Artificial intelligence applications facilitate decision-making in cataract surgery for highly myopic patients.

IF 4.6 2区 生物学 Q2 CELL BIOLOGY
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology Pub Date : 2025-09-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fcell.2025.1613634
Kaimeng Su, Wenwen He, Haifeng Jiang, Keke Zhang, Jiao Qi, Jiaqi Meng, Yu Du, Kaiwen Cheng, Xiaoxin Hu, Dongling Guo, Haike Guo, Yong Wang, Yi Lu, Xiangjia Zhu
{"title":"Artificial intelligence applications facilitate decision-making in cataract surgery for highly myopic patients.","authors":"Kaimeng Su, Wenwen He, Haifeng Jiang, Keke Zhang, Jiao Qi, Jiaqi Meng, Yu Du, Kaiwen Cheng, Xiaoxin Hu, Dongling Guo, Haike Guo, Yong Wang, Yi Lu, Xiangjia Zhu","doi":"10.3389/fcell.2025.1613634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical decision-making for highly myopic cataracts requires a high level of expertise. We, therefore, aimed to develop a preliminary artificial intelligence (AI) model for surgical decision-making in highly myopic cataracts, based on previous deep learning models.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We first established a highly myopic cataract decision-making AI model by integrating cataract grading and postoperative visual acuity prediction models of highly myopic eyes, which we had developed previously, with surgical decision logic. The outcomes of surgical decision-making were classified into four categories: surgery not advised, cataract surgery recommended, retinal surgery recommended, and combined cataract-retinal surgery recommended. The gold standard for surgical decision is defined as the decision jointly made by two professional ophthalmologists together (X.Z. and Y.W.). If the decision-makings regarding highly myopic cataract surgery were not fully consistent, a final judgment was made by a third expert (Y.L.). Subsequently, we evaluated the accuracy of AI model's surgical decision-making against the gold standard and doctors at different levels, using both internal (107 highly myopic eyes from Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University) and external (55 highly myopic eyes from Wuhan Aier Eye Hospital) test datasets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the internal and external datasets, according to the Lens Opacities Classification System (LOCS) III international standards for cataract grading, 99.07% and 87.27% of automatic nuclear grading, along with 88.79% and 61.82% of automatic cortical grading, respectively, had an absolute prediction error of ≤1.0 compared with the gold standard. The mean postoperative visual acuity prediction error was 0.1560 and 0.3057 logMAR in the internal and external datasets, respectively. Finally, the consistency of the AI model's surgical decisions with the gold standard for highly myopic cataract patients in the internal and external datasets was 96.26% and 81.82%, respectively. AI demonstrated substantial agreement with the gold standard (Kappa value = 0.811 and 0.556 in the internal and external datasets, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The AI decision-making model for highly myopic cataracts, based on two deep learning models, demonstrated good performance and may assist doctors in complex surgical decision-making for highly myopic cataracts.</p>","PeriodicalId":12448,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology","volume":"13 ","pages":"1613634"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12443769/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2025.1613634","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Surgical decision-making for highly myopic cataracts requires a high level of expertise. We, therefore, aimed to develop a preliminary artificial intelligence (AI) model for surgical decision-making in highly myopic cataracts, based on previous deep learning models.

Materials and methods: We first established a highly myopic cataract decision-making AI model by integrating cataract grading and postoperative visual acuity prediction models of highly myopic eyes, which we had developed previously, with surgical decision logic. The outcomes of surgical decision-making were classified into four categories: surgery not advised, cataract surgery recommended, retinal surgery recommended, and combined cataract-retinal surgery recommended. The gold standard for surgical decision is defined as the decision jointly made by two professional ophthalmologists together (X.Z. and Y.W.). If the decision-makings regarding highly myopic cataract surgery were not fully consistent, a final judgment was made by a third expert (Y.L.). Subsequently, we evaluated the accuracy of AI model's surgical decision-making against the gold standard and doctors at different levels, using both internal (107 highly myopic eyes from Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University) and external (55 highly myopic eyes from Wuhan Aier Eye Hospital) test datasets.

Results: In the internal and external datasets, according to the Lens Opacities Classification System (LOCS) III international standards for cataract grading, 99.07% and 87.27% of automatic nuclear grading, along with 88.79% and 61.82% of automatic cortical grading, respectively, had an absolute prediction error of ≤1.0 compared with the gold standard. The mean postoperative visual acuity prediction error was 0.1560 and 0.3057 logMAR in the internal and external datasets, respectively. Finally, the consistency of the AI model's surgical decisions with the gold standard for highly myopic cataract patients in the internal and external datasets was 96.26% and 81.82%, respectively. AI demonstrated substantial agreement with the gold standard (Kappa value = 0.811 and 0.556 in the internal and external datasets, respectively).

Conclusion: The AI decision-making model for highly myopic cataracts, based on two deep learning models, demonstrated good performance and may assist doctors in complex surgical decision-making for highly myopic cataracts.

人工智能的应用促进了高度近视患者白内障手术的决策。
背景:高度近视白内障的手术决策需要高水平的专业知识。因此,我们的目标是基于先前的深度学习模型,开发一个用于高度近视白内障手术决策的初步人工智能(AI)模型。材料与方法:我们首先将之前开发的高度近视眼白内障分级和术后视力预测模型与手术决策逻辑相结合,建立高度近视白内障决策AI模型。手术决策结果分为四类:不建议手术、推荐白内障手术、推荐视网膜手术和推荐白内障-视网膜联合手术。手术决定的金标准定义为由两位专业眼科医生(X.Z.和Y.W.)共同做出的决定。如果高度近视白内障手术的决策不完全一致,则由第三位专家(Y.L.)做出最终判断。随后,我们使用内部(来自复旦大学眼科及耳鼻喉科医院的107只高度近视眼)和外部(来自武汉爱尔眼科医院的55只高度近视眼)测试数据集,对比金标准和不同级别医生,对AI模型的手术决策准确性进行了评估。结果:在内部和外部数据集中,根据Lens opacity Classification System (LOCS) III白内障分级国际标准,与金标准相比,核自动分级的绝对预测误差分别为99.07%和87.27%,皮质自动分级的绝对预测误差分别为88.79%和61.82%。在内部和外部数据集中,平均术后视力预测误差分别为0.1560和0.3057 logMAR。最后,AI模型对高度近视白内障患者的手术决策与内部和外部数据集的金标准的一致性分别为96.26%和81.82%。AI与金标准有很大的一致性(Kappa值在内部和外部数据集中分别为0.811和0.556)。结论:基于两个深度学习模型的高度近视白内障人工智能决策模型表现良好,可辅助医生进行高度近视白内障的复杂手术决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Cell Biology
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
2531
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology is a broad-scope, interdisciplinary open-access journal, focusing on the fundamental processes of life, led by Prof Amanda Fisher and supported by a geographically diverse, high-quality editorial board. The journal welcomes submissions on a wide spectrum of cell and developmental biology, covering intracellular and extracellular dynamics, with sections focusing on signaling, adhesion, migration, cell death and survival and membrane trafficking. Additionally, the journal offers sections dedicated to the cutting edge of fundamental and translational research in molecular medicine and stem cell biology. With a collaborative, rigorous and transparent peer-review, the journal produces the highest scientific quality in both fundamental and applied research, and advanced article level metrics measure the real-time impact and influence of each publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信