State of the Art on Vaccine Development Against Dengue Infection: Scoping Review of the Literature.

IF 2.4 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Davide Marangoni, Anna Barbiero, Michele Spinicci, Alessandro Bartoloni, Andrea Rossanese, Paolo Bonanni, Lorenzo Zammarchi
{"title":"State of the Art on Vaccine Development Against Dengue Infection: Scoping Review of the Literature.","authors":"Davide Marangoni, Anna Barbiero, Michele Spinicci, Alessandro Bartoloni, Andrea Rossanese, Paolo Bonanni, Lorenzo Zammarchi","doi":"10.3390/idr17050117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Dengue virus infection is a significant challenge for global health, with 100 million symptomatic cases, 2.3 million DALYs and 20,000 deaths annually. Dengue vaccines must provide long-lasting immunity against all four virus serotypes, especially in dengue-naïve individuals, in order to avoid the severe manifestations of secondary infections. <b>Methods:</b> This scoping review summarizes current evidence on licensed dengue vaccines and vaccine candidates, focusing on immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety outcomes. To identify relevant trials, in October 2023 we queried ClinicalTrials.gov using the search term \"dengue vaccines\" to identify past and present vaccine candidates; the search was repeated in February 2025. Vaccines were categorized into licensed (CYD-TDV and TAK-003), late-stage (TV003/TV005), and early-stage candidates (TDEN, DPIV, V180, TVDV). <b>Results:</b> CYD-TDV (Dengvaxia<sup>®</sup>) showed moderate efficacy in large trials, with higher efficacy in seropositive than in seronegative individuals. Following commercialization, an increased hospitalization risk was discovered in the latter group. Due to these findings and impossibility of screening for prior exposure in endemic settings newer vaccines are now preferred and CYD-TDV production has recently been discontinued due to declining demand. TAK-003 (Qdenga<sup>®</sup>) demonstrated high efficacy against virologically confirmed dengue (VCD) and dengue-related hospitalization. This vaccine was generally well tolerated and is currently recommended by scientific societies and national authorities for travelers and by WHO for routine use in adults and children in endemic settings. TV003 and TV005, developed by NIAID, showed strong immunogenicity and efficacy in phase II trials and human challenge models. Preliminary results show that a single-dose of TV003 has an efficacy of 79.6% in seronegatives and 89.2% in seropositives against VCD at a 2-year follow-up. Both formulations elicited tetravalent responses with an acceptable safety profile. Other vaccine strategies, including TDEN (live-attenuated), DPIV (purified inactivated), V180 (subunit), and TVDV (DNA-based) are still in early-phase development and suffer from waning antibody titers and limited efficacy in naïve subjects. <b>Conclusions:</b> The development of a safe and effective vaccine remains complex due to immunologic challenges. Currently, TAK-003 is regarded as the best option for broad implementation, while TV003 and TV005 remain promising candidates due to their shorter schedule and robust immunogenicity. Further research is needed to optimize vaccine strategies in seronegative populations, immunocompromised subjects, older adults, and travelers.