 kWh), there was a reduction in 139.79 kWh during the intervention period (294.17 kWh): 32% relative reduction. Extrapolation to 12 months found potential savings of 7280 kWh in energy use, $1381 to the hospital budget, and 5.5 T CO<sub>2</sub>e to the carbon budget. Of the 22 CT radiographers invited, 10 (45%) completed the survey, reporting no or trivial clinical impacts from switching off. The proportion of radiographers reporting switching off the scanner when not in use increased by 70% (95% CI: 39%, 100%; p = 0.002) from 10% (1/10) pre- to 80% (8/10) postintervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Identifying and switching off surplus CT scanners in low use times is a simple and scalable intervention that can achieve significant power, financial and carbon savings with little to no impact on clinical workflow.</p>","PeriodicalId":16382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Medical imaging has been identified as a carbon hotspot in health care, and demand for imaging services is increasing. This study investigated switching off a surplus computerised tomography (CT) scanner when not clinically required as a possible simple and scalable intervention to reduce healthcare emissions.

Methods: This before-after quality improvement study introduced a 'Switch it off' intervention where radiography staff switched off the power to a surplus CT scanner after hours (17:00-08:00) for 7 days ('intervention period': 07/7/2023-13/07/2023). Using a power data logger, power consumption (kilowatt hours, KWh) during the intervention period was compared to 7 days without the switch-off practice ('control period': 24/07/2023-31/07/2023). Financial and carbon emission impacts were calculated based on energy consumption. All CT radiographers working in the department were invited to undertake a pre and post intervention survey. Differences in quantitative data pre- and postintervention were analysed using chi-squared test for independent proportions. Free text survey responses were summarised into themes.

Results: Compared with energy use in the control period (433.96 kWh), there was a reduction in 139.79 kWh during the intervention period (294.17 kWh): 32% relative reduction. Extrapolation to 12 months found potential savings of 7280 kWh in energy use, $1381 to the hospital budget, and 5.5 T CO2e to the carbon budget. Of the 22 CT radiographers invited, 10 (45%) completed the survey, reporting no or trivial clinical impacts from switching off. The proportion of radiographers reporting switching off the scanner when not in use increased by 70% (95% CI: 39%, 100%; p = 0.002) from 10% (1/10) pre- to 80% (8/10) postintervention.

Conclusion: Identifying and switching off surplus CT scanners in low use times is a simple and scalable intervention that can achieve significant power, financial and carbon savings with little to no impact on clinical workflow.

关掉它!碳,金融和健康服务的影响关闭计算机断层扫描:质量改进研究。
医学成像已被确定为卫生保健领域的碳热点,对成像服务的需求正在增加。本研究调查了当临床不需要时关闭多余的计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描仪,作为一种可能的简单且可扩展的干预措施,以减少医疗保健排放。方法:这项前后质量改善研究引入了一种“关闭”干预措施,即放射工作人员在工作后(17:00-08:00)关闭一台多余CT扫描仪的电源,持续7天(“干预期”:2023年7月7日- 2023年7月13日)。使用电力数据记录仪,将干预期间的电力消耗(千瓦时,KWh)与没有关闭实践的7天(“控制期”:2023年7月24日- 2023年7月31日)进行比较。金融和碳排放影响是根据能源消耗计算的。所有在该科工作的CT放射技师被邀请进行介入治疗前后的调查。采用独立比例卡方检验分析干预前后定量数据的差异。自由文本调查的回答被总结成主题。结果:与对照期(433.96 kWh)能耗相比,干预期(294.17 kWh)能耗减少139.79 kWh,相对减少32%。根据12个月的推算,可以节省7280千瓦时的能源使用,为医院预算节省1381美元,并为碳预算节省5.5吨二氧化碳当量。在获邀的22名CT放射技师中,有10名(45%)完成了调查,并表示没有或只有轻微的临床影响。报告在不使用时关闭扫描仪的放射技师比例从干预前的10%(1/10)增加到干预后的80%(8/10),增加了70% (95% CI: 39%, 100%; p = 0.002)。结论:识别和关闭低使用时间的多余CT扫描仪是一种简单且可扩展的干预措施,可以实现显著的电力、经济和碳节约,而对临床工作流程几乎没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
69
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences (JMRS) is an international and multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal that accepts manuscripts related to medical imaging / diagnostic radiography, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine, medical ultrasound / sonography, and the complementary disciplines of medical physics, radiology, radiation oncology, nursing, psychology and sociology. Manuscripts may take the form of: original articles, review articles, commentary articles, technical evaluations, case series and case studies. JMRS promotes excellence in international medical radiation science by the publication of contemporary and advanced research that encourages the adoption of the best clinical, scientific and educational practices in international communities. JMRS is the official professional journal of the Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy (ASMIRT) and the New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology (NZIMRT).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信