Midwifery students' perceptions of factors influencing their clinical feedback in educational clinical environment: A qualitative study.

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Journal of Education and Health Promotion Pub Date : 2025-08-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_1986_23
Soheila Mohamadirizi, Zohreh Abbasi, Elham Shirdel, Sakineh Nazari
{"title":"Midwifery students' perceptions of factors influencing their clinical feedback in educational clinical environment: A qualitative study.","authors":"Soheila Mohamadirizi, Zohreh Abbasi, Elham Shirdel, Sakineh Nazari","doi":"10.4103/jehp.jehp_1986_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Feedback in bedside education poses numerous challenges and complexities, particularly in stressful environments such as the labor and delivery ward, where it can significantly impact the quality of learning and maternal and neonatal health. This study aims to explore the experiences of Midwifery students regarding clinical feedback in the labor and delivery ward.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A qualitative study was conducted, utilizing content analysis to analyze data obtained through interviews with 18 midwifery students. Participants were selected using purposive sampling. Data collection involved semi-structured and in-depth individual interviews, continuing until data saturation was achieved. Data analysis was performed, resulting in the extraction of main categories and subcategories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The qualitative study yielded two main categories and nine subcategories. The main categories consisted of constructive feedback, encompassing subcategories such as teacher qualifications, teacher personality, consideration of student traits, appropriate feedback, physical presence of the teacher, and positive feedback from others. The second main category was destructive feedback, which included subcategories such as negative feedback from others and inappropriate feedback during delivery, as well as the perception of inappropriate teacher behavior from the students' point of view.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study highlight the importance of multidimensional clinical feedback in the learning processes of midwifery students. Constructive feedback was perceived as a key factor in enhancing learning, whereas destructive feedback was found to diminish the quality of learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":15581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","volume":"14 ","pages":"333"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12448551/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1986_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Feedback in bedside education poses numerous challenges and complexities, particularly in stressful environments such as the labor and delivery ward, where it can significantly impact the quality of learning and maternal and neonatal health. This study aims to explore the experiences of Midwifery students regarding clinical feedback in the labor and delivery ward.

Material and methods: A qualitative study was conducted, utilizing content analysis to analyze data obtained through interviews with 18 midwifery students. Participants were selected using purposive sampling. Data collection involved semi-structured and in-depth individual interviews, continuing until data saturation was achieved. Data analysis was performed, resulting in the extraction of main categories and subcategories.

Results: The qualitative study yielded two main categories and nine subcategories. The main categories consisted of constructive feedback, encompassing subcategories such as teacher qualifications, teacher personality, consideration of student traits, appropriate feedback, physical presence of the teacher, and positive feedback from others. The second main category was destructive feedback, which included subcategories such as negative feedback from others and inappropriate feedback during delivery, as well as the perception of inappropriate teacher behavior from the students' point of view.

Conclusion: The findings of this study highlight the importance of multidimensional clinical feedback in the learning processes of midwifery students. Constructive feedback was perceived as a key factor in enhancing learning, whereas destructive feedback was found to diminish the quality of learning.

助产学学生对教育临床环境中影响其临床反馈因素的认知:一项质性研究。
背景:床边教育中的反馈带来了许多挑战和复杂性,特别是在紧张的环境中,如产房和分娩病房,它可以显著影响学习质量和孕产妇和新生儿健康。本研究旨在探讨助产学学生在产房的临床反馈经验。材料与方法:采用质性研究,采用内容分析法对18名助产学学生的访谈数据进行分析。参与者的选择采用有目的的抽样。数据收集包括半结构化和深入的个人访谈,一直持续到数据饱和。进行数据分析,提取主要类别和子类别。结果:定性研究产生了两个主要类别和九个小类别。主要类别包括建设性反馈,包括教师资格、教师个性、对学生特征的考虑、适当的反馈、教师的实际存在以及来自他人的积极反馈等子类别。第二个主要类别是破坏性反馈,其中包括来自他人的负面反馈和传递过程中的不适当反馈,以及学生对教师不适当行为的看法等子类别。结论:本研究结果强调了多维临床反馈在助产学学生学习过程中的重要性。建设性反馈被认为是提高学习的关键因素,而破坏性反馈则会降低学习质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
218
审稿时长
34 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信