Examination of Social Participation in Older Adults Undergoing Frailty Health Checkups Using Deep Learning Models.

IF 2.1 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Yoshiharu Yokokawa, Keisuke Nakamura, Tomohiro Sasaki, Shinobu Yokouchi, Fumikazu Kimura
{"title":"Examination of Social Participation in Older Adults Undergoing Frailty Health Checkups Using Deep Learning Models.","authors":"Yoshiharu Yokokawa, Keisuke Nakamura, Tomohiro Sasaki, Shinobu Yokouchi, Fumikazu Kimura","doi":"10.3390/geriatrics10050124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Frailty in older adults limits social participation. We aimed to predict social participation in older individuals undergoing frailty health checkups using three machine learning (ML) models and identify key predictive factors through deep neural network (DNN) analysis. <b>Methods</b>: Overall, 301 older individuals were enrolled; 295 were included in the final analysis. The survey measured 18 attributes, including demographic, physical, cognitive, and social factors. Logistic regression (LR), nonlinear support vector machine (NLSVM), and DNN were used for prediction, with precision, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, and area under the curve (AUC) calculated as evaluation metrics. <b>Results</b>: Among 295 participants, 236 (80%) engaged in social activities, whereas 59 (20%) did not. The three models demonstrated complementary strengths: DNN provided the most balanced performance with superior sensitivity for detecting social participants; NLSVM showed the best overall discriminative ability but with higher false positive rates; and LR achieved the highest precision for correctly identifying participants but missed detecting social participants. AUC values ranged from 0.776 to 0.795 across models, indicating moderate discriminative performance. Contribution analysis revealed information-collection ability as the strongest predictor of social participation, followed by walking speed and number of cohabitants. <b>Conclusions</b>: ML models achieved moderate discriminative performance for predicting social participation among frailty-screened older adults. The DNN provided the most balanced performance. Each model exhibited distinct characteristics suitable for different screening purposes, with information-collection ability emerging as a key factor. The findings suggest that models must be carefully selected based on specific community health screening objectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":12653,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics","volume":"10 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12452648/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics10050124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Frailty in older adults limits social participation. We aimed to predict social participation in older individuals undergoing frailty health checkups using three machine learning (ML) models and identify key predictive factors through deep neural network (DNN) analysis. Methods: Overall, 301 older individuals were enrolled; 295 were included in the final analysis. The survey measured 18 attributes, including demographic, physical, cognitive, and social factors. Logistic regression (LR), nonlinear support vector machine (NLSVM), and DNN were used for prediction, with precision, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, and area under the curve (AUC) calculated as evaluation metrics. Results: Among 295 participants, 236 (80%) engaged in social activities, whereas 59 (20%) did not. The three models demonstrated complementary strengths: DNN provided the most balanced performance with superior sensitivity for detecting social participants; NLSVM showed the best overall discriminative ability but with higher false positive rates; and LR achieved the highest precision for correctly identifying participants but missed detecting social participants. AUC values ranged from 0.776 to 0.795 across models, indicating moderate discriminative performance. Contribution analysis revealed information-collection ability as the strongest predictor of social participation, followed by walking speed and number of cohabitants. Conclusions: ML models achieved moderate discriminative performance for predicting social participation among frailty-screened older adults. The DNN provided the most balanced performance. Each model exhibited distinct characteristics suitable for different screening purposes, with information-collection ability emerging as a key factor. The findings suggest that models must be carefully selected based on specific community health screening objectives.

使用深度学习模型研究老年人衰弱健康检查的社会参与。
背景/目的:老年人的虚弱限制了他们的社会参与。我们旨在使用三种机器学习(ML)模型预测接受虚弱健康检查的老年人的社会参与,并通过深度神经网络(DNN)分析确定关键预测因素。方法:总共招募了301名老年人;295人被列入最后分析。这项调查测量了18项属性,包括人口、身体、认知和社会因素。采用Logistic回归(LR)、非线性支持向量机(NLSVM)和深度神经网络(DNN)进行预测,计算精密度、准确度、灵敏度、特异性、F1评分和曲线下面积(AUC)作为评价指标。结果:在295名参与者中,236人(80%)从事社会活动,59人(20%)没有。三种模型表现出互补的优势:深度神经网络在检测社会参与者方面提供了最平衡的性能,具有更高的灵敏度;NLSVM整体判别能力最好,但假阳性率较高;LR在正确识别参与者方面达到了最高的精度,但未能识别出社会参与者。各模型的AUC值在0.776 ~ 0.795之间,表明判别性能中等。贡献分析显示,信息收集能力是社会参与的最强预测因子,其次是步行速度和同居人数。结论:ML模型在预测衰弱筛查的老年人的社会参与方面取得了中等的判别性能。DNN提供了最平衡的性能。每个模型都表现出不同的特征,适合不同的筛选目的,其中信息收集能力成为关键因素。研究结果表明,必须根据特定的社区健康筛查目标仔细选择模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geriatrics
Geriatrics 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
20.03 days
期刊介绍: • Geriatric biology • Geriatric health services research • Geriatric medicine research • Geriatric neurology, stroke, cognition and oncology • Geriatric surgery • Geriatric physical functioning, physical health and activity • Geriatric psychiatry and psychology • Geriatric nutrition • Geriatric epidemiology • Geriatric rehabilitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信