Exploring grant writing coaching and its role in professional development of health equity investigators: A qualitative study.

IF 2 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2025-07-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1017/cts.2025.10080
Yulia A Levites Strekalova, Selin Kavak, Vanessa Caridad Rodriguez, Sara Midence, Lee S Caplan, Winston Thompson, Muhammed Y Idris, Jonathan Stiles, Priscilla Pemu, Alexander Quarshie, Adriana Baez, Maritza Salazar Campo, Elizabeth Ofili
{"title":"Exploring grant writing coaching and its role in professional development of health equity investigators: A qualitative study.","authors":"Yulia A Levites Strekalova, Selin Kavak, Vanessa Caridad Rodriguez, Sara Midence, Lee S Caplan, Winston Thompson, Muhammed Y Idris, Jonathan Stiles, Priscilla Pemu, Alexander Quarshie, Adriana Baez, Maritza Salazar Campo, Elizabeth Ofili","doi":"10.1017/cts.2025.10080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>External funding is a critical metric in research career advancement, particularly in biomedical fields. Grant-writing coaching emerges as a strategy in biomedical workforce development. Recognizing disparities in grant success among early-career investigators from underrepresented groups, the National Research Mentoring Network Strategic Empowerment Tailored for Health Equity Investigators (NRMN-SETH) provides grant-writing coaching to support these scholars. This study explores the roles of NRMN-SETH grant-writing coaches in fostering technical skills and social support in a group setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study employed semi-structured interviews with 16 NIH-funded investigators who served as coaches within the NRMN-SETH program. Data were transcribed, coded, and analyzed using the Framework Method, identifying key roles related to coaching practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings reveal that grant-writing coaching involved personalized guidance, confidence-building, and structured group interactions. Coaches emphasized individualized feedback on grant components and provided iterative guidance. The group-based coaching environment fostered peer support and normalized challenges, creating a collaborative atmosphere conducive to skill-building. Coaches noted the importance of institutional support in enabling participants to engage in the program, though challenges arose in managing participants with varying grant-writing experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the potential of grant-writing coaching to enhance research capacity among underrepresented scholars, offering a structured, supportive approach that complements traditional mentorship. Integrating tailored coaching programs within biomedical workforce development, particularly at minority-serving and low-resourced institutions, may reduce disparities in grant success. Future research could expand on these findings by investigating the long-term career impacts of coaching and testing the effectiveness of peer-led, group-based components in grant-writing success.</p>","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"9 1","pages":"e178"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12444689/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2025.10080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: External funding is a critical metric in research career advancement, particularly in biomedical fields. Grant-writing coaching emerges as a strategy in biomedical workforce development. Recognizing disparities in grant success among early-career investigators from underrepresented groups, the National Research Mentoring Network Strategic Empowerment Tailored for Health Equity Investigators (NRMN-SETH) provides grant-writing coaching to support these scholars. This study explores the roles of NRMN-SETH grant-writing coaches in fostering technical skills and social support in a group setting.

Methods: This qualitative study employed semi-structured interviews with 16 NIH-funded investigators who served as coaches within the NRMN-SETH program. Data were transcribed, coded, and analyzed using the Framework Method, identifying key roles related to coaching practices.

Results: Findings reveal that grant-writing coaching involved personalized guidance, confidence-building, and structured group interactions. Coaches emphasized individualized feedback on grant components and provided iterative guidance. The group-based coaching environment fostered peer support and normalized challenges, creating a collaborative atmosphere conducive to skill-building. Coaches noted the importance of institutional support in enabling participants to engage in the program, though challenges arose in managing participants with varying grant-writing experience.

Conclusions: This study highlights the potential of grant-writing coaching to enhance research capacity among underrepresented scholars, offering a structured, supportive approach that complements traditional mentorship. Integrating tailored coaching programs within biomedical workforce development, particularly at minority-serving and low-resourced institutions, may reduce disparities in grant success. Future research could expand on these findings by investigating the long-term career impacts of coaching and testing the effectiveness of peer-led, group-based components in grant-writing success.

Abstract Image

探索拨款写作辅导及其在健康公平调查员专业发展中的作用:一项质性研究。
引言:外部资助是研究事业发展的关键指标,特别是在生物医学领域。资助写作指导是生物医学劳动力发展的一种策略。认识到来自代表性不足群体的早期职业研究人员在资助成功方面的差异,国家研究指导网络为健康公平调查人员量身定制的战略赋权(NRMN-SETH)提供资助写作指导,以支持这些学者。本研究探讨了NRMN-SETH资助写作教练在培养技术技能和团体社会支持方面的作用。方法:本定性研究采用半结构化访谈与16名美国国立卫生研究院资助的调查员,他们在NRMN-SETH项目中担任教练。使用框架方法对数据进行转录、编码和分析,确定与教练实践相关的关键角色。结果:研究结果表明,基金写作指导包括个性化指导、建立信任和结构化的小组互动。教练员强调对赠款组成部分的个性化反馈,并提供迭代指导。以团队为基础的教练环境促进了同伴的支持和规范化的挑战,创造了一种有利于技能培养的合作氛围。教练们指出,机构支持对于让参与者参与该项目的重要性,尽管在管理具有不同资助写作经验的参与者方面出现了挑战。结论:本研究强调了资助写作指导在提高代表性不足的学者的研究能力方面的潜力,提供了一种结构化的、支持性的方法,补充了传统的指导。在生物医学劳动力发展中整合量身定制的培训计划,特别是在少数民族服务和资源匮乏的机构中,可能会减少拨款成功的差异。未来的研究可以通过调查指导对职业生涯的长期影响,以及测试同伴主导的、以团队为基础的因素对成功撰写拨款的有效性,来扩展这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
26.90%
发文量
437
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信