Design, implementation, and comprehensive evaluation of the specialized teachings of health information technology students.

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Journal of Education and Health Promotion Pub Date : 2025-08-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_339_24
Mohammad Hosein Hayavi-Haghighi, Zahra Mastaneh, Farid Khorrami, Mehraban Shahi, Nasrin Davaridolatabadi
{"title":"Design, implementation, and comprehensive evaluation of the specialized teachings of health information technology students.","authors":"Mohammad Hosein Hayavi-Haghighi, Zahra Mastaneh, Farid Khorrami, Mehraban Shahi, Nasrin Davaridolatabadi","doi":"10.4103/jehp.jehp_339_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is an increasing need for a comprehensive assessment method to assess the various essential skills of Health Information Technology (HIT) students. This study aims to design, implement, and evaluate a holistic assessment method for HIT students.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study was carried out in three phases. During the design phase, the expected competencies for professional roles were identified through the brainstorming sessions. In the implementation phase, the appropriate assessment method [project-based, objective structured practical evaluation (OSPE), multiple choice questions (MCQs), and real environment observation] was considered for each competency. In the assessment phase, the opinions of the stakeholders regarding the four-stage assessment were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen competencies of HIT graduates and their assessment methods were identified in three main areas: health information management, IT, and research. Students' competencies were then assessed in two consecutive years (2022 and 2023). In the second period, students' scores increased in competencies assessed as project-based, OSPE, and observation in the real environment and decreased in MCQs. The students' views on the new comprehensive assessment method were also investigated based on four criteria. The mean scores for satisfaction, usefulness, and motivation increased among the students of the second course, while the mean score for stressors decreased.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the amount of time and energy that has gone for this method, the cost-effectiveness of the method has been recognized by the process designers. By repeating this method over the next years, students' adherence to this style will increase and, in addition to reducing stress, they will improve their performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":15581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","volume":"14 ","pages":"321"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12448549/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_339_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is an increasing need for a comprehensive assessment method to assess the various essential skills of Health Information Technology (HIT) students. This study aims to design, implement, and evaluate a holistic assessment method for HIT students.

Materials and methods: This study was carried out in three phases. During the design phase, the expected competencies for professional roles were identified through the brainstorming sessions. In the implementation phase, the appropriate assessment method [project-based, objective structured practical evaluation (OSPE), multiple choice questions (MCQs), and real environment observation] was considered for each competency. In the assessment phase, the opinions of the stakeholders regarding the four-stage assessment were evaluated.

Results: Thirteen competencies of HIT graduates and their assessment methods were identified in three main areas: health information management, IT, and research. Students' competencies were then assessed in two consecutive years (2022 and 2023). In the second period, students' scores increased in competencies assessed as project-based, OSPE, and observation in the real environment and decreased in MCQs. The students' views on the new comprehensive assessment method were also investigated based on four criteria. The mean scores for satisfaction, usefulness, and motivation increased among the students of the second course, while the mean score for stressors decreased.

Conclusion: Despite the amount of time and energy that has gone for this method, the cost-effectiveness of the method has been recognized by the process designers. By repeating this method over the next years, students' adherence to this style will increase and, in addition to reducing stress, they will improve their performance.

Abstract Image

卫生信息技术专业教学的设计、实施与综合评价。
背景:越来越需要一种综合的评估方法来评估卫生信息技术(HIT)学生的各种基本技能。本研究旨在设计、实施及评估一套针对哈工大学生的整体评估方法。材料与方法:本研究分三期进行。在设计阶段,通过头脑风暴会议确定了专业角色的预期能力。在实施阶段,对每个能力都考虑了适当的评估方法[基于项目、客观结构化实践评估(OSPE)、选择题(mcq)和真实环境观察]。在评估阶段,评估利益相关者对四阶段评估的意见。结果:在卫生信息管理、信息技术和研究三个主要领域确定了哈工大毕业生的13项能力及其评估方法。然后连续两年(2022年和2023年)对学生的能力进行评估。在第二阶段,学生在基于项目的能力、spe能力和在真实环境中的观察能力方面的得分有所提高,而在mcq方面的得分有所下降。学生对新的综合评价方法的看法也基于四个标准进行了调查。第二门课程的学生满意度、有用性和动机的平均得分增加,而压力源的平均得分下降。结论:尽管该方法花费了大量的时间和精力,但该方法的成本效益已得到工艺设计者的认可。通过在接下来的几年里重复这种方法,学生们对这种风格的坚持将会增加,除了减少压力外,他们还会提高他们的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
218
审稿时长
34 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信