Ergonomic Design and Evaluation of Cloth-Pulling Devices for Praewa Silk Weavers .

Q2 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
F1000Research Pub Date : 2025-09-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.12688/f1000research.163622.3
Wuttichai Yota, Manida Swangnetr Neubert, Teeraphun Kaewdok
{"title":"Ergonomic Design and Evaluation of Cloth-Pulling Devices for Praewa Silk Weavers .","authors":"Wuttichai Yota, Manida Swangnetr Neubert, Teeraphun Kaewdok","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.163622.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traditional weaving professionals pull cloth manually during the handloom process, which can lead to several unnoticed musculoskeletal disorders. The aim of this study was to design and evaluate the effectiveness of cloth-pulling devices for Praewa silk weavers in Thailand.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An experimental trial was conducted using surface electromyography to evaluate weavers' muscle activity, productivity and perceived satisfaction during the Praewa silk-pulling process while employing traditional cloth pulling, using a standard cloth-pulling device and using an ergonomic prototype cloth-pulling device.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that the levels of muscle activity and hand activity with the prototype design were generally lower than those with traditional cloth pulling and with the standard cloth-pulling device (p < 0.01). There was a significant preference for the prototype, based on productivity and perceived satisfaction (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The new cloth-pulling device was found to be both applicable and well accepted by the weavers. It is recommended that future research include ergonomic assessments such as muscle activity and fatigue measurements during actual field production to further refine the tool design. Additionally, workstation modifications and improvements to working conditions should be explored to enhance overall ergonomics and worker well-being in the weaving industry Practical implementation of these recommendations may contribute to increased productivity and reduced work-related discomfort among weavers.</p>","PeriodicalId":12260,"journal":{"name":"F1000Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"477"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12449686/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F1000Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.163622.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Traditional weaving professionals pull cloth manually during the handloom process, which can lead to several unnoticed musculoskeletal disorders. The aim of this study was to design and evaluate the effectiveness of cloth-pulling devices for Praewa silk weavers in Thailand.

Methods: An experimental trial was conducted using surface electromyography to evaluate weavers' muscle activity, productivity and perceived satisfaction during the Praewa silk-pulling process while employing traditional cloth pulling, using a standard cloth-pulling device and using an ergonomic prototype cloth-pulling device.

Results: The results showed that the levels of muscle activity and hand activity with the prototype design were generally lower than those with traditional cloth pulling and with the standard cloth-pulling device (p < 0.01). There was a significant preference for the prototype, based on productivity and perceived satisfaction (p < 0.01).

Conclusions: The new cloth-pulling device was found to be both applicable and well accepted by the weavers. It is recommended that future research include ergonomic assessments such as muscle activity and fatigue measurements during actual field production to further refine the tool design. Additionally, workstation modifications and improvements to working conditions should be explored to enhance overall ergonomics and worker well-being in the weaving industry Practical implementation of these recommendations may contribute to increased productivity and reduced work-related discomfort among weavers.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Praewa织丝机拉布装置的人体工程学设计与评价 。
背景:传统的织造专业人员在手工织布过程中手工拉布,这可能导致一些未被注意到的肌肉骨骼疾病。本研究的目的是设计和评估泰国Praewa织丝者的拉布装置的有效性。方法:采用表面肌电图法对Praewa织丝过程中织工的肌肉活动、生产力和感知满意度进行了评估,并对传统的织布、标准的织布装置和人体工程学的原型织布装置进行了研究。结果:实验结果显示,使用原型设计的肌肉活动水平和手部活动水平普遍低于使用传统拉布装置和使用标准拉布装置的肌肉活动水平(p < 0.01)。基于生产力和感知满意度,有显著的原型偏好(p < 0.01)。结论:该新型拉布装置适用范围广,为纺织工人所接受。建议未来的研究包括人体工程学评估,如实际现场生产中的肌肉活动和疲劳测量,以进一步完善工具设计。此外,工作站的改造和工作条件的改善应该被探索,以提高织造行业的整体人体工程学和工人的福利。这些建议的实际实施可能有助于提高生产力,减少织造工人与工作有关的不适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
F1000Research
F1000Research Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1646
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: F1000Research publishes articles and other research outputs reporting basic scientific, scholarly, translational and clinical research across the physical and life sciences, engineering, medicine, social sciences and humanities. F1000Research is a scholarly publication platform set up for the scientific, scholarly and medical research community; each article has at least one author who is a qualified researcher, scholar or clinician actively working in their speciality and who has made a key contribution to the article. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research is suitable irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; we welcome confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies. F1000Research publishes different type of research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others. Reviews and Opinion articles providing a balanced and comprehensive overview of the latest discoveries in a particular field, or presenting a personal perspective on recent developments, are also welcome. See the full list of article types we accept for more information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信