Influence of relative strength on the optimal load of the hang power clean and hang high pull in collegiate athletes.

IF 2.6 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living Pub Date : 2025-09-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fspor.2025.1597535
Yongmin Xie, Xingyu Pan, Fan Peng, Qinchang Sun
{"title":"Influence of relative strength on the optimal load of the hang power clean and hang high pull in collegiate athletes.","authors":"Yongmin Xie, Xingyu Pan, Fan Peng, Qinchang Sun","doi":"10.3389/fspor.2025.1597535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although training load is a critical determinant of adequate training stimuli for athletes, the optimal load for power training varies across individuals, and the underlying factors contributing to this variability remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated the influence of relative strength on optimal load during the execution of the hang power clean (HPC) and hang high pull (HHP) among college athletes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 30 male college athletes (mean ± standard deviation age, 21.8 ± 2.3 years) performed hang power cleans (HPCs) and hang high pulls (HHPs) on a three-dimensional force plate at loads corresponding to 45%, 65%, 80%, and 95% of their one-repetition maximum (1RM), presented in a randomized and counterbalanced order. The relationship between optimal load and relative strength was assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The optimal load for achieving maximum output power in the hang high pull (HPP) and hang power clean (HPC) exhibited a highly individualized characteristic.A significant positive correlation was found between athlete strength and optimal load for both the HPC (<i>r</i> = 0.478, <i>P</i> < .01) and HHP (<i>r</i> = 0.611, <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A positive correlation between optimal load and the relative strength of the athlete for the HPC and the HHP indicated that as the athlete's strength increased, the load intensity should be appropriately increased to maintain efficient training stimulation to elicit maximum power for each athlete. However, this study did not examine female collegiate athletes and other athletic populations. coaches should be discreetly when applying this conclusion to these athletic groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":12716,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","volume":"7 ","pages":"1597535"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12446339/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2025.1597535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although training load is a critical determinant of adequate training stimuli for athletes, the optimal load for power training varies across individuals, and the underlying factors contributing to this variability remain unclear.

Objective: This study investigated the influence of relative strength on optimal load during the execution of the hang power clean (HPC) and hang high pull (HHP) among college athletes.

Methods: A total of 30 male college athletes (mean ± standard deviation age, 21.8 ± 2.3 years) performed hang power cleans (HPCs) and hang high pulls (HHPs) on a three-dimensional force plate at loads corresponding to 45%, 65%, 80%, and 95% of their one-repetition maximum (1RM), presented in a randomized and counterbalanced order. The relationship between optimal load and relative strength was assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficient.

Results: The optimal load for achieving maximum output power in the hang high pull (HPP) and hang power clean (HPC) exhibited a highly individualized characteristic.A significant positive correlation was found between athlete strength and optimal load for both the HPC (r = 0.478, P < .01) and HHP (r = 0.611, P < .001).

Conclusions: A positive correlation between optimal load and the relative strength of the athlete for the HPC and the HHP indicated that as the athlete's strength increased, the load intensity should be appropriately increased to maintain efficient training stimulation to elicit maximum power for each athlete. However, this study did not examine female collegiate athletes and other athletic populations. coaches should be discreetly when applying this conclusion to these athletic groups.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

相对力量对大学生运动员悬空发力和悬空高拉最佳负荷的影响。
背景:虽然训练负荷是决定运动员是否有足够的训练刺激的关键因素,但力量训练的最佳负荷因人而异,造成这种差异的潜在因素尚不清楚。目的:研究相对力量对大学生运动员悬吊力清洁(HPC)和悬吊高拉(HHP)最佳负荷的影响。方法:30名男性大学生运动员(平均±标准差年龄,21.8±2.3岁)在三维力板上分别以其单次重复最大值(1RM)的45%、65%、80%和95%的负荷进行吊力清洁(HPCs)和吊高拉(HHPs),随机和平衡排列。采用Pearson相关系数评价最佳荷载与相对强度之间的关系。结果:悬垂高拉(HPP)和悬垂力清洁(HPC)中获得最大输出功率的最佳负荷表现出高度个性化的特征。运动员力量与HPC最优负荷之间存在显著正相关(r = 0.478, P = 0.611, P)。结论:HPC和HHP最优负荷与运动员相对力量呈正相关,说明随着运动员力量的增加,应适当增加负荷强度,以保持有效的训练刺激,使运动员获得最大功率。然而,这项研究没有调查女大学运动员和其他运动人群。教练在将这一结论应用于这些运动群体时应该谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
459
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信