</p>","PeriodicalId":13579,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Disease Reports","volume":"17 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12452720/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Disease Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/idr17050117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dengue virus infection is a significant challenge for global health, with 100 million symptomatic cases, 2.3 million DALYs and 20,000 deaths annually. Dengue vaccines must provide long-lasting immunity against all four virus serotypes, especially in dengue-naïve individuals, in order to avoid the severe manifestations of secondary infections. Methods: This scoping review summarizes current evidence on licensed dengue vaccines and vaccine candidates, focusing on immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety outcomes. To identify relevant trials, in October 2023 we queried ClinicalTrials.gov using the search term "dengue vaccines" to identify past and present vaccine candidates; the search was repeated in February 2025. Vaccines were categorized into licensed (CYD-TDV and TAK-003), late-stage (TV003/TV005), and early-stage candidates (TDEN, DPIV, V180, TVDV). Results: CYD-TDV (Dengvaxia®) showed moderate efficacy in large trials, with higher efficacy in seropositive than in seronegative individuals. Following commercialization, an increased hospitalization risk was discovered in the latter group. Due to these findings and impossibility of screening for prior exposure in endemic settings newer vaccines are now preferred and CYD-TDV production has recently been discontinued due to declining demand. TAK-003 (Qdenga®) demonstrated high efficacy against virologically confirmed dengue (VCD) and dengue-related hospitalization. This vaccine was generally well tolerated and is currently recommended by scientific societies and national authorities for travelers and by WHO for routine use in adults and children in endemic settings. TV003 and TV005, developed by NIAID, showed strong immunogenicity and efficacy in phase II trials and human challenge models. Preliminary results show that a single-dose of TV003 has an efficacy of 79.6% in seronegatives and 89.2% in seropositives against VCD at a 2-year follow-up. Both formulations elicited tetravalent responses with an acceptable safety profile. Other vaccine strategies, including TDEN (live-attenuated), DPIV (purified inactivated), V180 (subunit), and TVDV (DNA-based) are still in early-phase development and suffer from waning antibody titers and limited efficacy in naïve subjects. Conclusions: The development of a safe and effective vaccine remains complex due to immunologic challenges. Currently, TAK-003 is regarded as the best option for broad implementation, while TV003 and TV005 remain promising candidates due to their shorter schedule and robust immunogenicity. Further research is needed to optimize vaccine strategies in seronegative populations, immunocompromised subjects, older adults, and travelers.

登革热感染疫苗研究现状:文献综述
背景:登革热病毒感染是全球卫生面临的重大挑战,每年有1亿例有症状病例、230万伤残调整生命年和20 000例死亡。登革热疫苗必须提供针对所有四种病毒血清型的持久免疫力,特别是在dengue-naïve个体中,以避免继发感染的严重表现。方法:本综述总结了目前已获许可的登革热疫苗和候选疫苗的证据,重点是免疫原性、有效性和安全性结果。为了确定相关试验,我们于2023年10月使用“登革热疫苗”搜索ClinicalTrials.gov,以确定过去和现在的候选疫苗;在2025年2月再次进行了搜索。疫苗分为许可疫苗(CYD-TDV和TAK-003)、后期疫苗(TV003/TV005)和早期候选疫苗(TDEN、DPIV、V180、TVDV)。结果:CYD-TDV (Dengvaxia®)在大型试验中显示出中等疗效,血清阳性个体的疗效高于血清阴性个体。商业化后,后者的住院风险增加。由于这些发现和不可能在流行环境中筛查先前的暴露,现在首选较新的疫苗,并且由于需求下降,CYD-TDV的生产最近已停止。TAK-003 (Qdenga®)对病毒学确诊的登革热(VCD)和登革热相关住院治疗具有高疗效。这种疫苗通常耐受性良好,目前被科学学会和国家当局推荐用于旅行者,并被世卫组织推荐用于流行环境中成人和儿童的常规使用。由NIAID开发的TV003和TV005在II期试验和人体攻击模型中显示出很强的免疫原性和有效性。初步结果显示,在2年的随访中,单剂量TV003对血清阴性和血清阳性的VCD有效率分别为79.6%和89.2%。这两种配方都能产生四价反应,并具有可接受的安全性。其他疫苗策略,包括TDEN(减毒活疫苗)、DPIV(纯化灭活疫苗)、V180(亚单位疫苗)和TVDV(基于dna的疫苗)仍处于早期开发阶段,在naïve受试者中存在抗体滴度下降和有限效力的问题。结论:由于免疫方面的挑战,开发一种安全有效的疫苗仍然很复杂。目前,TAK-003被认为是广泛实施的最佳选择,而TV003和TV005由于其更短的时间表和强大的免疫原性,仍然是有希望的候选药物。需要进一步研究以优化血清阴性人群、免疫功能低下者、老年人和旅行者的疫苗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infectious Disease Reports
Infectious Disease Reports INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信